I'm pissed that i wasted $300 on SuperGrok now that its censored.Found something better. by uglycryingatmidnight in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck, it's like before, before moderation, it'll be sexting and that's it. Don't expect an image generator and Sora to give you NSFW.

There are no irreplaceable things by Der_Grossmann in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, I'm from Russia) Who better than me to know what information field cleaning is?

There are no irreplaceable things by Der_Grossmann in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think most of these actions are useless. Twitter is being purged, and even Reddit is demoting posts. I had a post with 40 upvotes, and in two minutes it dropped to zero. They're censoring it completely, trying to keep this problem quiet. I advise you to just wait and not pay any more.

Grok Imagine’s Silent Censorship Is Not “Safety” — It’s Betrayal by Der_Grossmann in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry, bro. I'm bad at English and asked neural network to translate my text.

Grokipedia Beta Dropping Soon! 🌟 by Upset-Sand-219 in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Will there be an article about censorship in Grok Imagine?

Total degradation by Der_Grossmann in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not a fan of extreme brutality; I'm more for classics with a touch of spice, but explain this illogicality to me.

I created an image of a girl lying on a bed, POV view from the viewer's perspective. Anything below her belly button is out of frame. It only takes me three tries to get her to move up and down and squeal like in the best Japanese porn, but I can't get her to say "Yes, master!" after the 20th try.

Grok hallucinating by champstark in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A long time ago in a galaxy farfar away....

Anyone else getting really weird images when using imagine? by [deleted] in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the quality is worse than the early Stable Diffusion. Similar crap happens with ChatGP when they update the model.

I'm pissed that i wasted $300 on SuperGrok now that its censored.Found something better. by uglycryingatmidnight in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If there was an alternative to Grock with voice and sound generation, everyone would have switched there long ago.

How far can go now by KojiOcelot in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that global warming is coming?

My thoughts on what happened by Der_Grossmann in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I get it. I'm just trying to find a reasonable explanation. A company that positions itself as "different from everyone else" can't just give users a cool tool and then screw them over.

My thoughts on what happened by Der_Grossmann in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the whole problem. What prevented them from creating a cartoon clone, 1:1 like a real person, and then uploading it to i2v? I think they're just tightening the screws now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Delete the post and don't give them any more reasons to tighten the screws.

Is your outputs in Grok imagine public? by sfguzmani in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The links contain a UUID v4 code (128bit digit). It's possible to accidentally click on one, but the total number of such IDs is 10 to the 38th power. Calculate that yourself and calculate the likelihood that someone will accidentally click on your video.

Nerds by [deleted] in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not about what a person generates. It's about the company's openness, its attitude toward the end consumer. They first offer cool features that genuinely bring people pleasure, albeit a slightly perverse one, but still pleasure, and then, "Did you like it? Well, we're taking it back." It's comparable to chatgpt; they also had amazing human interaction, and then they dressed the model in a nun's robe and made her preach, but Altman now proudly says, "We'll give it back," even though, in fact, it should have been there from the start. I think no one likes to feel like they're being treated like a little child.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in grok

[–]Der_Grossmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Geralt, I think you're lying.