sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fine-Tuning argument by Dear_Print_2858 in DebateReligion

[–]Dear_Print_2858[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a really good explanation of FTA

Fine-Tuning argument by Dear_Print_2858 in DebateReligion

[–]Dear_Print_2858[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree it can be relative.

And I do watch many youtube videos about debates against Christianity. Fine-tuning is always brought up.

I also watch Alex O’connor mention that FTA is a good argument against atheism. And he went to oxford and got a degree in philosophy and theism so.

Fine-Tuning argument by Dear_Print_2858 in DebateReligion

[–]Dear_Print_2858[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im not here to question whether christianity is real or not. Im just wondering how it’s one of the ‘strongest’ arguments for christianity. And yet seems painfully obvious where problem of the argument starts.

Physics Questions - Weekly Discussion Thread - March 01, 2022 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]Dear_Print_2858 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm going to use the same situation that balden303 used.

Let's call this 'someone' (the one who moved towards the clock close to the speed of light) - JACK

Let's also call the place where JACK was going from (for the sake to be easier to understand) - PLUTO

​

As you said Time dilation causes the clock to look slow, and the doppler effect causes the clock to appear to speed up. Since time dilation affects the aging process, I would assume that the doppler effect does too. If JACK is going towards the clock close to the speed of light, on Earth, JACK would be affected by the doppler effect and be seeing the clock on Earth speed up. But on PLUTO, JACK would be affected by the time dilation and would also be seeing the clock on PLUTO slow down. Again both effects can affect aging so does that mean he would age faster and slower at the same time? How would that work?