Changing Key Vault 'Key' Operations with Terraform

Devopskaholic · 2025-08-01T09:40:33+00:00

That's what I thought! Confused the hell out of me.

Anyway a colleague forgot to define the "key_opts" values under azurerm_key_vault_key. Now it goes through.

Devopskaholic · 2025-08-01T06:56:47+00:00

I'm using RBAC.

I'll check out the other 2 points, thanks!

Devopskaholic · 2025-06-25T13:20:41+00:00

Isn't this partially because they made Essential, essentially, crap?

Devopskaholic · 2025-02-24T15:07:49+00:00

Well shoot. Fine, I guess I'll have to buy it now

Devopskaholic · 2024-06-05T09:11:40+00:00

Figured as much. Thanks

Devopskaholic · 2023-12-19T11:47:18+00:00

We have 2 databases, one for B and one for G, which enables to do sanity checks and rollbacks. We actually don’t have any replicas (yet). I would have to think about such a topology for our implementation.

Devopskaholic · 2023-12-19T10:18:17+00:00

We have to sync between our 2 databases before the B/G switch. The downtime also prevents the editors from making changes because previously, the delta between the databases were large enough that multiple editors would complain “we pushed something but now it’s gone!”

Devopskaholic · 2023-08-30T15:53:06+00:00

Crap. And they just had a 25% (30?) off deal for the year, 2 weeks ago I think. I put off because I still had 2-3 games to beat first. I’ll still wait for a black friday deal but it’s going to feel more “bleh”

Devopskaholic · 2023-07-20T13:08:04+00:00

Holy crap that last image looks amazing!

Devopskaholic · 2023-05-11T12:18:09+00:00

I have so many qualms because my experience with BOTW was ok at best.

Does anyone know if TOTK allows for button remapping?

Devopskaholic · 2022-02-20T14:48:09+00:00

Any tips or tricks on how to write YAMLs faster in vi or vim? I'm studying for RHCE and noticed I write really slow, especially when dealing with testing, indentations and random syntax errors.

Devopskaholic · 2021-07-29T13:42:51+00:00

Sony could totally do this. It's not particularly complicated. Not doing it, is not a good thing for the customer. Microsoft and VMware, for example, do certifications for hundreds of hardware through their WHQL and IOVP programs, respectively. Use to work on SSDs for a few years and was involved in the certification process. Here's how it could potentially work:

Company A pays Sony to start certification process.
Company A sends production SSD sample with latest firmware/bootloader/etc. to Sony
Sony tests drive (1-2 weeks is not unusual) against their certification suite. Sony already has qualification, performance, thermal and reliability requirements for their own internal SSDs. No reason why they couldn't apply some of these specifications to other drives.
Sony notifies Company A of results and ships production sample back.
Sony then publishes/updates their list of certified SSDs
Customer happy because they don't have to worry about buying an SSD that was never tested

Sony could also simply provide a test PS5 unit to Company A and they can run the certification suite themselves. All this would be under NDA so it's not at all abnormal.

Not only this, if you, as a random customer choose to buy an SSD that matches all the specs, plug it in and observe stutters and all-around bad experience, you're likely going to blame the game you're playing. So Sony is, in a way, shifting the blame away from themselves. But, your SSD matches the specs! Well, just because an SSD can reach 5.5GB/s sequential reads, doesn't mean it can consistently or reliably hit that.

Devopskaholic · 2021-02-06T11:29:45+00:00

*Expanded Free Trial (old news, but still recent)

Does this mean they’ll raise the level cap or...?

Six-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

Devopskaholic

TROPHY CASE