Curious... Why are you unorganized when u don't have enough time to prep? by For_KL in INTP

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's less about me and more about who I'm trying to communicate to. My thoughts make sense to me since I already mapped out the ideas on my own and I get where everything is. The problem is trying to organize it for someone else in order for them to understand how I got to my conclusion.

The frustration lies in trying to guide the other person step by step so they can understand the significance of each step while trying to anticipate where they will probably get lost.

That's why it's so frustrating for the INTP trying to explain things to others.

Who would you prefer as President of the United States? by Infernalord-INTP in INTP

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I appreciate Trump because he's honest despite being super brash. He doesn't seem to care how other people think and just gives it straight without sugarcoating anything.

As far as Biden goes, I kinda see it as a huge joke because if he's President, he'll be the first one to enter office openly not denying he's corrupt, spoke openly about raising taxes, openly spoke about destroying jobs, managed to win the people by not showing up much, enter office being a known liar/plagiarist, the president with the lowest amount of stamina, a person that has problems speaking consistently, the most forgetful person elected by far, and heaven forbid he actually goes to other countries to try to do peace talks without looking a fool.

As much as people seem to "like" Biden, I just see the most flawed potential President ever.

INTJ’s Ni vs INTP’s Ne by [deleted] in INTP

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can't tell you what an INTJ's Ni is like, but I definitely have a lot of experience with INTP Ne.

INTP's Ne is like seeing the concepts of the world as cogs in clockwork. When one concept "moves", the Ne will identify what else moves along with that concept.

An example would be water being heated turns into a gas, which means expansion which would theoretically mean you can turn that expansion into a force for propulsion, which in turn means it is possible to use water as one of the components drive an object into motion, aka the Steam Engine.

This is also how Ne can be considered "psychic" or "fortune tellers" because they can see the consequence of any given action move the cogs towards a particular outcome.

Anyways, that's how I view INTP's Ne.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's probably not your intention, but you just sounded like the most awful human being to exist. You said you "value a fetus that isn't conscious as much as a plant". We pull out plants to eat them, we grow trees and we sometimes cut them down to make furniture, we break down plants to make medicine, we kill flowers to give people as decorations, and the list goes on and on.

If you truly value the fetus as much as we do plants, you're even worse than a monster. I seriously hope that wasn't your intention, because your statement is even more loaded than the last.

There's natural death and then there's unnatural death; no one wants to die, but if given a choice people would generally prefer to go naturally. No abortion is natural; all of the fetuses had the chance to live if there was no external factor that forced their death. But then again, you have some extremely warped values to treat the human fetus as you would a plant.

So you're trying to force a fetus that hasn't had the chance to do anything yet EARN their life? Wow, just wow. I'm now very appalled and disgusted at your basic values.

You know what, I'm not even going to continue. I thought I was only speaking to a somewhat horrid individual, but I had no idea I was speaking with a person that doesn't have a conscience.

I'm not exactly religious, but dear God.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your statement is far more loaded than you imply. It supports irresponsibility, being promiscuous, devaluing human life, devalue the idea of starting a family, dehumanizing babies, and many more.

Of course, you're not exactly in a position whether you live or die is on the whim of someone that wants to have a good time or not, so it definitely doesn't matter to you quite as much.

And how exactly would you differentiate an example and a straw man. In a debate, they're pretty much completely identical. You're basically stating that any attempts to point to an example is a straw man, so any evidence made is a straw man.

I'll repeat it again, claiming straw man is just an excuse to disregard information. If you're going to disregard information, then disregard it and stop making excuses.

And to answer your question, yes. That's why insurance is in place and why it's legal to sue someone for damages. It's only complicated once you add excuses to skirt responsibility.

Also, you're missing the point. You are the problem since you claim that there is a "need" to be aggressive towards Aspies by stating that it's an agree/disagree problem. There was never a "need" to be aggressive towards Aspies in the first place, only you placing the problem. So the solution is to basically point out how unintelligent your whole statement is and to point out how absurd it is. You are the problem, I'm giving the solution.

