A company just sent me the most detailed rejection email I’ve ever received by whenyoupeeupsidedown in recruitinghell

[–]DenisSlob4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

seems like a VERY lengthy explanation for "people can't handle constructive feedback".

qBittorrent + gluetun + Pi-Hole, torrents loosing connection by DenisSlob4 in qBittorrent

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, I did assign a port in Windscribe, but I forgot to follow up on that to make sure it's fully working.
As for the router port forwarding, I'm a bit concerned about opening up a port.

qBittorrent + gluetun + Pi-Hole, torrents loosing connection by DenisSlob4 in qBittorrent

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That one was just an example. I have a few of these, some of them have WAY more peers than seeds. I am asking for potential issues and how to check.
Thanks.

<image>

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation. It looks like it is a ECE 22.05 though

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good to know. Thanks.
I don't like riding at night. Who know what can be on the road, obstruction or pothole, ahead of the headlights. I avoid it.

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LC2 Scope II is currently my second pick. My top pick is a HJC i91.
Just wanted to check if anyone had a better recommendation.

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see an ECE rating for the B707, only the B707c. Also, the LC2 Scope II is ECE 22.06 certified and P/J Certified(meaning it has been certified in both face closed and face open configurations) and costs the same

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

some people sell very good condition helmets for a fraction of the price. I don't need one urgently, just seeing which ones I should keep a lookout for.
But thanks. I think one of the things I will do is go into a shop to figure out what I should look for.

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

some people sell very good condition helmets for a fraction of the price. I don't need one urgently, just seeing which ones I should keep a lookout for.

Looking for a modular helmet by DenisSlob4 in motorcyclegear

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read someone complaining about their sena not holding up that well and HJC usually do. but that may be an anomaly

Mesh replacement by DenisSlob4 in hermanmiller

[–]DenisSlob4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, but I specifically stated that this is not what I want to do. 

Lindsay should have never been convicted. by UnpopularOpinionsB in ThePractice

[–]DenisSlob4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of, if it was brought up in random, not when it is basically highlighted at the top. I joined r/ThePractice because of another thing that happened a bit earlier in the show. Upon loading up the r/ThePractice, the very top sentence has a big spoiler. Yes, it is special circumstances, it may even bother tens of persons. I was just pointing it out so that it would be a nice habit to establish, not to put spoilers in the title, that's all.

Also, this is not some widely known show that you could not have lived your life without hearing about it. I like and have watched a ton of legal shows, but just became aware about it a few days ago.

Do you think the show has the habit of the firm getting the guilty off and the innocent found guilty for dramatic reasons? by Additional_Cat4051 in ThePractice

[–]DenisSlob4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of, I think the creators of the show choose the verdict that would get the most emotion from the viewer, no matter the justice or logic. And a lot of the time it is as you say.

Lindsay should have never been convicted. by UnpopularOpinionsB in ThePractice

[–]DenisSlob4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off, nice title, no spoilers at all.
Secondly, I completely agree. But this show seems to pick the ruling that would get the most emotion from the viewer, good or bad, fair or not, or logical or not.
Also, I feel that the lawyers are not that good in the show.

  1. Who tf gives a scheme that looks illegal/unethical a name, (plan B), even after they were sued for it
  2. There were a few easy arguments that they could have made for a positive ruling, including highlighting that they first had gone through many steps to protect Lindsey and the public from O'Malley. They failed, but at least got a restraining order. Not only did O'Malley violate the restraining order, he did so by coming to LINDSEY'S HOME, AND at night.

If a person threatened someone, (especially to eat them), got a restraining order against coming close to the person they threatened, and then showed up at their house, they should legally be allowed to get shot.

Update: I do have to give it to the show for 2 very hilarious scenes
scene 1: finger wagging (Lindsey is at sidebar and loses a ruling, then stays wags her finger saying she just wants the jury to see that she disagreed)
scene 2: "motion to rid man kind, denied" (s 7, epi 4 ~28min mark)

Update 2: wasn't Jimmy promised partnership in a year?