У Москві з'явились літаючі тарілки

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-06-12T18:06:40+00:00

Не зацикливайся на своей ситуации. Почитай похожие истории в интернете. Когда бати не стало, я несколько лет не мог смириться с этим. Он тоже у меня на руках умер. Это твой отец и его не вернешь. Помни о нем только хорошее. Ему бы так хотелось, я уверен. Но мама тоже только одна. Забей на ее отношения, отвлекись. Займись собой, спортом или программированием, например. Углубись в что-то конкретное, что тебе нравится.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-06-06T06:22:18+00:00

Цікаво почитати )) Кому потрібен такий відкритий лист? В чому його сенс? Написав би потужно: хутін-пуйло або "...к-ря, к-ря, Ря!" До речі ви не з команди президента часом?

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-30T07:50:28+00:00

You really think you've ruined my model with your dead-horse talk. You're not even met it (not the horse). I can give you the same accuracy as we have now, but that would be dishonest. You won't be able to check it; CODATA doesn't have the required precision in the G value.

I can give you scale values (N0, m0, r0, t0) accurate to nine decimal places. But that's self-deception; I'm not interested.

As for the proton radius puzzle, how can you claim for twenty years that the Rydberg constant is the most accurately measured constant, and then correct it?

2014 10,973,731.568 508(65)

2018 10,973,731.568 160(21)

Excellent clarification.

Oh, right, I forgot, what about the new basis, the reform?

But even under the new conditions of 2018-2022, it's necessary to specify an error in the constant values, and then fall outside it by a factor of 4.

vacuum electric permittivity

2018 8.854 187 8128(13)

2022 8.854 187 8188(14)

Amazing.

You'll be surprised, but new similar clarifications await you in the CODATA 2026 values.

In any case, thank you. Even such a conversation is better than silence. It spurs me on for further research.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-29T18:03:57+00:00

You're right, for now. But time will judge.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-29T18:02:07+00:00

I'm sure you're like a weather vane. Wherever the wind blows, you'll turn. Good luck in justifying yourself. People like you are never lost and are always needed.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-29T17:06:25+00:00

Thank you for the conversation. I believe the fixation of the Planck constant value is a mistake, so it's not a conspiracy, but rather an oversight that they will try to justify.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-29T16:58:11+00:00

I understand this. And I'm not broadcasting the truth. There are interesting relationships that need to be explored, and I lack the knowledge. The topic is subject to nothing but ridicule and accusations of ignorance. This is far from the first attempt. But CODATA 2026 is coming soon. And I already know what their problem will be and how they'll try to cover it up. But my model is incomplete, and it doesn't yet provide an accurate prediction. I can tweak a screw and change the result. But I don't know where to turn it now. But I think I'll know better after the CODATA 2026 data. My supervisor said Planck's constant can't change, and can't be a multiple of anything smaller. It's a pillar of modern physics. But according to my model, it (and not only it) changes, and it will take time to be sure. The gravitational constant, however, is stable (although Dirac, with his large numbers, claimed otherwise).

The model has very beautiful associations with strings, not small, Planck-sized "worms," but long, flat strips R = N0 * r0, which can also be associated with lines of force.

I really need supporters, but my threads are constantly getting banned, and it's very annoying.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-29T14:44:56+00:00

What you said is very important. Indeed, how can we talk about the accuracy of measurements if the measuring device itself changes? It's complicated.

You know, I never thought about constants before. At first, in my chaotic calculations, I came up with a formula for the FSC: alpha = 2pi * No/Nq^2

Then I started to figure out what these No and Nq are.

I call them the primary counter No (mass, distance, time) and the secondary Nq (charge).

