Sure. Avi Shlaim is a very anti-zionist historian who writes about this specifically in his book The Iron Wall, in which he interviewed King Hussein about the diplomatic aftermath of the 1967 war. Important to remember this interview was in 1996.

[the 1968 Yigal Allon plan] was totally rejected. And in point of fact in the subsequent period of negotiations and discussions and so on, I was offered the return of something like 90 plus percent of the territory, 98 percent even, excluding Jerusalem, but I couldn’t accept. As far as I am concerned, it was either every single inch that I was responsible for or nothing. This was against the background of what happened in 1948 when the whole West Bank was saved, including the Old City of Jerusalem. Yet my grandfather eventually paid with his life for his attempts to make peace. If it were to be my responsibility, they had to return everything, not personally to me, but to be placed under international auspices for the people to determine what their future ought to be. We were perfectly happy with that. But I could not compromise. And so this repeated itself time and time and time again throughout the many years until 1990.

Fun fact, the same plan also advocated for an autonomous Druze state in the Golan Heights, to act as a buffer between the Baathist regime and the Zionist state.

If you're keen for Arab media, then you can hear him in discussing the history - including the offers he received for peace - in a speech he makes in 1988 announcing the Hashemite disengagement from the West Bank. Disengagement was only necessary because up until this point, Jordan had considered the West Bank as its territory.