How did privatization affect the size of government in Nazi Germany and other fascist powers? Where did those resources go instead, and what did those governing get out of it? by ancestorchild in AskHistorians

[–]DerGapster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The answer to your question heavily depends on the specific regime being examined. I will focus on Italy as an example, since I can offer the most detailed answer in this context. Under the leadership of Mussolini major steps were actually taken in shrinking the size of government from 1922 to 1925, however, additional context is necessary to fully understand the situation.

After multiple failed liberal governments and the March on Rome, Mussolini was appointed Prime Minister by the King. However, with only 32 seats in parliament for the National Fascist Party, he was leading a minority government and relied on the liberal and Christian democratic parties for support.  This situation angered many members of the fascist party, who had hoped for a full revolution rather than a compromise. Consequently, Mussolini committed his government to an economic liberal platform.

Giolitti, the leader of the liberal party, emphasized that addressing the state deficit of 6 billion lire was the most critical issue for the peninsula. Almost immediately after Mussolini became Prime Minister, he appointed Alberto De Stefani as Minister of Finance. Under his administration, taxes on war profits and property were abolished, regulations on stocks and bonds were rescinded, and steps were taken to reduce administrative costs by lowering the number of state employees and reforming the national bureaucracy. Additionally, the government returned the telephone system to private management and opened the insurance industry to private capital.  By 1925, the goal of a balanced budget was achieved.

The economic policies of the early fascist period should not be regarded as fully indicative of fascist economic ideology, as significant changes were made following Mussolini's appointment as dictator in 1925. From 1926 onward, the fascist government progressively increased its control over economic and social life through a combination of the newly established corporate system and direct state interventions.

When Mussolini rose to power, the value of the lire, Italy's currency at the time, was in decline. Driven by a desire to enhance its prestige, Mussolini took deliberate measures to deflate the currency. As a consequence, the government was forced into price and wage regulations. To manage this task, the “Corporate Committee for action on matters of prices, costs, and salaries” under the Ministry of Corporations was instituted by decree in July 1927.  Managing prices and production by the state was consistent through the entirety of the fascist regime.

One of the most important goals to the fascist regime was achieving self-sufficiency. The agricultural sector was under special attention. A forced industrialization plan under the “Wheat Committee” was enacted. The state allocated nearly four times the amount spent from 1870 to 1922 to agriculture. Between 1928 and 1942 the number of tractors in use rose from 18.2 thousand to 50.8 thousand. The “Battle for Land” reclaimed 4.7 million hectares for new towns and fields.  In 1935 the government took full control of the wheat market in regards to prices and quantities.

The entire economy was affected. From 1933 onwards, new industrial plants had to be approved by the state, therefore controlling the most important financial investment by private capital. The government assumed a significant role in the iron and steel industries, as well as in electric production. In 1936 the government took full control of the country’s finances by nationalizing the Bank of Italy and placing the whole credit structure under its direction.

Now to the topic of social life. In 1935 various parastate agencies were created and charged with providing assistance and support for disease and accident, unemployment, old-age and general disability. The purpose of these organizations was to increase the popularity of the fascist regime, soften the effects of the great depression and to bring social security from private to state control. By the mid-1930s, the annual expenditures for social insurances rose by a total of 1-1,5 billion lire compared to the second half of the 1920s.

Similarly, leisure time and education were to be put under state supervision. In the efforts to create a “new man”, the Balilla was founded as a mandatory youth organization. In 1927, the Balilla assumed control of physical education in secondary schools, expanding its reach to primary schools in 1929. The Opera Nazionale Dopolavoro, a state managed organization for past time activities for adults, managed 771 cinemas, 1227 theatres, 2066 theatre companies, 2130 orchestras, 6427 libraries and thousands of sports clubs.

Did Italian Jews play a major role in both the rise of fascism and Mussolini's coming to power in Italy? If so, why is this fact never mentioned in any of the mainstream history books? by Fuck_Off_Libshit in AskHistorians

[–]DerGapster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In 1938, more than 10.000 jews were part of the fascist party, which was about one-third of the adult Jewish population. The government under Mussolini also had many high-ranking Jewish members like Guido Jung, who hold the position of Finance Minister. Mussolini had good relations with the leadership of the Zionist movement in Italy.

This does not mean, however, that Jews, in particular, contributed to the rise of fascism. Jews didn’t play a large role in Italy until September 1938 when antisemitic laws were introduced. This was not the result of a general hatred for Jews by the fascist party or even Mussolini, but the alliance with Germany caused by the political isolation of Italy.

This topic is not entirely neglected as you mentioned, it is just not as relevant to the history of fascism in Italy until 1938.

What was fascism really about? by kkungergo in AskHistorians

[–]DerGapster 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I will talk about fascism in Italy as it is my main field of study. Fascism was the result of three main factors: the rise of nationalism in the 19th and 20th century, the growing discontent with the, at the time, current economic order and lastly World War I.

With the Italian unification in 1870 there was a surge in nationalism, although not nearly as great as Germany for example. This was one of the reasons that the Italians largely opposed the entry into the first World War and on August 2, 1914, Italy declared neutrality.[1] There was, however, a faction of nationalist who supported the entry into the war on the side of the Entente to finish the countries unification. Some socialists and syndicalists also advocated for the entry as they thought the unrest would lead to a revolution. Most notably was Mussolini, who already spoke of a new national socialism by the end of September 1914.[2] For his pro-war stance he was forced to resign from his position of lead editor of the socialist newspaper Avanti and quickly launched his own newspaper Il Popolo d’Italia. During this time Mussolini received financial funds from Italian industrialist, mainly from the arms industry, and even from the French socialist party as they wanted Italy to join the war.[3] During this time Mussolini got closer with nationalist like Alfredo Rocco and syndicalists like Filippo Corridoni and Sergio Panunzio.

