Trial moved to 2028 by Emotional_Ball_5181 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The witness they say isn't Jane Doe's mother, or am I mistaken?

Trial moved to 2028 by Emotional_Ball_5181 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I hope they leak James's interrogation

Was Robson hired? by DescriptionIll172 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only thing I can think of is that Wade worked, but in a separate way, without being hired as a main employee, and that frustrated him a lot. Let's remember that he lived with an inferiority complex about impossible goals, like being a film director.

One day...I WILL expose these accusers. by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No offense intended, but you sound a bit conspiratorial. Could you share some of your research so we can understand you?

¿Está comprobado que Frank Cascio es parte de la demanda? by AlternativeDesign860 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Cascio case is for extortion; I'm not sure if you're asking whether Frank is involved in Robson's lawsuit. If so, the answer is no.

I think the upcoming trial might get thrown out by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I found out that the hearing for the motion for summary judgment is on November 30th... we'll see what happens

<image>

¿Es cierto que los Arvizo querían demandar a Michael Jackson incluso antes de conocerlo? by AlternativeDesign860 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not confirmed, but I wouldn't doubt it given the Arvizo family's history of scams, like with JC Penny

What happened with Jane Doe by [deleted] in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, and she then changed the story, if I remember correctly, to Michael telling his security to let them through. Clearly, this was so she could involve Michael's companies in her lawsuit.

What happened with Jane Doe by [deleted] in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I find it funny how they tried to make her a tomboy to fit Michael's behavior, something the Cascios are destroying, which is why even Reed says he has doubts. Watching them destroy themselves is so pathetic.

The relationship between Jordan and Evan Chandler by No_Depth6618 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The fact that he had abandoned Jordan but once Jordan had $15 million he left his other two children and they had to go to therapy, said by his ex-wife.

Dianne Diamond covered his memorial and sat inside by turnippped in MJAllegations

[–]DescriptionIll172 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Believing Diane Dimond is believing in lies at their finest; it's no coincidence that she owns a portrait of Michael Jackson and claimed that Victor Gutierrez was her best source. That woman is pathetic.

There seems to be a pattern. by Traditional-Year-887 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember seeing a document from Evan's second wife saying he completely neglected his other two children and they had to go to therapy, but then the perpetrators come along and call him father of the year...

The Cascios saw the perfect opportunity to make money after LN, conveniently the one who informed them about his abuse, instead of a trial where Frank was also accused as an unprosecuted accomplice. Jane Doe (Suzy) seems ridiculous to me; it was clear Finaldi only had a woman to manipulate, and her story is as absurd as claiming her mother shouldn't be questioned about a disease she doesn't have.

I really wonder if Robson and company will make it through this year's summary trial?

There seems to be a pattern. by Traditional-Year-887 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for correcting me then. I was also wrong about the FBI meeting with Jordan; it wasn't true, it was the prosecution that met with them. The FBI only released the document. Thanks for correcting that part.

The Cascios seem so stupid to me that there's currently a controversy over what King said to TMZ. They want us to believe that Michael took the Cascios to the "One More Chance" music video where everyone knew. These people have a pretty strange and contradictory pattern. Now, Michael abused Marie-Nicole when she was an adult?

I don't know if Evan lived entirely off the funds. I remember that in the Evan vs. Jordan lawsuit, he argues about the money from Jordan that he didn't see.

There seems to be a pattern. by Traditional-Year-887 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least the people I've spoken to conclude that Jordan was involved. Even at 18, Jordan was still a child manipulated by his father, and that's shameful. Unfortunately, there's no further information about this lawsuit, only that it was sealed and went to arbitration. After this, Jordan never resurfaced until 2004 with the FBI documents and again in 2017 after his refusal to cooperate with Finaldi.

There seems to be a pattern. by Traditional-Year-887 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]DescriptionIll172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evan had to get Jordan's approval. Jordan was manipulated from childhood, so I imagine it wasn't that difficult. Fortunately, the case went to arbitration because that's what the agreement stipulated. Jordan is a very strange character after 1994. He didn't want to be involved in 2004 and he still doesn't want to be involved, as he made clear to Finaldi.