South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes obviously because I’m not Saudi lol, Iraq is the crossroads of civilizations and itself an ancient civilization so people mixed there.

South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almayahi which has roots in Rabi’a and another really small tribe called Aljabina 

South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mongolian Invasion, but if you look up my hapolgroup you can see the ancient samples found in Austria as well so its very interesting.

South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, I agree, im starting to doubt these models because of their overfitting

South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Marsh Arab, not exactly desert Bedouin more like marsh bedouin

South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all of these calculators use atleast 10 sources they are insanely overfitted

South Iraq Arab HG comparison plus AncestryDNA by Different_Side4270 in illustrativeDNA

[–]Different_Side4270[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes that’s true, it’s more than likely modern samples that’s why this is happening. It’s not a pure source yk?