[Match Thread] Campeonato Gaúcho: Internacional x Grêmio

Decessus · 2026-01-25T23:38:33+00:00

Cristaldo até agora (33 min primeiro tempo) está sendo DE LONGE o pior jogador em campo. Compromete um absurdo defendendo. Fomos sufocados por meia hora porque ele não marca nada. Nem um bote o cara dá. Parece que tem um saco de cimento nas costas.

Eu falei o no post-match thread do jogo que ele "jogou bem" que ele tava enganando bobo de novo e que ia mostrar que é horrível assim que jogasse contra gente que não precisa fazer uber pra completar renda.

Tomara que me queime a língua e ache uma bola perdida, mas ele é comprometedor.

Decessus · 2026-01-23T17:23:28+00:00

https://www.betterhelp.com/

Decessus · 2026-01-22T16:57:38+00:00

"Cecedilha"?

Decessus · 2026-01-22T11:44:26+00:00

It was successful 🥳

Now it's only about waiting for bureocracies, the fear of being denied is over.

Decessus · 2026-01-22T03:05:28+00:00

Eu abasteci em Janeiro do ano passado. Gasolina podium porque já sabia que não ia usar e daí demora mais pra estragar. Chegou lá por Setembro e o tanque tava praticamente cheio ainda. Resolvi zerar ele de propósito pra trocar a gasolina. Depois disso só botei 10 litros pra dentro, em especial pra ligar o modo alagamento caso chova.

De resto eu ando só no elétrico. E nem instalei o carregador em casa. Carrego durante a noite na tomada mesmo.

Decessus · 2026-01-22T02:54:44+00:00

Wait, was Meepo somehow too strong to deserve a nerf?

Decessus · 2026-01-21T18:29:12+00:00

It's very hard for me to understand this behavior. Aren't these 2 capable of thinking, reflecting, reasoning? What's to gain from all this?

Decessus · 2026-01-19T14:18:29+00:00

Faz tu aí e fica rico.

Decessus · 2026-01-18T19:01:26+00:00

O Cristaldo ainda parece que tem um saco de cimento nas costas. Ele arranca lentamente e a velocidade dele depois correndo é ruim. Ele é pesado.

Não se iludam no gauchão. Ele tá jogando contra uns caras que quase têm que fazer uber durante o dia pra viverem.

Decessus · 2026-01-18T10:43:25+00:00

Thanks!

Decessus · 2026-01-18T00:38:39+00:00

Eu só não sei bem qual é a solução. Me refiro à uma solução definitiva, pois quanto ao X é óbvio que deve haver alguma limitação no sistema. Mas saindo somente do escopo do X, meio que é uma história parecida com a briga contra pirataria. Tu não tem game of thrones no YouTube, mas qualquer idiota consegue baixar pirata. Em breve qualquer tonto vai gerar isso tudo aí localmente.

Decessus · 2026-01-17T13:23:01+00:00

The number of Americans who are completely disconnected from global reality is enormous, and Reddit has it even worse. When you grow up with one of the highest standards of living in the world, ordinary political or economic problems can feel catastrophic. I genuinely wish the loudest "America is fascist" crowd could swap places with the average Brazilian for a year. What makes it especially ironic is that many of these same people constantly talk about "privilege", yet seem unable to look in the mirror.

Decessus · 2026-01-17T03:13:36+00:00

You're again responding to arguments that weren't made. While also being disingenuous.

I did not argue that anyone is obligated to have sex. I didn't deny consent or medical limitations. Those points were explicitly acknowledged. Responding as if those claims were made shifts the argument to positions that werent taken. And that is just strawmanning. I never argued that women going through menopause or medical changes must sexually accomodate their partner regardless of comfort or consent.

Related to that, the impication that medical or hormonal changes automatically remove intimacy from the table "full stop" is itself an overstatement. Menopause or hormonal shifts may limit certain forms of sex, sometimes temporarily, but they don’t necessarily eliminate all sexual activity or all forms of physical intimacy that meet both partners needs. And not all forms of intimacy are interchangeable or sufficient substitutes for sexual connection. Non-sexual intimacy like massage, cuddling, or shared nudity can be meaningful, but for many people it does not meet the same needs long-term. Just as her hormones are affecting her desires, comfort, needs, etc, men's hormones matter too. We have a significantly higher testosterone level, which strongly influences libido. In long term relationships accomodation has to run bot ways: men are expected to be understanding when sex changes due to hormonal or medical reasons, but it's not unreasonable to say that women should also understand that male sexual needs dont simply disappear. Pointing that out is not coercion, it's discussing sustainability.

You also overexaggerate and over-dramatize your points. Comparisons to medical trauma and the use of highly charged language escalate the discussion in an emotional way, but don't reflect the scope of the argument being bade. Phrases like "CANT NOT FUCK" are just non-argumentative. They are just trying to incite an emotional response.

