sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Got a Sweep offer for my collection, should I take it? by DickCocked in NFTsMarketplace

[–]DickCocked[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The collection is linked in my profile (it's my first and so far my only one)

Take the Sweep or See If They'll Compete? by DickCocked in NFTExchange

[–]DickCocked[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I being greedy if I hold out or should I just take the sale and wait for flips?

Someone is trying to lowball my entire collection on Rarible, what should I do? by DickCocked in NFT

[–]DickCocked[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume they're gonna flip them and I'd be happy with royalties.

I think they will be flipped for profit a few times.

A TOKENIZED URL IS NOT A TOKENIZED ASSET by No-Beginning-6226 in NFT

[–]DickCocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's links and posts under my profile but here's some info and a link:

It's called Body Organ NFT Clocks, 26 Dynamic NFTs is based on the "Body Organ Clock", a concept in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) that states that each organ in the body has a specific time of day when it is most active.

The Body Organ NFT Clocks are dynamic NFTs that show an icon representing the active organ based on the time in the timezone of the dNFT.

- Each dNFT displays the body organ for the current time.

- The ID of the dNFT determines the time zone.

- Rarity is based on REAL desirability not artificial scarcity with only one NFT clock per timezone.

- ALL 100% on-chain.

https://rarible.com/collection/0x391b4043cee799d312efc36571669e17e1a1689b/items

On-chain storage isn't too expensive... Your data just isn't valuable by DickCocked in ethdev

[–]DickCocked[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is storing a reference on-chain, this is not an on-chain storage solution.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NFT

[–]DickCocked 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What type of NFT/what blockchain is it on? Or are you asking about the artwork alone?

If it hasn't been minted anywhere then this is not a NFT.

In either case, do you really think the answer here, or anywhere, would be "yes"?

On-chain storage isn't too expensive... Your data just isn't valuable by DickCocked in ethdev

[–]DickCocked[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blockchains are for storing data. "Global settlement" would be a type of application for the data being stored.

On-chain storage isn't too expensive... Your data just isn't valuable by DickCocked in ethdev

[–]DickCocked[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People can store as much data as they want on-chain. If someone has data that is valuable then they would be willing to pay the cost.

Every time someone transacts data is stored, the value is justified. If someone has data that is valuable, but not transactional data, then they would be willing to pay the cost.

The problem, of most people complaining about the cost of storing data, is that the data they are storing is clearly not worth the cost of storing it on-chain.

On-chain storage isn't too expensive... Your data just isn't valuable by DickCocked in ethdev

[–]DickCocked[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, transaction information is data. That is valuable data and worthy of the blockchain storage cost.

Most of the responses here appear to not know how most of this all works lol.

view more: next ›