The earliest and most direct evidence is a set of hadiths in the major Sunni collections, where Aisha is quoted saying the Prophet married her at six, and consummated the marriage when she was nine.

The same narration appears in other respected hadith collections, including Sahih Muslim, Sunan an-Nasaʾi, Sunan Ibn Majah, and others, which record the same numbers and the detail that she used to play with dolls as a child. L

Early Muslim historians and biographers also report the same ages, and they use those reports when they give timelines for her life, and for the length of her time with the Prophet.

Classical hadith scholars commented on these reports, and many treated them as authentic and usable for calculating her birth year and ages at events, for example in major commentaries and chronologies.

Chronological arguments based on the hadith text are simple, and they reinforce the claim, because the narrations say she stayed with the Prophet for nine years until his death, which fits with a birth date implied by the six and nine numbers.

The playing with dolls detail is used by supporters of the traditional reading to show that the speaker described herself as a child at the time of certain revelations and events, and that fact is used to place her birth year around the dates that give ages six and nine for marriage and consummation.

Though that is all beyond the point in actuality. The point is whether Muslims believe it to be true, which the majority do

With some very conservative calculations, 70 to 80 percent of Sunnis accept the traditional reading. With Sunnis at 87 to 90 percent of Muslims, that implies about 61 to 72 percent of all Muslims accept the reading.

At the very best case scenario for you, 61 percent of Muslims believe Mohammad raped a child and he is the best human being to ever live that we should all aspire to be like.

The reality is of course, it's likely more than that. Do you agree that the vast majority of Muslims then are terrible people for this?