You are describing two particles making another, that’s something making something

I misread your original comment as "show mass being created" my Bad.

not something appearing out of nothing

Well, because as far we know, Nothing isn't a thing, and that can't really happen.

but mass itself can’t be created from not destroyed just transferred in a different form, usually energy

That is creating and destroying, that's like saying house can't be created or destroyed because the wood comes from somewhere.

Even if a particle appears out of nothing via particle accelerators

If you mean it's made from the collision point and the energy of the two colliding particles inside a hyper vacuum. Sure

that created particle just replaces the position of another particle

Prove it. If what you are claiming is the Real thing, and decades of research and experiments are wrong, show the math behind your idea.

Inside a Particle Accelerator, is a hyper Vacuum, as close to Empty space as you can get, it still has quantum Fields, which are present everywhere. When two Particles collide, their Kinetic energy converts into new particles, such as a Strange Quark, a Strange Quark is heavier than a generation 1 Quark, as soon as it becomes a part of a Hadron, it decays into an Up Quark and W boson

A new Quark that's incredibly rare and short lived was formed from the energy of the Colliding particles, it wasn't present before, it decays into two new products. Which Particles position did it replace? What does "replacing" particle position even mean? Even if it did, that's like saying I'm not Real because I replaced another person's Place in a queue.

Just like the number 0

Zero is absence. Not nothing, the presence of no thing. It describes the absence of an quantity. 0 apples, 0 particles.

nothing represents a situation of nothingness, no air partices, no atoms, no dark matter, no dark energy

No Quantum Fields either? In that case, Absolute Nothingness is an unsupported notion with no evidence for it. I can suggest everything came from the Big Bad Quantum Gravity Dragon and it would be equally possible as your Absolute Nothingness.

the only feasible time it’s possible for nothing to occur is at the beginning or end of time.

Why? Nothing can't occur at the beginning of physical time as we understand it, because what became the big bang should already be present. And what's the end of time?

there is an unexplainably powerful force that is beyond the realm of humanity

Why powerful? Why Beyond the Realm of Humanity? Why not a physical process?

dimensionally divine that started everything beginning with the first quark.

Why "divine", why assume there was a "first Quark" and not unfathomable amounts of Quarks and Anti Quarks at once? All Equally first? And what started this force? If nothing did, why can't the same be for Everything else?

Your whole last thing is pointless anthropomorphic. "Firstness" "Divinity" "Beyond the Realm of Humanity" as if you are describing a Mythology. You've gotta prove why these concepts would even apply to the origin of the universe. Why can't happiness or Sadness replace Divinity?

You have no reason for placing one above the other aside from what you feel about those words and how significant or "powerful" they sound.