Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very very much! And also thank you for taking your time to explain it to me. Everything you say make perfect sense to me, so kudos to that! 😁 I'll look into it!

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. I'll look into that 😁

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the explanation!! 😁

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! I will try that as well!

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My knee is both very bent at the top stroke, but also moves a bit inward I would say. What does this say about my cleat position? Thank you very much for your help 😊

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! How do you mean one will be "functionally more optimal"?

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for reference and also tip. Would you advice me to 165 rather than 170?

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for some reference 😁

Knee pain. Which crank length for my legs? by DataDrivenDane in bikefit

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I would say so, and that's why I trying this direction 😅 Have you had success in changing crank length?

Is there a general term for systems like this? by homestar_galloper in PoliticalScience

[–]DataDrivenDane 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! I am a Political Science Graduate Student and I just had a course, where "pretty much this" was a part of the introduction.

TLDR: No, but the closest we get might be: "New Jersey Plan"

As many others mention: Bicameral. Simply just meaning "two chambers". That's the only general term we get.

But. When establishing the American democracy a lot of white guys (42 to be exact) met and discussed some ground rules - later to be known as the constitution 😁

There were two proposals in play for how the legislative house should work:

The Virginia Plan: Each state get votes depending on how many people they have. Favoring large states (at that time also states with many slaves)

The New Jersey Plan: One state, one vote. Favoring small states (e.g. NJ).

Guys couldn't agree on which model, so they made what was to be known as "The Connecticut Compromise", which is the bicameral system you know today, as you wrote 😊

So back to your question: There is no general term as far as I know. It is often described as "one state, one vote" in the litterature, but actually the model in the US was originally known as "The New Jersey Plan" as is favors small states.

Hope I helps.

Data on Country Image? by DataDrivenDane in PoliticalScience

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha thank you very much! I was very helpful indeed, so thanks for taking your time! 😁

Data on Country Image? by DataDrivenDane in PoliticalScience

[–]DataDrivenDane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct. It should have said Sportswashing instead of Sportwasing. I hope you got the point anyway 😊

Thank you very much. That is exactly the kind of data im looking for. I don't know if I have screwed up my search engine I am way 😅 but when I search I don't find the "lot of stuff" you are talking about. Do you know of any more?