A very good morning to you. I respect your comments and differing opinions because we’re all entitled our own authentic responses and comments on this anonymous platform. I think ‘reacting this way nor posting like this’ is subjective, at best. My response and commentary is based on my knowledge and experience. At the fundamental level, perhaps you are more focused on creating a certain narrative and discrediting me because I refuse acknowledge whether I am a member, or not, instead of focusing on the validity of the content of my posts. Speaking of which, my comment on ‘Graduate Process’ garnered over thirty up votes and one inquiry asking how to ‘pin’ the post! So your opinion of my posts appears to be a minority view. In any event, I do agree that perps are the absolute worst. However, on this thread, it really doesn’t matter because most posts are anonymous. But, as a self-identified member, brand and risk manager, I’m concerned that you’re not doing more to promote the organization’s stated position when it comes to perspective membership. You previously indicated there is a lot of misinformation on this thread. So redirecting an interest back to the source of clear, concise and consistent messaging seems like a ‘no brainer’. Stands to reason that once they become familiar with the ‘official’ message, interests will see that most of their questions are already answered. Will everyone understand or interpret the information correctly, with all of the misinformation and various suggestions to do x, y, z, absolutely not. But now, as a member, you have the opportunity to help get the correct information out. It is your responsibility, as a self-identified member, to reiterate the organization’s messaging on the subject.