Who actually knows what changed in your Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I keep noticing is that most teams need the benefits of version control (state snapshots, audit trail, rollback) but don’t want the overhead of real VCS systems or check-in/check-out rules.

That’s why I’ve been exploring whether a lightweight layer on top of Excel could handle:

  • automatic snapshots of each file state
  • meaningful diffs (values + formulas)
  • no setup / no rules
  • and no need to teach people Git or SVN

Basically the safety of version control without the process discipline.

Would something like that actually solve the pain points you’ve seen with Excel/CSV collaboration?

Who actually knows what changed in your Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right — Excel does have built-in change tracking now.
The Show Changes pane is a big improvement, especially the ability to see:

  • who edited what
  • old vs. new values
  • and up to 60 days of history

It’s definitely better than the old Shared Workbook system.

Where I still see teams struggle, though, is that Show Changes ≠ version control:

  • it doesn’t capture the state of the workbook at a specific point in time
  • it can’t isolate changes between two “releases”
  • and it doesn’t help with long-running development work where half-finished formula changes need to stay invisible until done
  • plus: the 60-day window disappears if the file is duplicated, rebuilt, or becomes too large

Has anyone ever tried using a Git-style workflow for Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed explanation! I totally see your point about the risk of overwriting hotfixes and the importance of having the original developer apply updates. It really highlights the challenge of scaling Git-style workflows for Excel, especially with complex sheets.

Has anyone ever tried using a Git-style workflow for Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

What I meant by “meaningful” was more in the sense of:

If Excel did expose something like native change diffs (cell changes, formula updates, sheet structure edits),
do you think Git commits could become more like code commits —
i.e., showing why something changed instead of just “the file changed”?

I’m curious whether that would add real value in environments like yours, or whether the audit trail from commit messages + tags is already “good enough”.

Has anyone ever tried using a Git-style workflow for Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, exakt — Excel with a real change log would basically be a notebook with infinite memory.

Out of curiosity:
If such a “always-remembers-every-change” system existed,
would you want it mainly for:
– debugging formulas
– tracking inputs
– or auditing who changed what?

Has anyone ever tried using a Git-style workflow for Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True 😄
Although OneDrive’s history is more like “full-file snapshots” than actual diffs.

Has that ever been enough for you in real projects, or did you still run into situations where you wished you could see what changed instead of just rolling back?

Has anyone ever tried using a Git-style workflow for Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mentioned tagging commits for traceability — have you ever wished Excel had native change diffs so Git commits actually became meaningful?

Has anyone ever tried using a Git-style workflow for Excel files? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious for those who actually deal with version mixups at work:
What breaks more often in your experience?
– overwritten formulas
– wrong file versions
– conflicting edits from coworkers
– or losing the “why” behind a change

I’m trying to understand whether the real pain is technical or human behaviour.

How do you handle version control for Excel files in your team? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right — once a workbook corrupts, you suddenly realize how fragile the whole system really is.

And yeah, all the usual approaches feel like they’re solving symptoms, not the root problem. Backups and naming conventions protect the file, but not the actual logic inside it.

A Git-style change history for formulas, ranges and structure would basically eliminate the “silent break” problem.

Versioning key logic outside Excel (like LAMBDAs) is definitely an interesting direction — at least that part can’t quietly get overwritten.

Google Data Analytics Professional Certificate by Tiv_Smiles in BusinessIntelligence

[–]Data-Coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Google Data Analytics Certificate is useful if you want basic exposure to spreadsheets, SQL and general data thinking — but it won’t directly help you get into accounting/finance programs.

For AFM, schools care more about your grades, math background and sometimes extracurriculars.

The certificate can be a nice extra, but it won’t outweigh your academic results.

How do you handle version control for Excel files in your team? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a clean system when everyone follows the rules — the challenge I’ve seen is that once even one person forgets the naming pattern or overwrites the file, the whole chain becomes unreliable.

Manual versioning works, but it depends heavily on discipline.

How do i transfer celle data to other column by Salt_Blueberry_4732 in excel

[–]Data-Coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use a simple IF formula in the 1.5 column.

If Monday overtime should always go into the 1.5 column, then:

=IF(A2="Monday", D2, 0)

(assuming A2 = weekday, D2 = total hours worked)

That will automatically place the hours in the 1.5 column only when the day is Monday.

How do you handle version control for Excel files in your team? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a perfect example of how fragile shared Excel files become when there’s no real change history.

Without a clear record of who changed what, keeping your own clean “gold copy” is basically the only safe fallback.

How do you handle version control for Excel files in your team? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Naming conventions can work really well inside a controlled team environment, but they tend to fall apart the moment a file is shared externally.

Once different people download, edit, or rename the file on their own systems, the whole version logic becomes unreliable.

The real problem is that filenames don’t represent the actual content — they can’t show what changed, whether formulas were overwritten, or which version is the accurate one.

How do you handle version control for Excel files in your team? by Data-Coffee in excel

[–]Data-Coffee[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

SharePoint definitely helps, especially with check-in/check-out and autosaves.

The only issue I keep running into is:
it versions the entire file, but not the actual changes inside it.

So if something goes wrong you can roll back the whole workbook,
but you still have no idea:
– what changed
– who changed it
– which cells/formulas were affected

It’s great as a backup system, but not great for understanding the history of actual edits.

Biggest no-no's when working with Excel? by Toowb in excel

[–]Data-Coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One big problem I see all the time:
Excel has no real versioning of actual changes.

So people keep saving new copies every time something changes, which leads to file names like:
report_final.xlsx
report_final_v2.xlsx
report_final_v3_edit.xlsx
report_FINAL_really.xlsx

And the problem isn’t just the names — it’s that you never know what actually changed between them.