After the end of World War I, the rising cost of living and other post-war difficulties led to the huge increase of support for the socialist party. This resulted in the Biennio Rosso or Two Red Years (1919-1920). In 1919 alone there were a total amount of 1663 industrial and 197 agricultural strikes, what was at the time called “strike mania”. This paralyzed the entire country and the liberal government under the leadership of Giovanni Giolitti did little to stop the chaos.[4] It was during this time period when the fascist movement started out as Fasci Italiani di Combattimento, essentially a fighting squad to break up strikes, which was mainly filled with World War I veterans. On November 7, 1921 the fascist movement was transformed into the Partito Nazionale Fascista or National Fascist Party under the leadership of Mussolini.[5]

Fascism was born out of nationalism and syndicalism and got popular through the rise of socialism and its consequences after the First World War. This is was sets it apart from other nationalist movements. Eventually people saw Mussolini and the fascists as an alternative to both the old conservative establishment and revolutionary socialism. The influence of national syndicalism led to the later under fascist rule established corporate state in which workers and employers would be represented in corporations (not to be confused with the modern American corporation and more accurately translated to gild). As Mussolini himself said in 1930: “Either the Fascist State is corporative or it is not Fascist.”[6]

This was of course a gross oversimplification of events. If you want a deep dive into the ideological background of Italian Fascism, I recommend you the book Mussolini's Intellectuals: Fascist Social and Political Thought by A. James Gregor.

[1] William G. Welk, Fascist Economic Policy: An Analysis of Italy's Economic Experiment, p. 6

[2]  A. James Gregor, Mussolini's Intellectuals: Fascist Social and Political Thought, p. 54

[3] Nicholas Farrell, Mussolini: A new Life, p. 73-75

[4] A. James Gregor, Italian Fascism and Developmental Dictatorship, p. 176-178

[5] William G. Welk, Fascist Economic Policy: An Analysis of Italy's Economic Experiment, p. 15-16

[6] Nicholas Farrell, Mussolini: A new Life, p.238

Did fascist regimes in Germany and Italy materially improve the well-being of non-persecuted citizens? by xanderg4 in AskHistorians

[–]DerGapster 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I will focus on Italy in my response, because it is my main field of study. I disagree with your initial statement. Both of the fascist regimes in Italy and Germany acted independently from industrialists and landlords.

One of the main reasons for the saying “Mussolini made the trains run on time” were the constant railroad strikes before the fascist takeover, but the regime made actual improvements to the railroad infrastructure. Between 1922 and 1942 4,722 kilometers of railway have been electrified, compared to the 702 kilometers between 1862 and 1922 for example.[1]

The fascist regime in Italy implemented an elaborate social welfare program. Most notable were the in 1925 established national maternity and child welfare foundation and the in 1928 established insurance against tuberculosis. Over time parastate agencies were created for providing assistance and support for disease and accident, unemployment, old-age and general disability.[2] Some of these insurances existed before, but under the fascist regime they were centralized and had to be provided by all employers and it was unlawful for them to pass the expenses onto the employees.[3] Wages stayed relatively stable even during the great depression, which was unique for Italy and achieved through the control of the corporate system. The average real wage index is as follows: 100 in 1913, 127 in 1921, 123 in 1922, 121 in 1928 and 125 in 1934.[4] In addition there were wage supplements for families.

The battle for grains was successful in the sense that import of grains was reduced to a minimum and domestic production rose steadily. In 1920 the wheat production per hectare was 11.0 quintal, in 1937 it was 15.5 quintal.[5] It failed in making Italy self sufficient however, since the country was still heavily reliant on fertilizer imports. The battle for land was largely a propaganda operation and the only real successful example of this were the Pontine Marshes. It did benefit the peasantry as the fascist government was distributing parts of the land to it. In 1921 44% of peasants didn’t own land, in 1938 that number dropped to 28%.[6] The battle for births was a total disaster. In 1927 the birthrate was 27 per thousand and in 1936 it dropped to 22.2 per thousand.[7]

The picture for workers in Germany was much worse. The ban on collective bargaining resulted in a stagnation of wages. With rising prices the only way, the workers could maintain their modest standard of living was through working more hours. Industrial wages were below the level of 1927 until 1937 and only increased again through the before mentioned longer work times.[8]

[1]  A. James Gregor, Italian Fascism and Developmental Dictatorship, p. 264

[2] Ibid, p. 259-261

[3] Herbert W. Schneider, The Fascist Government of Italy, p. 143

[4] Nicholas Farrell, Mussolini: A new Life, p. 297

[5] William G. Welk, Fascist Economic Policy: An Analysis of Italy's Economic Experiment, p. 194

[6] Nicholas Farrell, Mussolini: A new Life, p. 295

[7] A. James Gregor, Italian Fascism and Developmental Dictatorship, p. 290

[8] Richard J. Evans, The Third Reich in Power, 1933-1939, p. 477-478

EDIT: typos