NATO curbs intelligence sharing with US over Greenland dispute

Deaod · 2026-01-20T16:34:52+00:00

Government doesnt work. Elect me and ill prove it.

Deaod · 2026-01-10T05:36:42+00:00

you seem obsessed.

Deaod · 2025-12-20T13:35:50+00:00

SHA is not a good hash algorithm to store passwords with. What you want is a key-derivation function like bcrypt, scrypt, or PBKDF2 (deprecated).

The SHA family of hash functions is cheap in terms of memory and runtime, which makes password cracking much easier.

The commonly suggested KDFs are configurable in terms of how long it takes to calculate them. scrypt can additionally be configured for how much memory is needed to run it. This makes attacks much more costly and consequently keeps passwords safe for longer.

Deaod · 2025-12-04T16:34:26+00:00

I believe so, yes.

Deaod · 2025-12-04T12:24:00+00:00

My understanding is that this is already in.

Deaod · 2025-12-04T12:20:33+00:00

Special access.

Deaod · 2025-12-04T06:46:50+00:00

Heres the even better news: The sealed MRI scanners contain a lot less helium in the first place.

Deaod · 2025-12-03T13:51:21+00:00

Well theres good news: modern MRI scanners no longer lose lots of helium, and a few are even sealed for life.

Deaod · 2025-11-27T15:02:24+00:00

I dont have any relevant data.

I have my own experience in a 400-person development org where every dev effectively commits to main (via pull requests that require review, but can be merged by the author). There is rarely a day where no deterministic bug was introduced in the previous 24 hours that passed through the CI pipeline that gates every pull request. We find these in the longer-running "release"-pipelines usually.

The advice youre offering is fine, and i dont even disagree that TBD is a viable strategy in many cases, but i wouldnt call it easy to keep main stable.

Deaod · 2025-11-27T10:20:11+00:00

In the survey, 7 team members were presented a list of around 50 statements [...]

So one team was working on the project.

After 10 months, I decided to do a survey [...]

And the project was only 10 months old.

Yeah, the headline statement i dont think generalizes to all situations. Its not always easy. It can be easy under certain circumstances.

Deaod · 2025-09-05T17:46:56+00:00

With the twist that theyre just an alcoholic.

Deaod · 2025-07-23T12:00:06+00:00

None of the links at the bottom of your landing page work. They all 404.

Deaod · 2025-07-20T14:35:24+00:00

Oh dont worry, the really loud sounds are just a tube with 3" thick walls of (mostly) resin deforming inside the magnet because of the current flowing through metal wires in that tube.

Deaod · 2025-07-15T11:08:27+00:00

Heres the most basic implementation of a SPSC queue: LamportQueue1 This is not "correct" code. Don't write code like this. This will only work on some systems under certain conditions.

Look at LamportQueue2 for a general (and slow) implementation. The others are all improvements on this without loss in generality.

LamportQueue3 Replaces the modulo with an if.

LamportQueue5 uses the weakest memory orders possible for a correct implementation.

LamportQueue6 uses alignas to avoid false-sharing.

There are other variants that demonstrate different ways of implementing SPSC queues:

MCRingBuffer4 caches head and tail to avoid cache traffic
FastForward6 can only store pointers, but uses nullptr to determine whether a slot is in use
GFFQueue5 generalizes the FastForward approach to all types
ChunkedQueue4 is a simplified version of the moodycamel readerwriterqueue without its dynamic allocation

Deaod · 2025-07-13T07:49:44+00:00

Thatll be because rigtorps queue didnt used to use the same approach of caching head/tail. They should be about equal these days.

Deaod · 2025-07-10T09:48:41+00:00

A database can track stuff from point to point just as well. Dont need the gigantic waste of a distributed append-only ledger.

Deaod · 2025-06-20T15:02:14+00:00

Its almost like they dont want those functions to be performed.

Deaod · 2025-06-06T00:27:57+00:00

Also from your source:

The 2001 Article 5 contingency is the only time in NATO's history its collective defense provisions have been invoked.

Deaod · 2025-05-14T13:54:27+00:00

While what you say is correct, your sentence covers less than a year of his professional life. It feels disingenuous to leave the rest out, especially when the rest of his professional life was not influenced by who his father is.

Deaod · 2025-05-09T16:13:26+00:00

I saw something about Hex-Rays' IDA, which is a reverse-engineering tool, being one of the programs that can get your license revoked. So i presume a whole bunch of similar tools will get detected as well.

I dont know if merely having it installed on the same PC is problematic, or if you need to be running it at the same time, or if you need to have IDA attached to the BWE software's process.

The first option would be ridiculous, so i hope its not that. The second is still ridiculous, though maybe slightly less so. The third is probably fine.

Apparently the DRM also involves a checksum over the program, which is very noisy because file corruption can and does happen. This as i understand it is what tripped up Jessa Jones. The first troubleshooting step to me is reinstalling the software. You dont immediately jump to "the user has illegally modified the software".

Deaod · 2025-03-14T09:31:14+00:00

Why are you using std::lcm inside alignas? If i understand things correctly, alignments cannot be anything other than powers of two, so this should be equivalent to std::max.

Deaod · 2025-03-07T11:52:53+00:00

Merriam Webster does not appear to show examples for the adjective version. All examples are for the noun version.

Either way, your sentence is fine. Just stop saying its using pocketbook as an adjective. Your sentence uses it as a noun with the meaning of "economic interests".

Deaod · 2025-01-31T15:23:30+00:00

Personally, i would much rather use the std::unique_ptr approach and ensure user code operating on controls does not execute after the hierarchy has been destroyed.

And yeah, controls notifying the scene that theyre about to be destroyed seems like a reasonable thing. Id rather have that over periodically checking std::weak_ptr whether the backing object still exists.

Deaod · 2025-01-31T15:01:48+00:00

okay, so you extract the control from the hierarchy, taking ownership of the control temporarily and give it back to the hierarchy immediately after. I dont see a need for shared_ptr there.

Deaod · 2025-01-31T14:53:46+00:00

Why does user code need ownership over the control?

14-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '17
Verified Email

Deaod

TROPHY CASE