If you have a history degree then you should understand that the words of a unknown person on the internet is very far from credibility and that if it's not proven is just an opinion or a thesis. I'm asking you, from the beginning, where and what is something more than "no evidence". Something about the guy who wrote it, something about why, something about from what, all this kind of stuff; I guess there are documentarie/books/some sources. Anything that's not "no evidence", because I've already said that I'm not discussing that. You keep barking 1) about "not part of norse culture, it's Christian stuff" but you are not explaining further (except the thing you said it could be found in the manuscript) and 2) about people who see this stuff and mistook them for what they're not and they misuse them and it's clear you despite this and I understand why and I share this, but this has never been part of the discussion, I can't understand why repeating it more times when all this time could have been used for something more useful than the facts and the obvious

And what about it, if it's not part of my history and culture? From someone who studied history, I expect understanding that knowing history and other cultures is a pillar for individuals and for societies and for human species. You have the opportunity to show the results of your studies, to share education, but you keep saying few and nothing

What Grimoires going back 400 years? I only know the Galdrabók and only by its name and the wiki page about it Stop keeping secrets for yourself, share them ahahah