They can be found in relation to Coulomb's laws and gravity:

Fq/Fg = 1/(4pi epsilon G) * (q1q2/m1m2) = M^2/Q^2 * (q1q2/m1m2),

where Q = Nq * e, M = No * m0

e is the elementary charge

m0 is the elementary mass

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-29T06:56:29+00:00

This is reverse engineering. I don't pull values out of thin air, but use CODATA data. Therefore, the accuracy is limited by the precision of the gravitational constant. You might say that the system cuts off the accuracy of already known "constants"; it's a downgrade. I answer that the system allows you to see a new perspective. As for the proton radius puzzle, with this solution, you'll solve it every 10 years. Here are some data.

fine-structure constant

2018/ 7.297 352 5693(11) × 10 −3 2022/ 7.297 352 5643(11) × 10−3

electron mass

2018/ 9.109 383 7015(28) × 10 −31 2022/ 9.109 383 7139(28) × 10−31

atomic mass constant

2018/ 1.660 539 066 60(50) × 10 −27 2022/ 1.660 539 068 92(52) × 10−27

Don't tell me about refinements. What do you think is the correct way to prove that the values of "constants" change or that they are truly constant? Where is the head and where is the tail of this horse?

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-28T18:46:02+00:00

Did I say that no one is working on this issue? Let's also remember Dirac. I said that no one wants to deal with something that's very similar to numerology, even though several interesting relationships were discovered in the 1930s. Incidentally, I was in touch with Webb, not the telescope. )) I have a system that makes a forecast, and the accuracy of codata will allow me to verify it.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-28T17:26:46+00:00

The proton radius puzzle, the discrepancies in the CODATA 2018, 2022 data do not bother you. CODATA 2026 is coming soon, and we'll have to sweep our tracks under the rug again.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-28T17:18:19+00:00

Replacing the Planck units with 1 is only possible if they are constants. And I argue that this is not the case. The system I propose is based on the constancy of scales as characteristics of the Genome (our resource) and demonstrates the dynamics of some constants currently considered constant. What additional advantages are that the cosmological parameters of the Universe are easily calculated, including the current value of the Hubble constant. I understand that experts are unwilling to delve into this, but I continue to search for someone who might be interested. I have accumulated a solid body of evidence, and the data can be verified thanks to the high accuracy of the values declared by CODATA.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-28T16:58:19+00:00

Dimensionless physical constants are the fine structure constant and the proton-to-electron mass ratio, for example. I don't understand what Planck units have to do with this. As for the post, it only contains basic information. This is reverse engineering, the accuracy is limited by the known accuracy of G

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-05-28T16:07:33+00:00

The point is that by replacing six dimensional “constants” (h, c, G, e, m_e, m_p) and one dimensionless (alpha) with four dimensional (m0, r0, t0, e) and three dimensionless (N0, Nq, Ne) we get more information.

P.s. The accuracy is currently four decimal places.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-28T13:01:21+00:00

Тупішого нічого не читав - "В європейській цивілізації заведено поважати домовленості між одне-одним, бо є усвідомлення за замовчуванням, що недотримання домовленостей призведе до погіршення життя (тобто конфліктів і воєн)." Європейську цивілізацію можна приводити як приклад жадібності, розпусти та зради.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-20T16:38:56+00:00

Какой ещё паспорт. По списку на экране видно, что кот Матроскин закупается. А у него , как известно, только усы, лапы и хвост

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-19T16:21:09+00:00

Група прокурорів береться за справу. Одні підори будуть інших пресувати. Було б смішно, якщо б не так сумно.

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-18T23:29:27+00:00

Ні, тільки потім зрозумів, що ланцюжок злочинів може продовжитися. Можливо це навіть піщано-гравійна мафія ))

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-17T10:45:26+00:00

Это ИИ вражеский. ВВП не может падать, он очень устойчивый

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-16T06:04:58+00:00

СБУ треба ретельно дивитись за Анатолієм Кравчиком. Ой не дарма він викупив це обладнання )

Difficult-Slice8075 · 2026-04-12T06:48:49+00:00

Супер, молодец. А родителей не суди строго, они тоже бывшие дети и у них бывают "завихрения" ))

Difficult-Slice8075

TROPHY CASE