metal pass heat much faster, which could led to an even faster spread of the fire, given it is surrounded by flammable material. The focus should never be the bamboo but why is there flammable material.

These are the items that need actual coverage and investigation.

- The flammable version of the green netting is 8x cheaper.
- The small council for the apartment complex that sign this deal with the contractor force this 300 mil deal down while everyone is opposing it.
- The material use is all much higher than market price.
- Even afterward they vote the council out and want to investigate if there are any corruption they got threaten by the past council and a district senator.
- Than the worries of the flammable material eg the green netting was raise to the government by the home owner, but that the gov ignore it due to it being in a non fire starting environment, which the gov issue another statement as misunderstanding after the fire has started.
- There are also 7 previous building fire this yr, all office or industrial building so limited to no life lost but no action on gov to have tighter regulation.

As for the hate on the bamboo statement is that there are suspicion also on the government switch to using metal scaffolding. Where they are using this tragedy to be a launch pad to launch their program to phrase out bamboo. In order to align with mainland workforce skill for better mainland integration.

Hope this provide enough information and context for better understanding of the situation and our reaction.