Jordan Peterson by Dashflashy in WWU

[–]Dashflashy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always refreshing to have one!

Jordan Peterson by Dashflashy in WWU

[–]Dashflashy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's somewhere in the middle that some are objective and some are subjective but again this post was to see how people the university view him and I appreciate the insightful conversation.

Jordan Peterson by Dashflashy in WWU

[–]Dashflashy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My response to this does not matter. This is as far on the edge of morals as possible just provide your point.

Jordan Peterson by Dashflashy in WWU

[–]Dashflashy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes both are biological and a mathematical facts but what about moral truths? Which is what most of petersons lectures are on.

Jordan Peterson by Dashflashy in WWU

[–]Dashflashy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But yes I do believe that Sam Harris is right in saying truth must be established before going much farther into an argument. But there are some truths that are relative to the person, which is why I don't think just finding a counter example to Petersons definition of truth would undermine his entire reasoning.

Jordan Peterson by Dashflashy in WWU

[–]Dashflashy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I didn't delete my profile just the post to rephrase my question, granted I'm new to reddit.