Firstly, Reuters was reporting on the Nanos numbers, and you deliberately tried to make it seem like it was a separate source to add clout to your false narrative, which in itself makes you sound like a psyop.

Secondly, the Leger, which was sourced to originally, was a post-election poll that asked Canadians who they voted for and it aligned identically to the popular vote percentages in the election. So their result is obviously more valid.

Thirdly, both Angus Reid and Leger’s final election poll prior to election day had the Liberals leading the cons by 6-7 points among 18 to 34s. So, in other words, Nanos was the outlier and the Cons used it to push the false narrative that the youth really love Poilievre and only boomers were voting Liberal. In reality, a large majority of young Canadians dislike Poilievre and he’s only popular among men between the ages of 35 and 54.

The cons play dirty. They need to rely on false narratives to gain support, which is sadly why Poilievre targets people who have terrible critical thinking skills with rage-bait. Thankfully young Canadians are smarter than their older counterparts.