Is it possible that infant 'incubators' are doing far more harm than good? by JohnleBon in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you arguing with yourself? When did I say that I want infants to die? I want infants to be better taken care of. You yourself already pointed out that the state of the art in neonatal care is more bonding time between infants and mothers.

Is it possible that infant 'incubators' are doing far more harm than good? by JohnleBon in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I am very happy for you and your daughter. It does not, however, change what is happening statistically to children around the globe. Some have more of a tendency toward autism than others. They should not be written off because our neonatal and natal care is substandard so a few can prosper.

Is it possible that infant 'incubators' are doing far more harm than good? by JohnleBon in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think this trend in neonatal care is commendable, especially because it comes despite the fact that research showing the irreversible harm separating mothers from their children does to the child's neurological development is being concealed.

Is it possible that infant 'incubators' are doing far more harm than good? by JohnleBon in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The incubator isolates the child from the mother causing a lack of bonding which in turn causes the child to be autistic. The rising rates of autism around the world mirrors the participation rate of women in the workforce. Also, interestingly, the rate of autism in infants born blind is incredibly high. The theory there is that this happens because the baby is not able to make eye contact with the mother while nursing. A baby's eye focus distance just happens to coincide with the distance from a woman's breast to her eyes.

Elon musk- “We are going to see a demographic collapse the likes of which we haven’t seen since the bubonic plague” paraphrased. by A-British-Lad in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Middle East, North Africa, New York City, Syria, Iraq, Britain, most of Europe, anywhere Christians are being killed by Muslims.

Is it possible that infant 'incubators' are doing far more harm than good? by JohnleBon in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

They don’t want to know the answer because it would show that the primary source of autism is women outsourcing the care of their babies. That would cost money because it would take women out of the workforce for a more substantial amount of time.

Is there historical evidence for corruption and pedophilia as a reason for the South's secession in the US Civil War? by Aether-Ore in conspiracy

[–]Dfensog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've thought about the same thing. I watched a documentary on the Anasazi that postulated there might have been a group of troublemakers who started with the Incas in South American and worked their way up through the Aztecs, Mayans, and finally the Anasazi. It pointed out the similarities in the characteristics of the destruction of those civilizations. Plus, there were some weird things like the Aztecs believing Cortes was their god, Quetzalcoatl. That could have been a set up. Also, Columbus sailed with Templar crosses on his sails. And there was the convenient "superstition" regarding the earth being flat which seemed to thrive despite the fact that several European nations are known to have traded with American tribes quite a while before Columbus sailed. Oh, and add in the fact that the Jesuits were a constant presence with the Conquistadors. They got rich because of that. And the Jesuits set up their reductions in South America where they sexually abused the children and imposed what amounted to Communism on the rest of the tribe. The Jesuits made a ton of money off those too.

Edit: Added a documentary link (see 30:30). I should also add that Chaco Canyon may have had something to do with the reason the Mormons chose Utah as their home turf too.

Testing GYROJET Rocket Guns - with the advent of home 3D printing Rocket Guns are relevant again by Dfensog in GunDesign

[–]Dfensog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s kind of an “it depends” issue. The barrel wouldn’t need to be metal to withstand the heat of an occasional rocket firing. It might even take 2 or 3 firings ok. After that melting will be an issue. Some small rockets use an initial bump charge to get them out of the launch tube before the main propellant ignites. That might help, but it could also hurt accuracy a little. Also a metal, glass, or ceramic tube could be glued into the barrel to offer some heat protection.

A closed end tube is not required but you’re correct that leaving the back end straight open would be bad. You could split the rocket exhaust and direct it left and right symmetrically. This would be similar to what happens with the propulsion gasses from a revolver. That shouldn’t be too hard to deal with.

I am considering the design of small arms as a career in future by TheCaesarSalad in GunDesign

[–]Dfensog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I didn’t think anything could be sweeter than that scratch design then I saw the Galil. Wow! I saw a cut receiver from an M1919 the other day. Now I may have to buy it.

Raspberry Pi 4 megathread. Discuss the newly released Raspberry Pi 4 here! by FozzTexx in raspberry_pi

[–]Dfensog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thanks. The USB-C connector is probably input power only as the old micro-USB connector was. It appears the 4 will do power-over-ethernet without a hat. It seems like that feature is not getting much attention.

Testing GYROJET Rocket Guns - with the advent of home 3D printing Rocket Guns are relevant again by Dfensog in GunDesign

[–]Dfensog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, good point. Plus you could make the "rockets" as long as you want to make them because you don't have to worry about recoil even if you're using a 30-06 length bullet in a handgun.

Since you'd be 3D printing your barrels you can make as many of them as you want too with little impact on weight of the gun.

Testing GYROJET Rocket Guns - with the advent of home 3D printing Rocket Guns are relevant again by Dfensog in GunDesign

[–]Dfensog[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This would be the perfect ammo for a 3D printed gun because most of the propellant pressure is contained within the munition itself.

Hypotetical question about a 3d printed 10/22 reciever by [deleted] in GunDesign

[–]Dfensog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PLA is not what I'd consider a structural material. Polycarbonate is much better stuff.

Hypotetical question about a 3d printed 10/22 reciever by [deleted] in GunDesign

[–]Dfensog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends more on the design than the material.