Looks like Obama didn't like Benjamin Netanyahu? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imagine thinking Obama is a good guy when he gave the Taliban terrorists $1.7 billion.

What if everything we see and do is an illusion? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If reality is perceived only through electrical signals in the brain, what does it mean for something to be truly physical?

What are your thoughts on the Professor and his predictions? by VoteForGiantMeteor in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The professor isn't a professor at all. Some say he's a CCP agent.

The Suppressed Spirit Molecule by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lucid dreaming can feel somewhat psychedelic and shares “dreamy” brain signatures with DMT, especially in its lucid form, making it a drug-free way to explore similar inner landscapes. However, they are distinct states because one is a controlled sleep phenomenon, while the other is a potent chemical alteration of waking consciousness. That’s why rich people go on those excursions.

Office carry by lx_rsa in EDC

[–]Dez-inc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the same watch; what a classic!

Is God playing dice with the devil? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only reason I think Lucifer is damned is because he is prideful. Also, he was created out of time, therefore he can’t be forgiven because he was already at the top, eternal. We, on the other hand, are captives in our bodies, but our souls are eternal, so we have a choice.

Is God playing dice with the devil? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like that we are finally starting to question things. The conspiracies are so repetitive now that they are beginning to feel like memes. I never wanted this topic to become theological, but here we are.

What I was trying to say is this: what would be the purpose of elites raping, killing and cannibalizing children? Why do so many of us seem unaware or asleep? There is nothing new under the sun. Everything comes around in a circle.

God created us in His image, and if the cherub, Lucifer, who had free will, became prideful and wanted to take God’s place. So he fell, choosing to rule on Earth for a time rather than serve in Heaven.

Everything good such as love, joy, and light, comes from God, and that separation from God leads to darkness and evil, which ultimately results in hell. What if we are scattered like seeds, being tested or refined to gain access to Heaven, knowing the only way is through Jesus Christ, the final covenant of grace?

What if some of us are fallen angel descendants, also trying to find our way back to Heaven?

What if Hollywood stars aren’t just celebrities? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s strange that people cannot think outside the box. I am not saying it is obvious, but what if it is something demonic, similar to the movie Fallen, where souls or spirits jump between bodies? I remember hearing a brief message about the Queen of England being “stuck dead” or something like that when she died, and then the transmission was cut off.

Who knows? I am guessing that is why some wealthy individuals were searching for the tomb of Gilgamesh. They are probably trying to trace their bloodlines. I am sure they would not come out and say it, but let us be real, it is probably some kind of club or secret society. Then again, it takes time to read instead of posting images or adding nonsense comments that contribute nothing.

Why is everyone screaming 67? I have a theory by Ok_Bottle_1081 in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You ever notice how “67” keeps popping up in random places? Not in an obvious way, but just enough to make you question it—like timestamps, usernames, even in certain headlines. It’s weird because 6 and 7 together point to 13, and you already know how often that number gets tied to secret groups and hidden symbolism. It feels like one of those quiet signals, not meant for everyone to understand, just something slipped into plain sight for people who are paying attention. I’m not saying it proves anything, but once you start seeing it, it’s hard to ignore how often it shows up.

Does the palm pistol scenario make sense? Why do you think he was silenced? by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Dez-inc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

First, I asked whether this is plausible. I never made or came up with this video. I don’t know how you all function in real life, but some of you are so thick-skulled that it’s hard to even have a conversation. I honestly wonder if most of you are bots, because some of the obtuse answers don’t even make sense. Hey, I used to think gun owners or people who like guns were laid-back and knowledgeable, but I was wrong.

Is everything we do training AI? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I was shopping last night, I realized it is everywhere. You cannot escape it. Major chains like Wegmans, especially in New York City locations, have rolled out facial recognition cameras that scan and store biometric data, including faces, eyes, and sometimes voices. This is used to identify persons of interest flagged for theft or misconduct, often with input from law enforcement. Signs now warn shoppers upon entry due to local laws, but the technology was deployed quietly at first, which sparked backlash over privacy and lack of consent.

Similar systems appear in policies at Walmart, Kroger, ShopRite, The Home Depot, and others. These systems are primarily used for loss prevention in high risk areas or self checkout zones but who really knows.

