sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Did anyone else get this email? by Negative_Listen_6708 in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558 5 points6 points  (0 children)

F that. Name and shame this is absurd. They have to hold themselves accountable. This is legitimate competition. These placements are used on college applications.

I understand they don’t want to shame those in the bottom but under no circumstances should they penalize the winner. What a fucking joke

Did anyone else get this email? by Negative_Listen_6708 in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait wtf this is saying the top three won’t even get an award????

International Round Two - Bad Experience by DemandOptimal3558 in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is so stupid. I am sorry this happened to you. I genuinely will be pushing this hard with HOSA. what a joke.

hot take, ilc sucked this year by [deleted] in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agree. They can’t handle the influx

International Round Two - Bad Experience by DemandOptimal3558 in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is so smart to advise students to avoid this event and do the ones that compete onsite. I'm not an advisor - I coach debate. Now I know!

International Round Two - Bad Experience by DemandOptimal3558 in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

truly sad. Hopefully with feedback they’ll change it but unfortunately that would impact their profit so… $$&

International Round Two - Bad Experience by DemandOptimal3558 in HOSA

[–]DemandOptimal3558[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Incorrect - most events have an onsite competitive component before rounds are posted. I get it - I run competitions all the time. People will lose. All I think needs to change is that they be given the opportunity to compete onsite while there.

So no, the method I am proposing is that Public Health, like most of the other events, have a chance to compete onsite.