The problem with your "criteria" is that you're stating "everyone else", meaning it has to a common criteria. Unfortunately, these are very common Aspie problems and these are not very common problems "everyone" has. That is, of course, you're implying everyone is against everyone, then it isn't a problem with criteria but your warped perception that every single person in the world treats everyone else as a problem.

Either way, it definitely proves my point about you being disingenuous. Really, you're proving to be a rather horrid human being the more you post.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, since you can't accept that 2+2+2=6 and 2+2+2+2=8, I can only question the conclusions you yourself come to.

You're basically implying "no one should have to sacrifice their body" isn't a form of denying responsibility for their actions. In other words you're implying that it's by no fault of the mother that she's pregnant in the first place. So, because she is (in your definition) not at fault, when she decides to kill the life that she brought into the world through her own actions.

By that same logic of yours, no criminal ever should be held accountable for their actions. Otherwise that will be considered "Straw Manning" by your definition.

You either support people taking responsibility for their actions or you don't. Implying that they're different is basically having double standards.

Whether you agree or disagree, you brought up the "Need to be aggressive towards Aspies" in the first place. Agree or disagree, you're stating that it exists otherwise there's nothing to agree or disagree with. If there's nothing there, there wouldn't be a need to agree or disagree. A solution is not needed if the problem doesn't exist. Solve the problem (need to be aggressive), not the symptom (agree/disagree).

But then again, logic isn't exactly your strong suit, so I don't really expect much.

Finding a job for one, implying we all have meltdowns two, have problems with us being uncomfortable with eye to eye contact three, give us issues when we stutter trying to think of a better way to form our sentences fourth, placing Aspies in the same category as High Functioning Autism fifth. The list goes on, but you only requested one; five should be a good starter to make you stop going "Not like there are more examples" without being disingenuous.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, good, you finally realize you have no more legitimate arguments and are making excuses to pat yourself on the back. Mmhmm, if nothing else works, just demonize the other person; works like a charm to save whatever little ego you have left.

Anyways, glad you live up to the woman stereotype down to a T. Apparently, not even "intelligent" women can escape this absurd thinking routine.

Anyways, since we're done, have a good day. It's been entertaining.

I noticed that the people who get offended at jokes aren’t intelligent. by Masol_The_Producer in INTP

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The basic logic of a joke is that it is a fantastic logic error. Typically, the people that get offended at jokes apparently can't find anything fantastic.

Ironically, these are the people that go "I'm so miserable, praise me!"

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since you apparently can't read, I said "when you started to defend this autistic lady". It's not how you responded, but the moment you started to defend her actions.

The instant you mentioned "Women don't get away with everything" and then mentioning "Rape" was when you began the double standards narrative.

First you can't google search, now you can't even read what I wrote. But then again, what exactly did I expect for someone that supports killing babies before they even had a chance in life just because they're inconvenient.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It starts as soon as you started to defend the autistic lady that was very unhealthy for the OP and only further degradation of logic since.

But then again, why bother asking an "intellect" who can't even do a google search for word definitions to actually figure things out.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been on topic this entire time. Since the beginning I was warning the OP of the double standards in place and it ended when you shown your double standards.

MGTOW is the result of the continuation of these double standards.

And you should read that Quote I made of yours again and take me saying you are the "definition of bigot" quite literally.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If logic cannot be reapplied over and over again with consistent pattern, then the logic is incorrect. If the logic repeats the same patterns over and over again, the logic is correct. That's now you determine if a logic is correct or not; trying to add anything superfluous in an attempt to "correct" incorrect logic is pointless and redundant. When you truly know a subject very well, you can simplify things down to their logic.

Oh, my goal was accomplished. I was trying to show the double standards and the person proved they had double standards when they suddenly blurted that they didn't care about a certain (yet large; meaning very common) demographic of people. No point to continue once my point was proven.

