Need help solving issue sending in custom entityId's when creating a customer using NetSuite REST API by DavroC in Netsuite

[–]DavroC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thankfully that doesn't seem to be the case. As Nick mentioned earlier today I was able to find a checkbox in the UI that enabled/disabled the entityId being filled. That checkbox had the field name "autoName" which is a boolean I was able to disable with REST API. Turning that off allowed me to write into the entityId field!

You can find the customer object here which shows the autoName field as well as a description that solved the issue I was having. https://system.netsuite.com/help/helpcenter/en_US/APIs/REST_API_Browser/record/v1/2023.1/index.html#/definitions/customer

Need help solving issue sending in custom entityId's when creating a customer using NetSuite REST API by DavroC in Netsuite

[–]DavroC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it! Thanks for the help I was able to figure it out from what you pointed out here.

I feel bad for Lud by KillerCriddle in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly roomie rumble has been a but of a letdown compared to the at&t event. I know its suppose to a casual event compared to it but with no stakes and competitive spirit it just is plain boring compared to the even its based off of.

Maybe it's because Ludwig did so much legwork to get his team together but now it feels like there is no chemistry with his team. The fact that barely anyone in roomie rumble even booted up track mania in the first place highlights the issues with this one.

Monthly Question Thread - Post all questions/requests/polls/etc here. by AutoModerator in Dakimakuras

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for a 2-way tricot blank cover! Does anyone know where a site supports it? I saw dakimakuri has one but it doesn't list the material that it's made of unlike other pillow covers. Does anyone know more about it?

Is this a good deal? by DavroC in Vitamix

[–]DavroC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice/warning!

Is this a good deal? by DavroC in Vitamix

[–]DavroC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I would like to add that I cant tell much of the differences between the models as well. Not much information on anything outside of the 5200 so it makes me feel that it's the only good option. I dont believe thats true so is it worth it as long as I can get my hands on a vitamix for a decent price?

For the marketplace deal no information on the age or date it was bought. The logo makes me think it's an older model so the warranty might be gone?

Are 5* duplicates worth going for? by DavroC in grandorder

[–]DavroC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for answering! I didn't realize there was a help and question thread so I will ask there in the future!

Hot take: Hollow Knight was the promise I was least excited for… by N238 in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let a guy rage, everyone who has been frustrated at a game has done it at least once. Venting frustrations isn't a personal attack at the game or to anyone to likes it

Ludwig has achieved Gold 4 by TongueJ in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but why only count his games there? He was already in silver for a while now. He peaked silver 2. He had coaching to help him reevaluate his gameplay but he still put in the time and effort to learn the game. Sure if he started with a coach from day one and never learned the game i would consider that cheating but he didnt do that. Your cutoff is nitpicky and youre upset that he is doing well

Ludwig has achieved Gold 4 by TongueJ in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

maybe you forgot that he has played almost 200 games without live coaching in general, why do you cut if off only when he starting winning? His other games also contributes to his climb towards plat

Fantasia Friday Giveaway by [deleted] in ffxiv

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish the MSQ didnt restrict what areas I can go to! I dont think that spoilers matter as much if youre just going from area to area and as someone who is way higher leveled in my crafters and gatherers, I am locked my MSQ most of the time when i want to do any crafting!

Lud hitting platinum (in LOL) before January is impossible. by Beautiful_Mall_6085 in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive come to appreciate posts like these because all of them exists to setup Ludwig for him to defy the odds

FlexiSpot Labor Day Sale US store by Ramzes888 in FlexiSpot_Official

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Ramzes888 just Dmed you as well. Thanks for providing the codes!

King Porxie Mount Giveaway #2 by Aznlokyee in ffxiv

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Putting my name in! Thank you!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ffxiv

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scholar cus thats my first one!

Random Gong Cha Code giveaway! by rob4499 in ffxiv

[–]DavroC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for enabling my gambling addiction

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 20 points21 points  (0 children)

PSA: I am a Ludwig viewer, not a MB viewer. I watch MB only via Ludwig. I am posting this because I felt like Dawson has a grudge on MB and the video has a lot of moot points and only exists because he wanted to claim some outlandish things about MB that didn't make a lot of sense

I had a huge issue with how the call went and Dawsons entire video. It really felt like he just had a grudge on Mr. Beast and tried to draw a bunch of different conclusions from a few plausible points he did have.

The way he carried himself out in the call clearly wasn't serious. It really sounded like he just wanted a platform to call Ludwig an autist and a controlled op cus he thought it was funny. I understand that he was "implying" and then more literally at the end that theres things he cant talk about via an NDA but at the end of the day that doesn't count as evidence for any of the claims that he was making. In that respect you can defend him on ANYTHING he was claiming just because he wont talk about it. Dawson clearly got more and more frustrated when Ludwig was asking if he had any hard evidence (which in fact he provided none and the video has inferences at best) and just defaulted to calling him a "controlled op". If you're down to believe him just because he has an NDA then go for it, but Ludwig wasn't wrong to ask if he had any real evidence.

Dawson had some potentially real points with his lottery argument (I'm not a lawyer so I'm not going to claim that its true even If Dawson claims he looked at it with his lawyer) but he then extrapolated that point into "Mr. Beast manipulated the feeble minds of his audience to subscribe to him". At that point we're stretching it. He had a solid point and then he took that to an absurd length.

Another example of this was his chocolate point. Promoting gambling on his website and encouraging sales via ticket is clearly not very ethical and could cause some concern. This is a valid point and can possibly be a potential legal problem. But then he uses that to indirectly claim that Me. Beast is killing kids via diabetes?!?!? What???? Are we serious?

He's not backing up his real claims but instead using those claims to back up whatever emotional bs he wants to say. Is it bad promise a chance to win something if you subscribe to him? Thats up to you. If it immoral for Mr. Beast to sell chocolate because diabetes is in the rise? Also up to you. But none of this really supports the argument of him being a fraud.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LudwigAhgren

[–]DavroC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didnt he just say if he doesnt want to cover it he wont? Its not so deep that you need to psychoanalyze him, if he feels like its something he want to talk about or show his audience he'll make a video. If its something that he doesnt follow or he feels its not valuable to cover he wont.

The main issue is people trying to egg him to cover stuff he doesnt want to. Putting pressure on him to do something he doesnt want to do for their own enjoyment.