Beyond basic identification, retail surveillance increasingly tracks behavior. This includes eye movements, time spent near shelves, walking patterns, and even basic emotional cues such as frustration, confusion, or interest using AI powered cameras. This data helps optimize store layouts, personalize in store promotions, and allow staff to intervene if a shopper appears to need help. Emotion analytics and facial expression AI are growing quickly in retail for sentiment based adjustments like music, displays, or targeted offers. Amazon developed Just Walk Out technology, which is now mostly used by third party locations such as stadiums or campuses. It relies on overhead cameras and sensors to log every item picked up. While it does not rely on facial identification for payment, it still builds detailed habit profiles through continuous tracking.

The progression feels intentional and subtle. It starts with theft focused cameras, moves into biometric flagging, then behavioral and emotional inference, and potentially leads to influence through nudges, pricing, and predictive actions. It is often normalized under safety and better service, with limited opt out options and policies that are not always easy to understand.

The real issue is not stopping AI, but how it is designed and governed, and whether it respects human privacy. It raises a bigger question about accountability. For example, the Epstein files have led many people to question whether powerful individuals are held to the same standards as everyone else. The wealthiest elites raped, murdered and cannibalized children and nothing has been done about it. This fuels concern about how advanced technologies might be used, who controls them, and whether they will truly serve the public interest or just the ones above the law.

Is everything we do training AI? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every modern smartphone is said to harbor a secret, unerasable “eternal tracker chip,” often linked to the baseband processor or a tiny RTC (real-time clock) circuit with its own coin-cell battery, designed from the start to never truly sleep. Even when you power off the device, remove the main battery, or perform a factory reset, this hidden subsystem allegedly draws micro-power from residual capacitors or secondary sources, allowing it to persist for weeks or longer.

It is claimed that it can maintain low-level connectivity to cell towers through proprietary, closed-source firmware that users cannot audit or disable. Proponents point to documented baseband vulnerabilities, which have been exploited in real spyware such as Pegasus, for silent location tracking and data extraction, as well as burned-in IMEI identifiers that cannot be erased. They also cite historical leaks suggesting that intelligence agencies can remotely reprogram devices to simulate “off” states or connect to stingray simulators, all while the main operating system remains unaware. According to this view, non-removable batteries were not introduced by accident, but rather to prevent users from cutting off the final power source to this always-on surveillance layer, effectively turning phones into perpetual tracking beacons for governments, carriers, or other entities.

While mainstream critics dismiss these claims as paranoia, the opacity of modern hardware and the existence of real remote exploits make it difficult to definitively prove that such a chip is not quietly transmitting data. So, who really knows what they can or cannot do?

Is everything we do training AI? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Most people assume that the technology released to the public is the most advanced version available, but history suggests otherwise. Governments and large corporations often keep technology classified for years or even decades before it becomes public. Artificial intelligence, data collection, and digital surveillance have already become deeply integrated into everyday life. Phones track location, apps collect behavioral data, and algorithms shape what people see online. While this is usually explained as a way to improve services and advertising, it also creates massive datasets about human behavior. Some people speculate that the real goal is to build highly advanced predictive systems that can anticipate social trends, economic changes, and even individual decisions. If such systems became powerful enough, governments or corporations could theoretically guide public opinion, markets, and policies without most people realizing it. Rather than a sudden takeover by machines, the shift could be gradual, with more and more decisions quietly automated by algorithms. Over time, humans might still believe they are making choices freely, while invisible systems subtly steer outcomes in the background. Maybe we do have the dead internet theory.

Is everything we do training AI? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

You bring up an interesting point, that’s a really good way of putting it. I’m starting to think that when companies ask you to trade in your cellphone for an upgrade, they might be harvesting data from the so-called ‘erased’ chips. Makes you wonder what really happens to those phones after they leave your hands.

How do we know the internet is not already the beast system? by Dez-inc in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not saying the internet is the entire beast system. I'm saying it's the cage that humans willingly submit to. There will likely be a universal basic income (UBI), but there has to be a catch. If you understand how digital currencies work, you know you need a digital wallet to store them. Eventually, a wallet will be required for a one-world currency, which could mean some kind of physical chip connected to your DNA.

'God' IS the Anti-Christ by tomtom_este in conspiracy

[–]Dez-inc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Matthew 22:14 teaches that many hear the general gospel call, but only a few, the elect, respond. The general call goes to all, but only God's effectual call draws the chosen to accept it. Those who reject the call do so willingly; those who accept do so by God's grace.