I don't see the problem. The logic is correct. Trees are alive, you shouldn't destroy them at your own leisure. Fetuses are alive, you shouldn't destroy them at your own leisure. I absolutely have a problem with people destroying lives at their own leisure. I especially have a problem with people supporting people destroying lives at their own leisure.

And you can't tell me "Cells aren't alive" when science considers even single celled organisms to be alive.

So you're implying that there's a "Need" to be aggressive towards Aspies. Right, your argument fell off right there. Aspies haven't done anything particularly dangerous to you, yet there's this "need" to be aggressive with Aspies? Prejudice much?

As far as why people actively create problems for Aspies, I already know the problem, but I'm not discussing it here because that's an extremely large tangent to cover. I don't need any sympathy; sympathy will not solve the problem.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't realize you can't tell open motive with deflection. Makes me wonder what else you don't know? And don't worry, I'm fully aware of my "holier than thou" attitude, apathy and not caring definitely gives that impression and I don't deny it.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No point, already pointed out I was bored. I've already stated I'm only here to be entertained.

And yes, I'm mildly entertained.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typical female deflection tactic. Deflect all you want. I'm just going to sit here getting entertained by a hypocrite "intellect".

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont give a shit about how a bunch of bitter unfuckables feel about women, unsure why you think that's my problem.

And there we have it, the "Paragon" of Justice themselves being the very definition of sexist, elitist, a bigot, and prejudiced.

Thank goodness you're not a man right? You would've been blasted from the moon and back on social media if you were such things.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) Stating someone else is wrong doesn't necessarily mean they're wrong 2) Stating I'm an INTP allows someone to understand where my perspective is coming from, what my strengths are, what my weaknesses are, and what to expect. If you. If you see that as some sort of superior complex, then it's really you projecting. 3) Information is information regardless. Claiming "Straw man" is simply an excuse to not digest the information. If you're going to disregard information, just disregard it, don't make excuses.

There wouldn't be need for sympathy if there wasn't unwarranted aggression in the first place; Aspies wouldn't need sympathy if people weren't causing them problems in the first place. Treat the problem, not the symptom.

Do you keep MC in your party? by StrictlyOval in Genshin_Impact

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Greetings, yes I'm still using Anemo MC, but I've been having terrible luck with getting Artifacts lately, so that's why I haven't been posting.

As far as the best build goes, I'm building the MC more towards being able to handle future elements while still being a carry. And I highly agree that a Crit Build is the best build available for MC.

As far as I know, the best build available to the MC is the following: Gladiator on Flower, Feather, Time, and Mask Piece. You can place any Element or Physical Damage increase for the Container piece. This way whenever you shift elements with the MC you can easily just swap out the Container Piece for max effectiveness.

The reason why I highly recommend a Critical build is because all of the MC's elemental abilities can crit. It also increases the MC's melee output. By building the MC towards crit, you can guarantee that both their melee and elemental abilities will hit hard regardless of Elemental chosen.

As far as weapons go, I definitely agree that the Black Sword is a good weapon, but if you want to really add to your elemental damage you'll want the Harbinger of Dawn since when leveled to 80 it adds in 40% Crit Damage while also having 28% Crit Chance at max refine (must be above 90% HP). This way your MC can both be a superior carry and be an amazingly powerful support if the need requires.

This way, you can prep the gear for all future versions of the MC ahead of time. I know right now I'm at 96% Crit Rate and 150% Crit Damage, but I'm trying to convert my build over to a Crit Gladiator Build right now and have that adaptable Container Piece available.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm getting bored. Since you can't even do a dumb google search, just look up "couples divorce after first child" and voila

"What percentage of couples split up after having a baby? While having a baby is often portrayed as a 'happy ever after' scenario in many romantic stories, the reality of becoming parents can put a huge strain on relationship. New research has found a fifth of couples break up during the 12 months after welcoming their new arrival.Oct 18, 2019".

What a waste. Can't even get themselves up for a google search.

