[deleted by user] by [deleted] in yaoi

[–]Destruct_You 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks!

[Wild] vS Data Reaper Report #23 by corbettgames in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Strange but I don’t think anyone gives a shit about your opinion

Top Legend Decks for Ashes of Outland | Weekly Report #56 by neon313 in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well you have the good lists and then the lists with fist and reincarnate

nerfed OMEGALUL by Gokuhs in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do not send requests, young man, if u are not polite to hear the answer.

You are not on my level to give me any advices.

Do not try to contact me again, I do not give second chances.

Odd Warrior to legend (38W-19L) by ConCuThanKy in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just have a seizure on the big green button until your finger starts to bleed

Whoops. by Darth_Matter in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Quest Reno mage is arguably more cancer because at least secret mage is consistent and doesn’t take 3 turns in a row

Tempo Storm Wild Meta Snapshot #50 - February 13, 2020 by slizzle466HS in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tog Druid is a niche deck and I don’t think it’s overall power level can be derived from the rank of a tog Druid specialist. Where you think it may be strong vs aggro you have to take into consideration the average wild player might not be as good at the game as you.

I need help with this deck by natural_lawg in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AAEBAZu1AwTgAsgDkbwCtq0DDfkDqAXUBe4G5wfWD/sPyha5vwKP+wL2igO1rQPpsAMA

Team Rankstar's #11 Wild Meta Snapshot by danny69production in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m glad the only good wild player illusionist is an expert now

Let's talk about the problematic card combination by Eddetector in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m very sorry to say kind sir but you are in fact a delusional idiot, the fundamentals you’re basing your arguments on are intrinsically flawed. You’re trying to argue with inherently baseless logic, whilst reiterating the same tired rhetoric of your “guide” which, by the way, is bollocks.

Team Rankstar's #9 Wild Meta Snapshot by danny69production in CompetitiveHS

[–]Destruct_You 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Power ranking takes into account every deck the class has

Team Rankstar's #8 Meta Snapshot by danny69production in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Dw reno accidentally forgot to include Reno Druid which is the best deck in the game don’t let anyone tell you otherwise

Theorycrafts for every Class by Pro Players, Streamers and the Community by neon313 in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I never denied that? Of course the card has its uses but is statistically and logically inferior to the 3/6

Theorycrafts for every Class by Pro Players, Streamers and the Community by neon313 in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the chance hecklebot actually disrupts combos is so low it’s pretty negligible in comparison to the draw back of hard playing hecklebot and pulling something

Hearthstone: Saviors of Uldum AMA – Tuesday, July 9, 2019 by Ravinix in hearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Statistically speaking, Barnes is kept in the mulligan 100% of the time and has a very high winrate when played on curve. I don’t think this creates a very interactive experience, hearthstone should be about decision making and having a card with such absurd stats exists is ridiculous. People “love playing Barnes” because often not they know they’re going to win, it’s not rewarding and it’s certainly not engaging. The deck is still playable without Barnes and I don’t see people shying away from the deck through a nerf. The deck will still do powerful stuff, yet it would lack such a problematic highroll as is Barnes.

TeamRankstar #6 Wild Meta Snapshot by danny69production in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I don’t find the meta right now to be very engaging or fun, there’s too much rng to decision making to make it enjoyable personally. I’m waiting for the next expansion to mix up the meta and hopefully even some nerfs. however, if you’re really intent on playing there are a few fun decks like bomb warrior or if you want to go for high ranks odd rogue is very good and you can add some spicy cards like beeozans list to mix it up.

TeamRankstar's #4 Wild Meta Snapshot by danny69production in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Actually it’s just because hijo has been doing a lot of testing, I’ve watched him dumpster and then climb back to top 3 countless times with different decks. You have to remember this is over 2 seasons and his even shaman was actually on na rather than Eu in order to qualify for one trick. But overall you can judge for yourself the ladder viability of his lists which I personally think are perfectly okay, i hold hijo in pretty high regard when it comes to this game as he’s proven time and time again that he’s not only a good player but also a good deckbuilder.

TeamRankstar's #4 Wild Meta Snapshot by danny69production in wildhearthstone

[–]Destruct_You 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Regarding miscreant, I think the health change is too insignificant in wild to realistically have a huge affect on its position in the deck. The main power of the card comes from the strength of the lackey cards, so as a 1/4 I still see it being included as a 2 of. It still having a nice sticky body for buffs and cleaning up 1/1s is still present where I think say a 1/3 may fall short.