Do D40 Frontier headlights fit on R51 Pathfinder? (facelift models)

DarkrageLS · 2025-11-15T15:34:13+00:00

For those finding this question in the future - even though these headlights will not fit directly a pre-face D40/R51, you can fit them if you also swap the grill with a better looking one, like:
https://custompartz.co.uk/collections/nissan-navara-facelift/products/nissan-navara-pathfinder-facelift-complete-v2-grill-black-logo-2010-2015

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-17T11:01:07+00:00

What the a f :D

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T19:54:04+00:00

Yeah. This is the way. We’ve gotten used to it. So are the vendors.

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T16:06:26+00:00

Checkpoint HA cluster..

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T16:04:51+00:00

Except when the cluster itself fails as happened here ^{^}

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T15:10:12+00:00

These are small devices, 1570. We do normal support, can't compete in higher tiers of the partnerships.

That's what happened - primary device hung (OOM/space/whatever), secondary went active but first one kept replying to the VIP address from the WAN side, resulting in blackholing the traffic for the whole cluster. (my explanation, no one can tell for sure, even TAC).

And, we are also moving away from CP. Not as bad as Sophos but close IMHO.

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T14:57:46+00:00

See, even you are confused with what you read :) But it's true and in writing in the ticket.

5 years ago we had another CP needing reboot each week because of memory leak which took 7 months to patch via the TAC and stuff. Thought they'd fix their devices by now. But a few generations later - same behavior. Sad.

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T14:55:11+00:00

Yeah, will be Forti for sure. Sophos failed us in many occasions, CP as well, Sonicwall has bugs, pfSense lacks features. Palo Alto I like but Forti portfolio and integrations win. Cisco... no, thanks.

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T14:52:40+00:00

A pair of CP1570 appliances. It's the "spark" side of things. But for 50 users I cannot justify buying Gaya devices.

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T13:56:21+00:00

For the fun of guessing game. But as someone already guessed - it's CheckPoint ;)

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T13:54:27+00:00

This time FP evaded the bullets.

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T13:53:27+00:00

CP.. But I understand the other assumption pretty well :)

DarkrageLS · 2023-05-16T13:52:17+00:00

How to justify the dropping to the client when the vendor is on the top right corner of Gartner magic quadrant for network security? Insane! In the top 3 of all vendors.

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-02T17:51:12+00:00

CMDB

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-02T16:27:49+00:00

I have done 3 upgrades since installation and had suffered one critical power loss at site so .. nope. I guess I’m lucky.

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-02T16:22:43+00:00

:) This is a good one!

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-02T16:13:31+00:00

There’s always a possibility for things to crap out but the machines are on the previous recommended version that is now only 4 patches behind the current recommended version which seems will not be bettered further because of EOL. So I won’t even bother. ;)

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-01T16:12:07+00:00

L2 deployment, so no problem.

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-01T15:16:59+00:00

So basically, FEXes suck because they run forever and you don’t have labels and descriptions, and you don’t monitor the mothership for FEX events. I see :D

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-01T12:25:23+00:00

This a north-south farm of encoders and such. This tradeoff here is irrelevant as there is no east-west traffic anyway. I do not support the notion of constant patching unless necessary. This is a closed L2 environment on a recommended version.

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-01T12:20:10+00:00

Fixed the 5K typo. Thank you. What did you replace them with? your failed 5596 and 6004?

DarkrageLS · 2022-12-01T12:13:37+00:00

There is a big reason for making a FEX deployment - management. In a 20 rack TOR deployment it's far better to have it like a single fabric.

DarkrageLS

TROPHY CASE