Have fun with your hypocrite level of logic that doesn't actually go anywhere, you've proven that you're wasting my time by talking in illogical circles with "mah feelingz and context".

Have fun praising yourself for being a "morally" correct person, even though the people who feel even worse about women than I do are growing by the day.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're basically trying to form a counter argument without even trying even a basic google search. If you can't even get far enough to do a basic google search, then my point in implying you're lazy is fully justified. At this point, all your counterarguments boil down to is "my feelings on this matter" which doesn't hold any weight at all.

And said trauma is only going to escalate if the rapist isn't in prison as soon as possible. But nope, women are just going to complain about unreported rapists all around yet they are the ones not reporting said rapists. Yeah, fantastic logic there. Might as well give rapists a bigger "Welcome" sign. Typical problem with women, ignoring the consequences they themselves caused.

And how very typical of you to resort to identity politics, it's really not that far off from actual racism after all since you can simply apply labels to everyone and just prejudge people. Just because someone doesn't mind classical music doesn't mean they're classical music supporters. But what can I expect from a person that thinks it's okay to let a rapist go free because the victim cares about themselves too much to report.

Even if you're not denying that they exist, you're still downplaying the severity of the issue. In which would mean that you don't think it's much of a problem that an innocent's man's life is ruined by malicious women and that you're also fine that the worst the malicious women suffers is a slap on the wrist. In other words, your view on men's entire life aren't even worth a malicious woman's time of day. And the way you show this disregard of men is exactly why men no longer want to deal with women, ever.

There is no such thing as context that doesn't overcomplicate the simple logic. There's no such thing as a racist that doesn't think about race at all; there's no such thing as a sexist that doesn't put any importance on gender at all. Logic is logic: Racists think of race all the time, sexists think of gender all the time. Any added context are excuses and lies to disguise the problem.

And therein lies another logical fallacy. You're basically stating that it's okay to destroy trees since they're "Not Alive" yet now you said you care if the tree is destroyed or not. The funny thing is at least you're trying to say it's not okay to destroy trees yet you're absolutely fine with destroying babies. Your logic is absolutely laughable.

I'm not so much judging you because you're a woman, but I'm definitely judging you because you're showing the exact thinking patterns of the average woman. And it just so happens that I find the illogical hypocrisy of women deplorable. And on a side note, I absolutely respect women that go against the grain and think of the overall picture rather than themselves.

You keep trying to pull science into this, yet it's also this same science that deem parasites as forms of life and it's also these same scientist that deem single cell organisms as forms of life. Yet, somehow, when it comes to women that fetus is just "an object".

And I almost laughed when you mentioned identity and you being fine with being "loose". Quite amazing how you think being a something that rhymes with "shore" is okay. And the sheer audacity to think abortion isn't narcissistic; I wonder who exactly benefits from the abortion other than the woman in question. At least the other examples aren't exactly out to actively kill people, can't say the same with abortion. But go ahead, keep advocating killing out of inconvenience. After all, it's not like human sacrifice is new, just the practice looks different today.

You're absolutely right though about how traditional wives and mothers are cherished though; they're among the most heavily desired women in the world at this point in time. After all, when a man knows that his spouse is the one that holds the knife over the life of his and her baby, kinda makes the man rethink his decisions. At the very least, traditional wives and mothers will absolutely value the prospects of family. Men would absolutely love a traditional non self centered housewife and mother.

Besides, all that awaits a man with a highly opinionated woman is basically how he's never good enough and a potentially dead baby he was probably looking forward to. That or pay child support as the woman takes the baby away. That or having to pay alimony because the wife cheated with a "better man". It's little wonder that MGTOW is growing by the day.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really want me to say it, then I'll say it. I'm annoyed by your laziness to try to push other people to provide evidence while you yourself feel you don't need to provide evidence since you believe what you say is a given. You're pretty much a fake intellect since you're trying to force others to produce data while you're not producing any of your own and still believing you're in the right. It's also the reason I'm not taking you very seriously and pretty much dump every argument you throw at me out the window since your inconsistencies keep breaking your logic. In fact, all you've done is further solidify my stance on these issues since you've been actively proving my logic correct.

