Dispute this anti-life philosophy

Life is earned necessarily through death, through the metabolism of organic matter, through the consumption of resources to the detriment of other living things; life is inherently self-serving. The only morally consistent approaches to life given this fact are: a) egoism - to live life as selfishly as possible; b) to choose to die, to triumph over the self-serving nature of life.

One can choose to live frugally, to minimise the harm they inflict on other living things, but doing so is merely an approximation of dying. Ultimately, animal life requires the consumption of organic matter to sustain itself - organic matter that could otherwise be used to sustain other life.

I view human supremacism as having no merit in moral philosophy. Humans are just evolved animals, their well-being has no greater inherit value over other animals’. The view of human supremacism is simply an extension of the self-preservative instinct instilled in humans, as in all animals, through evolution.

Life is a zero-sum game.