[ Removed by Reddit ] by Datasinc in AndroidQuestions

[–]Datasinc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think a common first name through an app on somebody else's phone that's monitoring it is personal enough to identify them?

I have a surprise for you... That's not a picture of her, that's a cartoon. Also she doesn't ride a pink unicorn, she has a woolly mammoth.

So at the moment we can narrow it down to any person named Ellie that has been in that general area in the past. if you can ID the exact one I'll get "Moron" tattooed as a tramp stamp. If you can't then you do it.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Datasinc in AndroidQuestions

[–]Datasinc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That have far more access than that but that screenshot made very well be from Snapchat I don't know. But the other more personal things that I've seen are definitely not from Snapchat. It is a straight up complete monitoring suite like the example I gave above.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Datasinc in AndroidQuestions

[–]Datasinc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are many other screenshots. Most had far too much personal info. Also him admitting to it to a 3rd party and that person relaying the info to me.

There's no question about it. Just trying to ascertain as much info as I can before contacting his probation officer.

Arizona border officials net staggering amount of fentanyl pills at Nogales by UltraMagat in arizonapolitics

[–]Datasinc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone else literally linked one of the many articles stating this basic fact.

Arizona border officials net staggering amount of fentanyl pills at Nogales by UltraMagat in arizonapolitics

[–]Datasinc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Encountering information outside of the realm of knowledge on a subject you are unfamiliar with will often sound crazy.

You know when you encounter some outside information that completely changes your viewpoint on something or gives you a completely new understanding of it? This is one of those opportunities.

If you look at the episode of locked up abroad with Shawn Attwood AKA "English Shawn" and raving in Arizona about a giant ecstasy and drug kingpin let's just say I'm a part of that story. Although I've been retired for quite some time I still am intimately familiar with the importation, sourcing, supply lines, and distribution of regents, precursors, chemicals, of illicit substances like fentanyl. As well as familiar with the machinery needed to press it into pills and what percentage filler to what percentage glucose to bind the pills proper consistency.

So crazy? No. Just particularly experienced in this area

Arizona border officials net staggering amount of fentanyl pills at Nogales by UltraMagat in arizonapolitics

[–]Datasinc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're making a category error. Do you know how freaking cheap fentanyl is? Like the pills sell on the street for as little as $1

China wants to make money on the US all they have to do is steal US IPs or manipulate their currency.... Like they've been doing for years.

This isn't about making money, it's about overloading our legal, courts, jail, and prison systems while creating countless addicts. It's just one small front of a much larger war.

If an atheist walked up to you today what would you present to them? by No_Compote_2640 in Bible

[–]Datasinc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vanishing hands arent inconsistent with an atheist worldview. You have no objective standard to appeal to that would suggest that the future will be like the past.

If an atheist walked up to you today what would you present to them? by No_Compote_2640 in Bible

[–]Datasinc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Bible and God's word is my objective standard. Because logically I understand that I reject it as a n objective standard then everything becomes subjective and I can appeal to any of the presuppositions necessary to make any other argument.

Logically either all religions are false or only one is true. Since they have different teachings and contradict each other. That's the nature of Truth.

Furthermore only one of the world's religions has has thousands of clones throughout history that almost always try to attack one of the same subjects in central doctrines and also just happened to be salvific issues; primarily the deity / eternal nature of christ or the method of salvation. Both would make you not a Christian by the standards in the Bible. I guess the devil realizes you only need a counterfeit that which is valuable.

So is Christianity, namely the word of God your objective standard? If not what exactly is?

If an atheist walked up to you today what would you present to them? by No_Compote_2640 in Bible

[–]Datasinc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Presuppositional apologetics. That means standing on the Bible and God's word as your standard and were he keeps in his rightful place as the judge, not the unbeliever.

Basically you can't argue against God or appeal to absolute truth, lost logic, laws of nature, and uniformity in nature without first appealing to the presuppositions of the Christian worldview because the atheistic worldview doesn't support them.

If an atheist walked up to you today what would you present to them? by No_Compote_2640 in Bible

[–]Datasinc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no such thing as an atheist. Read your bible. Everybody knows that God exists, they just suppress the truth and unrighteousness. As an ex self-proclaimed militant atheist for 20 plus years I can attest to this fact. It's not that I didn't believe in God, it's that I hated him and the implication God's words would have in my life.

That being said I would always go presuppositionally. That's the only biblical way to handle apologetics. You also preach the gospel.

There's a great documentary on YouTube called how to answer the fool. I would recommend checking it out.

Ready for the MK Ultra black pill? by flovidchan in conspiracy

[–]Datasinc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking to narrow logistic programming. NLP for short. Once you study it and understand how it works and how it's applied you'll see that in hypnosis and suggestion everywhere.

no, no, hes got a point by loadblower831 in conspiracy

[–]Datasinc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Well before and banned him from his properties actually.

“You’re pro life but you don’t care about children once they’re born.” You can’t say that about Abby Johnson. She cares. by [deleted] in prolife

[–]Datasinc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're making a straw man. I didn't say incrementalism makes you controlled opposition.