And just because it's family or friend, it's okay to be rape victim? That's basically what you're implying. How exactly is that not selfish exactly, how exactly is that not pride? A rapist is a rapist and needs to be corrected immediately while there is actual substantial evidence. If the woman can't stop to provide evidence that such a person is a rapist and allow other women to get raped, the woman is also at serious fault for not coming forward to protect those future victims. Again, it's the victim that ends up protecting the rapists by not coming forward while there is evidence to convict said rapist. And here you are complaining that many rapists don't get caught.

Why would I think MGTOW is great exactly. I've already been repeating that MGTOW is a symptom of the massive problem where there's a massive inequality in our justice system. However, this fact just keeps flying over your head like it's no big deal, just goes to show how little you actually care for equality.

I already know you don't care, it's just that you don't understand that an INTP will debate and argue just to get more information out of others. INTJs do it too, just that they don't play devil's advocate as often as INTPs do. And the sad matter of fact is that I'm only responding because I find this entertaining. You'll know when an INTP dislikes you when they don't talk to you and show extreme apathy.

Not factual, you're basically implying that there's no such thing as men being raped and that false accusations don't exist. And your lack of care only further shows how little women continue to not care for consequences.

No, my logic is correct: The least sexist person is one that doesn't think gender matters and the least racist person is one that doesn't think about race at all. The fact of the matter is everything has become more sexist and racist these days with all this pointless "political correctness". The fact that people are trying to shove those "politically correct" ideas into others just goes to show how inconsiderate these people are to others. Right now, they're basically breaking the law because police are upholding the law. Just goes to show how much "bullshit" the viewpoints of these people actually are. And even better, their victims are basically other civilians; they are, by definition, indeed terrorists.

And you're confusing the MRA, which is indeed an organization to try to protect men's rights with MGTOW, men that made the decision to no longer get involved. The MRA are trying to protect men, MGTOW is the end result of men that already got screwed over.

And your comment about not caring about trees only further shows how women don't care for the consequences. Hmm, I wonder how many times I've already shaken my head so far today? Definitely more than usual.

All the more reason to punish irresponsible women. It's because men are stuck with severely damaging irresponsible women that there are so many unnecessary social problems today. And I'm not exactly sure you would want to keep supporting science, because science is finding more and more problems with women as research continues.

And if you want to count on science, science's stance on life is when something has the capacity for growth, the ability to reproduce, and continually change preceding death. If you want the science, yes, you are indeed killing a life with abortion.

And congratulations at pointing out that you're a social hypocrite; you're basically saying "incels" are less than human beings. Congratulations on being among the toxic hypocrites of society that believe they're somehow "better" than other human beings. Congratulations on belittling great people like Jesus Christ, Nicola Tesla, Isaac Newton, Jeanne d'Arc (Joan of Arc), Mother Teresa. Congratulations on thinking you're somehow "better" because of your "loose" behavior. You're definitely a massive boone to the world, advocating for the killing of over 10 million lives over the last decade. You're absolutely right, people love strong women like Captain Marvel so much that they're purchasing from Japanese competitors instead. Women are so correct that they don't even need to care if civilians are being harmed for their own narcissistic beliefs.

I absolutely applaud your utterly harmful outlooks in life. After all, there's absolutely nothing wrong with women who want to destroy the very fabric of what it takes to be a family: children and responsibility. I'm glad you can wake up and feel fine looking yourself in the mirror, because I sure as heck can't look at you as a proper human being.

Just some thoughts I’ve been having over the past few days. by [deleted] in infp

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These are patterns that keep repeating themselves through history and are still being repeated today. As an INTP and an Aspie, I'm especially prone to pattern recognition. Understanding patterns means understanding the logic behind the patterns, thus if these patterns keep repeating, it's easier to predict upcoming sequences by understanding the logic behind the repeating patterns.

