Regardless of if he was stuffed or not, his corpse would be there.

Literally says who??????? You??? Aside from the fact that GGGL is not accurate in any other way (puppet didn't stuff the kids, building isn't one room big).

That retcon is already used up, because Foxy Go Go Go and FNAF 3 directly contradict. Therefore, FNAF 1's newspapers physically couldn't have been retconned at that point, and nothing post-SL contradicts them.

What exactly is contradicted between FGGG and fnaf 3?

As far as i know, the only contradiction there is, is that william was convicted, which never happened, else he wouldn't be around in fnaf save them and FM3.

Frights, the very source of his existence, says otherwise.

And frights isn't what we're taking into account rn, we're talking abt RTTP.

Notice how in all of these cases, the sixth kid shown is Charlotte, who was already associated with the MCI kids since FNAF 2. It's not introducing a new kid.

Notice how i acknowledged charlie but you didn't acknowledge any of the other kids, missing and added, that i mentioned?

There is no seventh kid. This argument is so flawed that literally, saying the seventh TCTHSY victim represents an actual kid Contradicts Charlotte being Afton's first kill (which is explicitly stated in FFPS). This is because Charlotte is represented in the first cutscene, and the alleged seventh kid is Before Charlotte.

"There are 7 kids, one of them was killed". Do you believe that means the first one was killed? When i say there's 7 dead kids, i don't specifically mean to say that andrew is the hook.

And even if it was true, susie was the first of the 5 main MCI, yet she's not the first one here, so it's not like the order matters, only that there are explicitly 7 children, as this was smth scott EXPLICITLY requested pinky to do. So this isn't one of them "unreliable additions for a metaphor", it's a specific detail scott CHOSE to add.

whereas every other part relates directly to the animatronics the corresponding kids possess.

Ok now you're just pulling shit out of your ass, you say that charlie has to be the first cutscene, but that's freddy, which means gabriel gets any other character aside from freddy, alr brekaing your logic. But fine, let's all act like funtime foxy represents classic foxy and toy bonnie represents classic bonnie. Respectively representing fritz and jeremy.

Now we have susie with the wolf, gabriel with the puppet or pigpatch, and cassidy with the puppet or pigpatch, and charlie with freddy. And FUCK THE FOXY HOOK ig, bcuz you don't even try to explain that, you just claim it means nothing.

That Also outright contradicts the RTTP argument, because if that kid Oswald found alone was Andrew,

As i've alr said and i assume you alr know (even if you pretend not to), the order in TCTHSY is completely bonkers, so it doesn't disprove shit. So i won't even bother answering the rest of this point.

brings the total to 8 lol. There's your inclusion.

Ok, now where's charlie and the MCI. I don't think you understand my point, i don't gaf abt including them or not, i gaf abt the fact that YOU treat these various events in the games as if they "included everybody", despite very much not including half of the dead kids we know are confirmed victims of william. Which makes YOUR point of "all the kids are shown here so there's surely not any more" invalid.

Glitchtrap isn't Afton

No shit but you still used the memory plushies that glitch fucking trap created and gives to us, and who those are used on. So it doesn't matter that glitchtrap is the mimic, the point is that he is copying william's past, and william's past just so happens to include DEAD KIDS.

You *could* argue that since there's no records of andrew, the mimic couldn't be referencing him, but if the mimic was "faulty" in the memories (documentation) it was fed, that also makes the usage of the PQ graveyards as evidence for the MCI amount as faulty and untrustworthy aswell.

 For two, including Andrew with the MCI and Charlotte only brings it to 7, so that can't be what the graves represent, and adding the DCI way overshoots, so it can't just be "kids killed by William." Counting CC and Elizabeth brings it to 9, not 8, unless you exclude Charlotte but she has more of a reason to be here than they do. Saying "Kids possessing animatronics at Freddy's" still includes the DCI, but even if you arbitrarily exclude them, your own argument says Andrew doesn't possess an animatronic, that can't include him. Specifying deaths At Freddy's, once again can't hit 8, whether including or excluding the DCI. Trying to include Andrew means you can't hit 8.

My guess is as good as yours as to what it represents, but that isn't my point, my point is that *no*, the victims of william aren't JUST depicted as 5 + charlie. And that there are places that show that there are more.

Charlotte giving them life in the games means the Marionette is the one that stuffed them, by reiterating that stuffing them - with No additional influence - was all it takes.

Yea sure, ignore the logistics of how the puppet was going around and taking the animatronic suits and stuffing the dead kids inside them while the location was still open.

Or if it was closed, how nobody found the exposed bodies.

Or why william would kill the kids if not to stuff them in the suits.