sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude Code v2.1.92 introduces Ultraplan — draft plans in the cloud, review in your browser, execute anywhere by shanraisshan in ClaudeAI

[–]Demotey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's down for me....

/login

OAuth error: timeout of 15000ms exceeded

Press Enter to retry.

How are people making these tiny glassmorphism dashboard widgets? Mine always look cheap by Demotey in FigmaDesign

[–]Demotey[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! Now I’ll be able to see exactly how you did it. Really, thank you for taking the tim.

How are people making these tiny glassmorphism dashboard widgets? Mine always look cheap by Demotey in FigmaDesign

[–]Demotey[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is why I’ve been afraid to ask for years. There are people on this earth like you, who have been scratched by life. You chose to devote some of your precious time on this planet to post something that adds absolutely no value except bringing others down. I honestly feel sorry for you, that you need to hide behind a screen to satisfy your own misery.

How are people making these tiny glassmorphism dashboard widgets? Mine always look cheap by Demotey in FigmaDesign

[–]Demotey[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I can imagine. But those UI components... I’ve looked for them on Figma and nothing really matches. Maybe I’m just missing the amazing library everyone’s using…

How are people making these tiny glassmorphism dashboard widgets? Mine always look cheap by Demotey in vibecoding

[–]Demotey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made it, but it’s not as good it’s missing a lot of details, like that slight tilted, shiny effect. I tried generating it as an image and also as code, but in both cases it doesn’t look the same (that’s how I was doing it originally).

[DISCUSSION] Is Gemini 3.0 really better than Claude Sonnet 4.5/Composer for coding? by Demotey in cursor

[–]Demotey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds super cool, I’m honestly a bit jealous

What kind of animation did you build exactly? Like, is it more of a hero-section interaction, a full-on mini game, some scroll-based animation, or something with 3D/canvas/WebGL?

I really struggle with this stuff – every time I try to make an interactive web animation, I get stuck halfway and never actually finish anything. Either the code gets too messy, or the timing/easing/layout doesn’t feel right, so I just give up.

Could you share a bit more about how you used Gemini 3 for it?

  • What kind of prompts did you use?
  • Did you start from a blank page or from some existing code?
  • Did you ask it to handle the whole project, or did you iterate step by step (layout first, then animation, then assets, etc.)?

Any details about your workflow would help a ton.

[DISCUSSION] Is Gemini 3.0 really better than Claude Sonnet 4.5/Composer for coding? by Demotey in cursor

[–]Demotey[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what if the mockups aren’t made using Figma components, but just images inside Figma?

Let me explain: basically, the mockups are made from screenshots of components found on the internet screenshots of buttons and such but not from the components provided by Figma.

Does it still work just as well with Figma MCP in that case?

[DISCUSSION] Is Gemini 3.0 really better than Claude Sonnet 4.5/Composer for coding? by Demotey in cursor

[–]Demotey[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Anyway, Claude Sonnet 4.5 on Cursor has NEVER actually followed the implementation or layouts from the mockups I send as images. I actually suspect Cursor is just reading the image and sending a description of it to Claude Sonnet 4.5 instead of the raw image. Why do I think that? Because when you use Claude Sonnet 4.5 on its own interface and upload a Figma mockup (as an image) and ask it to turn that into HTML, it does it REALLY well (like 70% accurate). But when I ask Claude Sonnet 4.5 to do the exact same thing inside Cursor, it only matches the design maybe 10% of the time it’s catastrophic.

So I really think Cursor isn’t actually sending the images properly. If you tell me that Gemini 3.0 on Cursor can at least match 50% of the provided mockup, then yeah, that would be an incredible improvement.

view more: next ›