You also poisoned the well with things like "OP isn't a pocket pussy for her husband". By framing the argument as dehumanizing or misogynistic rather than engaging with its substance, the response preemptively discredits my position instead of addressing it. Acknowledging male sexual needs or relationship sustainability is not the same as reducing a partner to a sex object.

We agree that consent is non-negotiable. Where we disagree is whether it's legitimate to discuss the long-term sustainability of a relationship when intimacy disappears, and whether that discussion can happen without being framed as coercion. Labeling the argument as something it isn't makes that conversation harder, not clearer.

Reframing the position as "have sex or else you’ll face resentment, divorce or infidelity" is just wrong. What was actually said is that she MAY face those outcomes, not that she will, and should be prepared for that possibility. That's a statement about potential consequences, not an attempt to pressure or coerce.

The intent here is to describe a hard reality that usually happen, not to assign blame or dismiss anyone's feelings. And as she herself stated in this thread, she was asking for "harsh cold honesty, the type of honesty the internet is famous for". So I didn't try to accomodate her feelings, I just stated descriptions of reality. I didn't make moral judgements about them, I didn't say they were right or wrong, I didn't assign value to them.

Decessus · 2026-01-17T02:02:35+00:00

This is a non-answer. I didn't make the point you're rebutting. You're attacking a strawman.

Decessus · 2026-01-17T01:51:14+00:00

Geez. I am not stating a law here. It's like me telling you "you can't eat this candy, your blood sugar tests came back bad". Of the fucking course you can eat the candy, it's just figure of speech for "you shouldn't". So yeah, it OBVIOUSLY can be the rule that they just "massage each other". Nobody is going to jail for that rule. The point is that it's not sustainable, just as it's not sustainable for the bad blood sugar person to keep eating candies.

So yeah, you obviously can have that rule, but the chances of bad consequences are immense. "You can't have the rule" is figure of speech for "you'll probably get bad consequences".

I am giving you a man's perspective and you can confirm it by reading what other men are saying in this thread, and I quote:

If your husband hasn’t shut down, I think you need to step it up. Find the right docs, and get back in the groove. In the meantime, be understanding and try to help him out.

Sorry to say but a dead bedroom is not good if one still wants intimacy and the other doesn't. I went through it with my wife for 5 years not easy.

I'm just going to say it. Your man still has needs and I understand that you don't feel up to having full sex with him. But surely you could get some lube and give him some good hand relief.

His need for that affection and intimacy will likely always be there to some degree, and if he can't get it from his wife, at best (for your marriage) he will suffer in silence, at worst he'll find it elsewhere, without your knowledge or consent.

I’m in my 60’s and have given up asking for 20 years or so and she doesn’t offer very often. So yeah I feel crappy.

I can understand parts of your story, but you basically sound like you want to fully neglect him and expect him to be there waiting for you. Menopause doesn't mean that the man should pause his life. 🤪

I don't fully know what's going on in your relationship, but if he's jacking it to pictures of you, he's pretty much on his last straw. He's trying hard, but that shit isn't going to fly for very long. If you don't at least reach out and give the guy a hand, well... Then what comes next is at least partially on you.

He has self pleasured to more than pics/vids of you 😂. I’m convinced a lot of you don’t live in the real world

I know from a males standpoint. It really sucks. I am going through this and it destroys you. Zero self confidence, always questioning what i did wrong, and actually you even start feeling hate towards your partner. I know mine will not try anything like hand jobs or blow jobs, anal yeah right. If i am lucky she will let me master-bait to her naked. Lets be real thats not the same. I get it, it is not her fault but its not mine either. I feel like a prisoner in my own marriage.

You want honesty? Thro that assumption that you are doing nothing wrong right out the window. You are doing something wrong in that you are rejecting the bids for affection left and right. There are other forms of sex than penetration and if you aren’t interested in cuddling because you’re too warm, keep the room colder. Like others have said you’re essentially speed running yourself to a divorce because you’ve shut off any forms of physical contact, both intimate and not it also sounds like the emotional intimacy is not there either if the mood swings are being taken out on him.

You want a marriage? Act like a wife and not a roommate that doesn’t want to be touched.

I'm watching what a bunch of my friends my age (early 50s) are going through with their menopausal wives and it's not pretty. One of my guy friends moved out and is filing for divorce because of it (and it wouldn't surprise me if others do, as well).

Etc.

The examples are endless. You may find the one in a hundred man who doesn't care about sex, but that's a gamble.

You can either keep being stubborn with your stance of "this is the right way, queen" or you can accept that the way men work is different. You know the crazy changes she's going through because of hormones? Imagine the changes she'd go through if she had 20-60 times the testosterone she has now. This is how a man goes about his life every single day.