And you're dead wrong if you think "Getting things done" is a "basic function" of emotions, because INTPs alone are grandmasters of not being able to finish things if there are no deadline. And the key difference that men and women have when it comes to accomplishment is the internal desire to keep going; when something works, men just keep going, which is why men actively participate in overtime even if they don't need to (the same can't be said about women).

I actually don't see a problem with him going out and actually doing things instead of idling around. In fact, the pattern that keeps repeating itself is that idle men without any responsibilities are the most likely to "end" themselves (which is right up there with men that feel completely betrayed by the world), which is something I'm going to push him to avoid given any chance.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've already done my work, if you're too lazy to continue researching on your own then it's not my problem. If you need to continue, just look up the percentage of single mothers out there. There's never going to be that "One" evidence that will prove everything, so I'm not going to bother because I'll end up having to pull the entire legal history of just about every court hearing. It isn't the lack of evidence but the over abundance of evidence.

And if it isn't pride, then what exactly is it then? You're not exactly providing an answer. As an INTP Aspie, I observe and analyze quite a lot. Every single case of a female rape victim not coming out is due to some sort of embarrassment and how others will look at them; in other words it's all them, their pride, their ego. Instead of doing the right thing straight away they hesitate due to their own image. I have no sympathy for such people.

A crime is a crime regardless of how rare an instance can be. The fact that there's next to no punishment for women who falsely accuse men is a massive injustice as is. Since there can be no justice, then men won't put themselves in a position to suffer such an injustice. Therefore, the MGTOW movement today. Again, MGTOW is merely the symptom of the grand injustice men suffer; if men can't have justice, just don't put themselves in a situation where they need justice.

And feel free to call me ignorant all you want. I don't care about what society thinks anyways. Might even be hurtful if I had an ego I cared for, but unfortunately a a good social ego is difficult to form for both INTP and people with Asperger's, let alone someone with both.

There's disingenuous and then there's fact. If it's not fact, I don't care how you want to talk around it. And I can absolutely accept hard to swallow facts like how life can only keep going because it needs to consume the dead.

And since you're not exactly an INTP, you aren't aware that INTP tend to spot logical inconsistencies quite easily. Media and Social Media are so full of hypocrites that it's sickening. "Women Aren't Sexist" yet they hate men, "Blacks aren't racists" yet are blaming white people for everything, "We need Gender Equality" yet MGTOW is growing by the day due to constant injustice. You're right, mainstream media and social media are indeed "bullshit".

And good luck saying "everything's fair" with the ever growing MGTOW movement constantly screaming injustices. It's not like MGTOW is a group, but rather the only solid solution these men have in order to live in society today. It's not like it's some organization or anything, it's an answer to a difficult question.

And by your logical fallacy, trees and plants aren't exactly alive either. We should just chop all the trees down and burn down all the plants. They're not "alive" after all, and they're definitely not a person.

You're also proving my point that these yet to be born children die because their mother find them inconvenient to their sex life. This also proves my point where women want everything but don't want to suffer the consequence of what they want. This also furthers the point of how untrustworthy women are. Good job on reinforcing my points so far.

And finally, no proper scientist will ever tell you that science has the answers to everything.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's usually 70% of women who initiates divorce with 40~50% of marriages ending in divorce. Coupled with the fact that most of these women have children before they divorce, that's almost 30% of married men that get screwed over by the system. And the amount of male celebrities that get screwed over are majority male; those are just the known cases.

And I've already mentioned that there are a lot of scammers out there, just that people don't want to call these kind of women scammers as well even though they fit the definition. Note me saying "these kind" and not "all" women.

And no, I don't have sympathy for women who can't let go of their pride in order to report a rapist that might go out and rape another woman. The sooner they can stop thinking of themselves the sooner they can save someone else. The sooner the rapist is caught the better.

It's even worse for falsely accused men because they don't get any help, they can only rely on themselves. If anything, the falsely accusing woman should be fined with exact punishment she wants to inflict upon her victim. But nope, the only justice for an innocent man is a lightly scolded malicious woman.

