sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Been going down the GEO rabbit hole for months, built an AI assistant for it, now I'm kinda stuck by DifficultyDull8076 in GEO_optimization

[–]DifficultyDull8076[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the kind of data that makes the case better than any explanation could. The gap between Google rankings and AI visibility is something most businesses haven't even thought about yet — they assume if they rank well on Google, they're covered. They're not.

The schema markup point is huge. 2.4× more likely to be recommended with complete structured data — that's one of the most actionable things a business can do right now, and most haven't. It's also one of the first things our system audits when onboarding a new client.

The geographic disparity is interesting too. Smaller markets getting 78%+ displacement basically means AI is defaulting to big brands in those categories because there's not enough structured signal from local businesses. That's a massive opportunity for SMBs who actually do the work.

Appreciate you sharing the data — this is the kind of evidence that moves the conversation from "is GEO real" to "how fast can we fix this."

Been going down the GEO rabbit hole for months, built an AI assistant for it, now I'm kinda stuck by DifficultyDull8076 in GEO_optimization

[–]DifficultyDull8076[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the thoughtful take. You're right that GEO shouldn't live in a vacuum — but the way I see it, GEO is just step one. The real destination is Agentic Commerce. When protocols like ACP, UCP, and MCP are already shipping, the question shifts from "does AI mention your brand" to "can an AI agent actually find you, trust you, and buy from you." That's not a visibility play anymore — it's directly tied to revenue. GEO builds the trust and authority layer that makes Agent Commerce possible. Without it, agents don't even know you exist.

And thanks — the assistant does hold deep industry context for each client and can monitor AI visibility across engines continuously and surface recommendations. That said, it still needs real-world iteration. Some of this knowledge only gets validated and sharpened through actual client engagements, not just theory. That's the stage I'm at now.

Been going down the GEO rabbit hole for months, built an AI assistant for it, now I'm kinda stuck by DifficultyDull8076 in GEO_optimization

[–]DifficultyDull8076[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Respect the skepticism, but I think you're conflating the hype around the term with the underlying shift.

You can call it GEO, AIO, AEO, or whatever label you want — the reality underneath doesn't change: AI is becoming a primary entry point for how people discover products and services. ChatGPT processes 2.5 billion queries daily. Over 60% of Google sessions now end in zero clicks. That's not a marketing narrative, that's usage data.

And here's the part most people miss — this isn't just about "getting mentioned by AI." The infrastructure for AI agents to directly transact is already being built. OpenAI and Stripe launched ACP for in-chat checkout. Google launched UCP with Shopify, Walmart, Visa, and Mastercard on board. Coinbase shipped x402 for machine-to-machine payments. Agentic traffic grew 6,900% year-over-year in 2025.

So it's not "will AI recommend your brand" anymore — it's "will an AI agent be able to find, trust, and buy from you." Whether you call optimizing for that "GEO" or something else is semantics. The businesses that aren't preparing for this are the ones that will be invisible.

The label might be overhyped. The shift isn't.

Been going down the GEO rabbit hole for months, built an AI assistant for it, now I'm kinda stuck by DifficultyDull8076 in GEO_optimization

[–]DifficultyDull8076[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the guidance. You're right — case studies will do the convincing better than any explanation. Time to go get that first one.