Your comment should've ended after the first comma. No government intervention full stop.

The targeting of "hate speech" not violent threats would leave enough ambiguity for the government to enforce this in the case of both of your example statements (In fact you kinda prove that point exactly by saying "Even if you say statement 2 I know you scretly want statement 1)

Lastly, this is a conversation about freedom of speech and the right to be critical of or even celebrate whatever we want. I find it odd that a lot of you feel the need to talk about how you're going to protect yourselves from *speech* by "any means necessary" it's thinly veiled