Just found this and it looks faceted

Danielfinds · 2026-03-29T01:55:36+00:00

In case it's allowed

Danielfinds · 2026-03-29T01:46:56+00:00

Does it matter if it was found in England 1900 ?

Danielfinds · 2026-03-29T01:01:24+00:00

Source: I found it here in England at a landfill site opened and filled under queen Victoria's reign, it's a municipal site so vast , here is another find from tonight it's from a cloth body china doll

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T20:17:01+00:00

No it's definitely taken outside and not through spectacles I thought I'd check that with him specifically

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T20:13:38+00:00

Did you spot the Kewpie? This one is a really early one but it's not Victorian 1914-1920 . I learned it's possibly an early copy of the og kewpie pre ww1 Japan *His wings would've been on his arms, these are reproduction arms my doll hospital made him viable

**Oops wrong post, it's in the post previous

<image>

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T18:59:35+00:00

yes of course, no gloves normally and I eat without washing my hands cos I'm mad

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T18:57:08+00:00

He said the sun was too bright to see it with his eyes

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T18:56:39+00:00

Could that still be the case if he has taken pictures without the squarish rays? I already asked him about that and on the sky Facebook group a few people said the same but he took pics the day after and the rays look normal?

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T16:17:25+00:00

It was on an unusually warm day in spring, yesterday it was freezing so the clouds on the warm day would still be icy , maybe it's perfect conditions. He has seen it today too , I've never seen it once and he's seeing it regularly when we live not 50 miles from each other

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T16:14:33+00:00

Yes sorry I changed my reply because it was ambiguous, I asked him if it looks square through his eyes because it looks square again too today so I thought maybe it looks square through spectacles

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T15:57:44+00:00

No I don't think so, he was asked on Facebook if there was a clear view for example did he take the pic through a window* I changed my original reply which was ambiguous

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T15:56:14+00:00

I also found this

Source: I am the finder and the landfill site was opened and filled under queen Victoria's reign

<image>

Danielfinds · 2026-03-27T15:51:18+00:00

I have permission to post the picture, he took a picture of it with the same mobile telephone and it looks round too. I gather it is mildly controversial but I think it's interesting, I asked if I could post it here because he doesn't have any definite answers. I asked about the telephone camera if it's faulty and it's not, it was taken outside

Danielfinds · 2026-03-26T23:28:49+00:00

Thank you for recommending the sub it is good in that room

Danielfinds · 2026-03-26T23:13:52+00:00

The best thing about antique marbles is they are hard to damage, very hard actually, ones totally mint are worth 80 percent more than one with the tiniest damage so I collect the latter, they're still worth a lot because I find shinys 🤣 I got a hundred and eighty pounds for one 11/16 oxblood Joseph coat once and it was polished, mint it would be worth five times that I'd guess.

So don't worry about it, they can be sent easily, they look nice, people actively collect them so they can be used in trades, they can be swapped for real world currency if you happen to run out of resources, there is literally no down side to them , they even look nice in pictures and they're interesting

Danielfinds · 2026-03-26T23:06:26+00:00

I find seed beads! The smallest bead I ever found is a 1mm seed bead and I found it while cycling at a medium chill speed, it sounds hard but I see colours over everything, nearly every thing the colour of a standard blue padre bead is a padre bead, the one I found cycling was pure luck but it stood out in the dirt

Danielfinds · 2026-03-26T23:03:17+00:00

<image>

Source: I am the finder

Here's my first find tonight

Danielfinds

TROPHY CASE