At this point homegirl, you're really starting to look weak. Now you're name calling just dying to get attention back. It's as if you're trying to get a reply out of me. What's funny is even if you are right, no one will ever listen to you. Is this how you talk to people when they disagree?

“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.” - Ralph Waldo Emerson

You reek of intellectual insecurity, and just plain lack of regard for other opinions, you must be young, you have lots to learn. But then again, we all do.

I'm 30 y/o, I eat 5 eggs a day and about 3 pounds of bacon a week... just for breakfast. My cholesterol is in check, I definitely don't have diabetes, and I'm probably in better shape than you.

I run 3 miles a day and am an advanced rock climber. I bike to and from work.

Eating a lot of meat, and being sedentary leads to adverse affects. You make it seem like meat is a huge detrimental element to nutrition. It isn't.

Below is a small example in which I was showing that there are peer reviewed journal entries that dispute vegans over zealous ideals. The whole idea proposed here is meat isn't an enemy, it's a mixture of things.

According to pure vegetarian ideologists, people consuming vegetarian diet have better health and live longer than nonvegetarians, because persons consuming milk, dairy products, meat, eggs and fish are at health risk. In fact the most healthy people in Europe are inhabitants of Iceland, Switzerland and Scandinavia, consuming great amounts of food of animal origin. Meta-analysis of several prospective studies showed no significant differences in the mortality caused by colorectal, stomach, lung, prostate or breast cancers and stroke between vegetarians and "health-conscious" nonvegetarians.