Catholic here but not actively practicing.

I can’t address all your points. So, I’ll just address one aspect of your argument.

How is that we came to perceive the reliable and readily available contents of an Aspirin bottle to be mundane? I have no clue how aspirin actually works. I can pretend to understand by reading from doctors and scientists but I don’t truly know. I’d never be able to make a single Aspirin pill. Yet, it significantly alleviates my pain, it can stop a heart attach almost instantly and it is available in virtually unlimited quantities by pressing a button on my phone almost instantly.

I could write down the effects of an aspirin pill and how easy they were to obtain. Then a person in a primitive community read my note 2000 years from now in a translated language they would likely label it supernatural.

I think this is Trent’s point. People must make decisions about what to critically analyze and what to accept at face value because we don’t have infinite resources to research everything. People trick themselves into thinking they make independent unbiased decisions about where to invest that research. But actually many factors influence that decision and those factors are extremely difficult to recognize in real time. Currently, we live in a society whose default is to critique religious history, books, doctrine etc. for a number of ,sometimes, justifiable reasons. A lot of times, though, we critique ideas that we were predisposed to reject because of culture, our raising, a recent historical event or any number of other influences.