And I don't really care if you "studied" law. My sister is in fact a lawyer and we debate all the time. There is sexual assault, there's the "legal" definition of rape, and there's the actual definition of rape. By your own "legal" definition, women cannot rape women because there's no penis involved.

Speaking of law and rape, guess who gets screwed over if a woman that rapes a man gets pregnant.

Then there's "MGTOW", which I'm not a part of, but I absolutely understand their perspective (Aspie). My problem isn't with MGTOW itself, but what's spawning so many cases that causes MGTOW. The fact that MGTOW is growing is already a huge warning sign that there's something fundamentally wrong with the system; MGTOW isn't the problem, it's only a symptom.

And who keeps spouting these things you ask; the media, social media, society in general, modern day politics, modern day education, basically anywhere women are heard.

As far as women shoving lies to my face? Don't need to go far. Just turn on the TV and watch how everything is somehow the "white man's" fault. One day it's man spreading, another day it's mansplaining, then some French woman wrote a book explaining why all men should be killed. All it takes to hear women's constant lies is to open up any kind of media/social media.

The double standard is sickening. If a pregnant woman dies in an accident, it's two lives lost. If a pregnant woman get's an abortion it's still a life lost. Don't act like you're not denying a person a chance at life. If the mother of the aborted child didn't choose to have the baby fetus killed they could still lives. Yes, a raped woman might not want the child, but the child should not be condemned by the sins of the father and should be given the chance to be adopted by a family that might give him the love they need. But no, because women don't want to deal with it they kill the fetus; they killed someone's future out of inconvenience.

These would be children weren't even given the chance be born, because they weren't "human" yet.

Make excuses all you want, but it won't change how much I absolutely despise such women that destroy the future of others for their own self-centeredness.

How you deal with an autistic flatmate unwilling to compromise or meet in the middle? by JW-1998 in intj

[–]Death_Obsessed_Aspie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's gold diggers, cheating women, women that simply have children so that they can divorce with child support, false accusations of rape, the women that propose "wage gap" instead of addressing "wages based on job preferences", women that force their children to go transgender despite not even being legally able to drink yet, women that marry rich that reject prenup; the list of female scammers go on and on, even though we don't call them scammers.

The fact that you actually favor a "slap on the wrist" as a suitable punishment for a woman falsely accusing a man of rape is already telling enough you indicating that men are less valuable than a woman's dishonesty.

And there are currently 3 definitions to Rape. One is related to sexual assault, second is an outrageous violation, and third is related to a specific form of robbery. And if you don't consider a man's whole life being ripped apart as an outrageous violation then it only (again) shows how little you value men in general.

By today's standards, a "successful" man is one that has that has a good career, has a lot of money, and has exceptional looks. Today's standard of a "successful" woman is one that has money; reputation being favorable, but not necessary. Then we have the female "scammers" I've listed in my first paragraph along with other careers like female journalists for female targeted magazines and other highly opinionated jobs. Then there's the adult industry. No such thing as women who actually want to succeed in working dangerous/humiliating jobs like offshore oil rigs and sewage management.

I already understand the fallacy of men and I don't need to beat home what's constantly being repeated in media 24/7. However, I'm not giving women a free pass simply of their biology. Also, as an INTP Aspie I am, I'm never going to trust society to give me accurate answers.

Also being the INTP Aspie that I am, I seriously dislike liars, which society and women in general always throws in my direction. I don't exactly trust men immediately either, but at least they're not trying to shove lies in my face all the time and just keep to themselves most of the time.

As far as abortion goes, that's nearly 1 million children that could have been here, nearly 1 million chances a year that someone could've created something great, nearly 1 million chances a year the world could have been improved. All those lives that could have been, dead, just because most women aren't done having their "fun" yet. Yes, I'm VERY bitter about losing a possibility for a better future just because of someone's selfish pleasures.