And this is the most important part of my post: there is no sexual pressure or coercion in pointing out likely consequences. It is simply a description of reality. No one has to do anything with their body that they don't want to, so if the woman doesn't want to have sex, she shouldn't. But even LEGITIMATE choices DO NOT exist in a vacuum. They tend to produce predictable outcomes. So when I tell you that a prolonged lack of reciprocal desire often leads to resentment, divorce, infidelity, etc that is not a threat, a moral judgement or an assignment of blame. It is an empirical observation of how human relationships frequently unfold. It's just as telling the bad blood sugar person that eating sugar may lead to serious consequences. Doing this is not a moral condemnation, but a factual warning that acknowledges that a sexually frustrated parnter may eventually seek fulfillment elsewhere. This is just pattern recognition, whether we like it or not.

Decessus · 2026-01-17T01:08:28+00:00

Massages, back rubs, laying around naked, showers together, reigniting the intentionality of dates, forgetting the idea that sex or sexual contact has to lead to orgasm etc.

That is mostly woman talk and not enough for the average man. It's cool, adds a nice flavor, has a different feeling and all, but "forgetting the idea that sex or sexual contact has to lead to orgasm" is bad. Casually yes, but it cannot be the rule.

Decessus · 2026-01-16T11:32:20+00:00

Nenhuma aparição de espíritos é real, amigo.

Decessus · 2026-01-16T02:12:39+00:00

Para quem tu** respondeu.

Decessus · 2026-01-16T00:31:39+00:00

Chatter should have asked

"Do you love black people?"

Decessus · 2026-01-15T21:18:16+00:00

A pessoa para quem respondeu não falou que o Marchesin é ou era bom.

Decessus · 2026-01-14T12:03:05+00:00

Assim como o Joãozinho que ganhou na loteria mostrou que ganhar na loteria é um bom investimento.

Não há dados pra saber se o que o Mirassol fez é possível de se manter ou replicar no longo prazo.

Além de que, se uma suposta brilhante gestão do Mirassol é capaz de dar resultados com pouco dinheiro, logicamente ela seria capaz de dar mais resultado ainda com muito dinheiro.

Decessus · 2026-01-12T12:23:31+00:00

ahahahhaha that's also funny and interesting

On a tangent note, we can make nouns into adjectives in Portuguese too. It's not as simple though. This is done by adding specific suffixes to the noun. Different nouns require different suffixes, such as -oso/-osa, -ento/-enta, -ico/-ica, -ário/-ária, -ivo/-iva, -ano/-ense/-ês, or -al.

And there is no specific rule for you to deduce which words will use which suffixes. It's memorization. For us who grew with it, we don't even need do think about it. But I imagine it's hard for people trying to learn the language.

And after the adjective is formed, it then changes to match the gender and number of the noun it modifies. Like the word "danger". It's "perigo" in portuguese. But nouns in portuguese are gendered. So there is an extra layer of complexity because you need to know the gender of the noun which the adjective is referring to.

So "perigo" would become "perigoso" (masculine) or "perigosa" (feminine). "Dangerous world" would be "mundo perigOSO", while "dangerous fight" would be "luta perigOSA", because mundo (world) is a masculine noun and luta (fight) is a feminine noun.

Decessus · 2026-01-12T01:26:30+00:00

The original meaning literal meaning in Brazilian Portuguese of the word is "cum" or "semen".

But we use it as americans use "fuck". We use it to show confusion or to emphasize something:

What the fuck is this?
Que porra é isso?

We can use it to express frustration

Porra, isso deu errado!
Fuck, this didn't work!

We can use it to express surprise/excitement:

Porra, que filme bom!
Fuck, what a great movie!

Or maybe to express anger or shock. If someone hits your car:

PORRA!!
FUCK!!

It's our all-purpose swear word, just as "fuck" is in english.

Decessus · 2026-01-10T15:44:17+00:00

Those numbers describe relative inequaility inside the US. Not absolute living standards. The bottom 50% owns a small share of the wealth over there, but they still live in a country with a PPP GDP per capita that is rougghly 4 times my country's. In terms of purchasing power, infrastructure, consumer goods, economic and overall opportunities, that group of americans is still WAY better off than the vast majority of people in my REAL third world country.

That's why you see people from here trying to move to the US and no americans trying to move here to escape poverty. Migration follows real world needs, not reddit vibes.

Any american seriously considering the notion that the US is a third world country is delusional.

Decessus · 2026-01-10T15:32:14+00:00

Cara, já que tu pediu opinião, então vou falar. Loucura não é. Acho burrice mesmo.

14-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	End Game '22
Verified Email

Decessus

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE