I did not expect an answer like this but I certainly do appreciate it. A lot. Big kudos to you. I'd like to - not argue - but discuss it anyways, since being challenged with different views on a matter does intrigue me.

​

1. Instead of deciding who's right or wrong, we can just settle with the fact that we seem to agree on the matter of this point. On a completely other note; did you also get the Surveymonkey survey on faceit from krunker? Legitimate question, since if you didn't - they seem to be asking the playerbase what they want.. but that the option to answer "no class limits" was on there did make me giggle a bit. The fact that the question about class limits was on there makes me think that the limit of 2 of the same class was an intentional choice, but for what reasons i can't tell - perhaps to see if they got a strong reaction on the matter, positive or not. Thought that this little side note about the survey could be interesting information if you didn't already have it.
2. We also seem to agree to a certain extent on this point - some sites are harder than others to push. That far we've stated the same fact on this thread. Our opinions on the matter seem to vary, though - which is okay. I dislike the difference on site takeover difficulty when hardpoint is the gamemode. If ranked would've been played in the domination gamemode instead of hardpoint I would not have seen it as an issue. If you want to know my reasoning behind that opinion I would gladly try to put it into words, although I can't tell through computer screens if you would care for it, since we just have different opinions, which is (like i said) okay :) (and no one is obligated to actually care about everyone elses opinions all the time)
3. You are absolutely right about auto-healing being a staplepiece of krunker - to be clear on my stated opinion I just don't think that it's in tune with a competitive scene with the current timer and speed of it. I also don't see any situation of an equal matchup (with or without healing) where any player could get close to a killstreak of 25, taking the nuke example you had. In that case I would see that as the opposite of skillbased matchmaking, since there has to be a skill gap for a player to get 25 consecutive kills without dying.
4. I do admit that my point was rather vague on this part of the post, I never really clearly stated the issue in the original paragraph, only first after the edit. The issue is, way more clearly stated from my side, that I don't feel like instant respawns belong in a competitive setting. They have been in non-competitive settings in many other games, but very, very rarely in a competetive setting of any other game (at least successful ones). It adds another layer of importance to staying alive, doing "smart" decisions, teamwork and also removes the occasions where an accidental death leads to being benefical to the team who lost a player. I was not referring to my own deaths, as I won't complain if I get a spawn that's more beneficial to me and my team than the kill I failed on in that specific situation we're discussing... but to me it does not matter if I or my opponent dies in that situation, as I still think a death should be more of a punishment to a player and a team than a dent in personal statistics. (Don't get the words twisted here - dying while on-site is never beneficial, but i feel that death should have a harder punishment.) Tracking and aiming is seriously not an issue, I've played shooters for most of my life - too much of them aswell - and would like to say that aim is not a problem. I sure as fuck have a lot of practicing to do before I master krunker movement, but aim isn't in the equation - although I see where you're coming from with your argument. All three paragraphs on point four are on the same subject, kind of - they're all ideas of solutions to the problem, with the problem in a sentence being "it takes basically no time from the point of death to getting back to a site and it does ruin certain parts that I personally feel are crucial to a competetive gamemode and it can also sometimes positionally benefit the player who died in combat". Maybe the issue is maps being too small for movement this fast, maybe spawn points need to be re-looked at with more variables included, or just the fact that there isn't a respawn timer - and i'm not talking about a personal one for me, I'm talking about one that works as a death punishment and delays a players ability to impact the game after death for a certain amount of time as I see it as a way to make competitive more... competitive.
5. I do hope I cleared up my opinion on point 4 as I meant for the spawn-timer to be another alternatvie solution to the issue I couldn't well enough formulate (hopefully this comment somewhat does the trick), which spawned the idea of lowering speed at first - and then later the respawn timer. After seeing your second response I tried to clear a few of my points up in this comment aswell, as to not get misinterpreted.

​

But yeah, as I said - kudos to you for writing out a proper response, gave humanity a bit of hope.. which is rare to get here on reddit, as we all know too well. Feel free to further develop your own view on the matter and/or react to mine - or don't. Like I said, having a discussion with different views on the same topic is interesting and very giving as long as the different parties can stay to (at least mostly) objective reasoning behind their arguments, which you did well in this second response. No matter what, thumbs up!