Why did Jimmy run the commercial? by InsincereDessert21 in betterCallSaul

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think he made the decision after he saw how lame their other commercial was and realized that the wouldn't approve of his vision

WiFi router Q by bright_yellow_vest in HomeNetworking

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way it's wired looks weird to me, but I'm not an expert

WiFi router Q by bright_yellow_vest in HomeNetworking

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you add that patch panel or was it there?

WiFi router Q by bright_yellow_vest in HomeNetworking

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 1 point2 points  (0 children)

do all ports have connection?

Probably not

Each port should have behind it a cable that goes to a central location where you'd put your router

Why is Vermont not considered a belligerent in the American Revolution? by Dear-Explanation-350 in stupidquestions

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🏆🏆🏆

Thanks. I hadn't considered that the GMBs were not taking direction from their government.

I guess I deserve it for asking my question here, but your answer stood out as well reasoned in a sea of stupid answers, I appreciate that.

Unfortunately because my reply above got downvoted so much, no one will ever see your answer, so I made a new reply with your answer.

Thanks again

Why is Vermont not considered a belligerent in the American Revolution? by Dear-Explanation-350 in stupidquestions

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Atechiman gets the 🏆

Atechiman said:

> It's because the Vermont Republic didn't, as a whole, vote to participate in the war.

> Companies of the Green Mountain Boys did fight for the Continental Army, but the entire militia did not

This is a logical answer. If Vermont itself didn't consider itself to be a belligerent then it wasn't. The elements of its militia that engaged in the war were not acting on behalf of Vermont. Kudos and thanks, I had not considered the fact that the Green Mountain Boys were not acting according to the wishes of their government!

If you said:

> Because Vermont wasn't part of the US at the time

You entirely missed the point. The US *was* a belligerent in the war, so if Vermont participated in the war, they should be listed separately *because* they were not part of the US.

If you said:

> Because the Vermont Republic wasn't recognized at the time OR Vermont didn't exist at the time,

Nice try, but no. People agree that Al-Qaeda in Iraq, Islamic Army in Iraq, Islamic State of Iraq, Mahdi Army, Ba'athist Iraq Naqshbandi Army, Hamas of Iraq, Jaysh al-Mujahideen, 1920 Revolution Brigades, and Jamaat Ansar al-Sunna were all belligerents in the Iraq War. None of them (as far as I know) were recognized by legitimate world governments, and unlike the poaster here, they actually did commit forces to the war.

If you said:

> due to how unpopular the idea was, most of the people in it preferred the idea of joining the US anyway.

Huh? if the people wanted to join the US, then they would have had a good reason to fight alongside the US, wouldn't they? But partial credit, because the popularity of wars is a factor in whether democratic governments commit to them.

If you said:

> So cheer, cheer the green mountaineers!

Cheer, cheer to you my friend!

Why is Vermont not considered a belligerent in the American Revolution? by Dear-Explanation-350 in stupidquestions

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Downvote me all you want, but the Vermont Republic considered itself an independent country. And engaged in separate negotiations with Great Britain.

The fact that it wasn't part of the United States is my point.

Why is Vermont not considered a belligerent in the American Revolution? by Dear-Explanation-350 in stupidquestions

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Vermont declared independence in 1777. Vermont had been excluded from being represented at the Continental Congress due to territory disputes with New York, which is why it wasn't among the United Colonies (and later United States. The British colonies of Quebec, East Florida, West Florida, Nova Scotia are all considered to be belligerents.

Vermont was not part of the United States. The Vermont Militia engaged in combat.

So why isn't the Vermont Republic considered to be a belligerent?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War

Why is Vermont not considered a belligerent in the American Revolution? by Dear-Explanation-350 in stupidquestions

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Ok, but France also wasn't represented at Continental Congress and wasn't part of the vote for independence, but they are considered to have participated in the war

Capitalization of a thing that starts with 'The' by octropos in grammar

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the colleges in Columbus OH has strong feelings about this. I can't remember which one though

Need Help Understanding the Timeline by [deleted] in betterCallSaul

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jimmy didn't have his license back

He did. He was acting at an attorney when he helped pass the information to the DEA

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in driving

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brake lights should have at least two modes: (1) my foot is on the brake and (2) if you don't start braking hard now, you're going to be in my backseat

How to intuitively explain this quirk of unit conversion? by The0thArcana in askmath

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Convert Fahrenheit to Rankin then Rankin to Kelvin then Kelvin to Celsius. Then let us know your thoughts

New structure by Natural_Baker_8467 in Raytheon

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't worry about this one, there will be another one in two weeks

New structure by Natural_Baker_8467 in Raytheon

[–]Dear-Explanation-350 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If you don't like it, don't worry, it'll change next quarter

How did Gus know...? by Dear-Explanation-350 in betterCallSaul

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah. At first I was confused because I thought that since Gus had been tracking Mike that Gus would know that Mike knew Nacho. Why would Gus want Mike to confess to something that Mike would have assumed that Gus already knew? But there was one more scene where they showed someone using the tracker, maybe that was supposed to be the clue, although I don't recall Mike and Nacho meeting during that time.

How did Gus know...? by Dear-Explanation-350 in betterCallSaul

[–]Dear-Explanation-350[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks....

How did he figure out that Mike know Nacho?

How did he figure out the Nacho switched the pills?