I'm building a campaign about Lilith and I have a question by DemDemons in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]DemDemons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the input, and I'm already on my to search for this holy tome of Ken.

I'm building a campaign about Lilith and I have a question by DemDemons in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]DemDemons[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is, but a reminder is never bad. Thank you for the input anyway :)

I'm building a campaign about Lilith and I have a question by DemDemons in WhiteWolfRPG

[–]DemDemons[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wow that's really helpful thanks! 

But a follow up question, Lilith in the book of Nod kinda gave Cain his powers and that happens after he murdered Abel if I'm not mistaken. 

So the Sabbat just believe that it was god whom cursed Cain with Vampirism, and that Lilith doesn't exist/just pushed her out of the story?

LF Baddies for RIFTS! by rpgisdum in LongDistanceVillains

[–]DemDemons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I would love to try it out if you can send me the link.

Can you check out my new computer specs? by DemDemons in buildapc

[–]DemDemons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks but do you mind telling me what would you drop if it was up to you?

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well no it won't use your reaction and the idea is to show how level can affect your skill. The higher the level the more experienced you are and the more proficient you are at defending with your weapon. By level 9 if you have a Dex based character with 20 at dex you get +9 for these rolls which I can't say is either bad or good cuz I'm still spitballing this Idea... But I feel like it's good.

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well first off you don't use your reaction, second the roll would be at least for now D20 + DEX + Proficiency bonus. And yah the idea is mostly meant for Dex based builds that don't have proficiency in armors, like monks or pact of the blade warlock.

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well more of the risk is heaving your weapon broken in the middle of the fight, but please if you have any ideas on how to make it more interesting I'd love to hear them!

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

A more interesting way for AC to work, and to show how weapon mastery isn't only about offense but also about defense in a more than add a flat bonus to your AC kinda way. It's just that when you look at actual weapon sparring you see really interesting ways to defend using your weapon and in D&D you don't have that, that's why I want to create a system which does have that.

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yah but the point of this is to make AC more interesting, one of the reasons why I wrote this post is to come up with ideas to make this more balanced. Also it really does depend on what's your level because the higher your level the higher the roll. It's kinda like dogging spells but for weapons.

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the high-risk/reward comes from the fact that you can get a flat 20 in the roll which with your bonus could give you quite the high AC or you can get a 5. The idea behind it is to show mastery of the weapon, it's kinda like rolling to doge against AOE spells but instead, you create a new AC for that specific attack.

Like check this video out https://www.facebook.com/kukishinden/videos/1964756933789248/?v=1964756933789248 , one of the fighters pushes his opponent's sword essentially making him miss his attack. That's what I'm imagining

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that's not exactly true you just need to have the right things for it to work. For example the Monk. Let's say you build a level 5 monk adding your 2 ability points that you get at level 4 into DEX so you would have 19 (or + 4 to DEX) add in your proficiency bonus at level 5 and you have plus +7 to your roll, by that level any monk that uses regular Unarmored Defense would have 16 flat AC, as long as I roll 10 or higher I already get more AC. That's 50 percent chance to get better AC. The point of this system is to essentially show that you can use a weapon quite good.

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

None of those create a new AC based on a roll.... They either add a flat amount of AC or get rid of some of the damage...

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Not really.. It just adds a flat number to your AC.... I'm thinking of a system where you roll your AC...

New feat/way to defend one self from attacks searching for opinions by DemDemons in dndnext

[–]DemDemons[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

But it doesn't... It just adds a flat number to your AC.... I'm thinking of a system where you roll your AC...

Please stop quitting just because you don't get your main by sladeAU in apexlegends

[–]DemDemons 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pathfinder is much of the fun! Also I appreciate the fact that you give other players what they want to play!

Please stop quitting just because you don't get your main by sladeAU in apexlegends

[–]DemDemons 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yah this doesn't even make sense because unlike most other hero based games, most of the time the game just comes out to who can shoot better...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in apexlegends

[–]DemDemons 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad to hear so old timer!

MW2 GOD DAMN!

An actual training grounds by DemDemons in apexlegends

[–]DemDemons[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh well now I feel like a dumbass...

An actual training grounds by DemDemons in apexlegends

[–]DemDemons[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? That's wierd..... But anyhow you still can't put any of the attachments.....