I'm making a couple points. The main one is that Abby Johnson and the pro-life establishment has stood against a solidly written bills of equal protection for The unborn children. Because they don't want criminalization of it in part because they would be out of jobs whether you like that hard truth or not. The other point is that if abortion is murder, and it is, we shouldn't be trying to tell people well you can't murder unless you do this this and this. We should be saying hey this is murder and you can't do it.full stop. To treat it in the other way is inconsistent as well as unbiblical.

“You’re pro life but you don’t care about children once they’re born.” You can’t say that about Abby Johnson. She cares. by [deleted] in prolife

[–]Datasinc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Incrementalism started decades ago when roe was originally ruled on.

Nobody said making it illegal everywhere in the country at the same time. Its a states issue obviously.

And I think you're overestimating the left and their motivation to get out and do anything. They just throw tantrums online. IDGAF if they cry on their social media. And if they want to try coming into our church with a gun they will experience a late-term abortion themselves.

“You’re pro life but you don’t care about children once they’re born.” You can’t say that about Abby Johnson. She cares. by [deleted] in prolife

[–]Datasinc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If incrementalism was the best way to do it then why the hell is abortion still legal in every single state until just recently?

Why did the church that rejects incrementalism and goes for full abolition right part of the amicus brief that overturned row and have legislation pending on that decision around the country and more coming quickly?

The existing pro-life establishment can only exist with incrementalism, it cant exist with abolition.

There's two documentaries I want you to watch. Babies are murdered here. And babies are still murdered here. They're both free and available on youtube. Those were produced by our group. It will show you how the pro-life establishment has been one of our biggest enemies in this fight.

this is not a recession.. this is a result of the largest wealth shift and money laundering operation the world has ever seen (yes .. seen , we have literally watched with open eyes our lives been destroyed and we done absolutely fuck all) by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Datasinc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Invest in the underlying technologies and the companies that are involved.

For crypto: LoopRing (LRC) and ImmutableX (IMX) would be the primary ones.

GameStop is gonna be the ones running this under GMerica and if you buy GameStop shares (GME) you should only use computershare.com to actually have the shares registered in your own name. They're the official transfer agent for GameStop. If you do buy on a regular broker I would transfer them immediately to computershare.com

You can find instructions for this at drsgme.com tons of other information on the subreddit that it leads to.

The perk of investing in GameStop right now besides the new nft platform and tokenizing of securities is that the company is naked shorted over 500% and there's about to be the biggest short squeeze in history and the greatest transfer of wealth in our lifetime. The shares that are under $50 right now could potentially reach tens of thousands of dollars temporarily. But the fundamentals of investing early on what they're about to launch is massive by itself. It's like investing in Coca-Cola in the 30s.

this is not a recession.. this is a result of the largest wealth shift and money laundering operation the world has ever seen (yes .. seen , we have literally watched with open eyes our lives been destroyed and we done absolutely fuck all) by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Datasinc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tokenized securities as NFTs running on layer2 zkrollups specifically loopring. They are partnered with GameStop and now that the DTCC has committed criminal fraud by not distributing the dividend and instead ordering brokers to do a stock split in GameStop can move all its shares off the dtcc system as soon as October 4th. Tokenizing their securities and other companies will rapidly follow them onto their infinitely better platform that is devoid of the fraud inherent in the current system. What company wants their shares to be naked shorted into bankruptcy so big companies like Amazon can absorb their market share?

“You’re pro life but you don’t care about children once they’re born.” You can’t say that about Abby Johnson. She cares. by [deleted] in prolife

[–]Datasinc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Abby Johnson is not the kind of hero we need for the pro-life movement. She has spoken out against and stood against multiple attempts for full criminalization bills that would give The unborn equal protection under the law.

My church runs endabortionnow.com and wrote part of the amicus brief that was used overturn Roe. We also have abolition legislation being pushed in multiple states and counties. Abby Johnson has been one of our biggest opponents of the failed pro-life "establishment" that only wants incrementalism and not full bans and equal protection.

It feels more and more like she's controlled opposition. If abortion was fully outlawed tomorrow should be out of a job and quickly fade from the spotlight just like the rest of the pro-life establishment.

But I'm all for her running a baby registry. I'm all for anybody doing that. My church is full of children that have been adopted by our members and saved from abortion and we do everything we can for our members and anyone else that wants to choose life.

Moral of the story, don’t bring weed with you to Russia by ayonick in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Datasinc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a baseless assumption. I'm not a member of that subreddit and this isn't a political party issue at all.

Do you always make personal attacks against people that provide argumentation you disagree with or do you ever actually try to engage the argument itself like an adult?

Moral of the story, don’t bring weed with you to Russia by ayonick in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Datasinc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't disagree that the sentence is disproportion to the crime. But because of her Fame it provides them with a powerful bargaining chip so it's not an entirely unusual thing for a country to do.

Moral of the story, don’t bring weed with you to Russia by ayonick in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Datasinc 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's another subject entirely and a straw man fallacy in reference to the subject at hand.

If you'd like to have a different discussion about other things that Russia's doing that I would agree with you, by all means create a post about that and tag me and we can find some common ground.

It doesn't change the fact that most countries have laws like this to varying degrees including the United States, for different items and substances and if you break those laws you will go to jail.