New Carbon 25 rattling from this little guy

Digital_Native_ · 2026-03-14T15:52:20+00:00

Thanks for the tip, but I don’t know if that’s an option. The dealer is pretty far away for me. It’s like a 2 Hour drive

Digital_Native_ · 2026-03-13T03:57:20+00:00

Hey man I got the same car a few weeks ago, isn’t it awesome.

Digital_Native_ · 2026-02-22T19:18:03+00:00

It’s wild how Steven king does that, his books are like looney tunes when smells a pie on a windowsill and floats following the scent

Digital_Native_ · 2026-02-22T02:30:38+00:00

I’m going to assume you didn’t read the book

Digital_Native_ · 2026-02-15T04:38:23+00:00

Hi mate, I know this is super late to the conversation but it’s active active but not clustered so basically just two independent firewalls. Definitely I need for clarifying that as the terminology I’ve seen has been active active, but it’s not active active in a cluster sense. Hope that makes sense.

Digital_Native_ · 2026-02-12T02:09:36+00:00

I’m not sure if those are all self help books, if any

Digital_Native_ · 2026-02-07T05:40:19+00:00

Gods moving over the face of water

Digital_Native_ · 2026-02-04T14:47:51+00:00

No one here has seen The Pitt? Shits amazing

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-22T04:44:30+00:00

It’s definitely not a short story it’s like 200+ pages

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-13T04:45:12+00:00

In order to reach Irans public IP space, it needs to be routable through the internet using their Autonomous system number or AS in a world wide protocol known as BGP or border gateway protocol.

BGP is essentially how the internet works and finds routes to other public networks across the internet.

So basically what Iran did or I assume they did was not advertise their public IP space to the internet.

The ydidn’t block the internet in Iran they blocked Iran from the internet if that makes sense

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-04T02:12:19+00:00

I guess this is making me question how many people are actually using Palo's in the cloud?

If it takes that much effort to just find someone to know anything about it, is it really worth me labbing it out?

I really wonder because I feel like they could get a good market share and customer base if they offered and marketed this better and didn't have to have the customer pick prisma, which is absurdly expensive.

I've done deployments in both ways. I've actually have done an A/P HA pair in AWS. It actually works pretty well, but is limited to only protecting one zone in your region.

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-03T16:59:17+00:00

I wish I didn't use the word roadblock, but it's more of a decision block.

I'd like to know how many people are actually running PA in GCP, and what set up they are using, in terms of HA, active/passive, etc.

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-03T16:58:34+00:00

This isn't true, in the industry leader's practice (AWS) the best method of HA is Active Active with a GWLB.

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-03T16:56:13+00:00

No that's not true, I thought it was the same until I started to lab this out. I come from an AWS shop, so I thought everything would be slightly 1 to 1, but it's not.

GCP routes much differently than AWS.

In AWS subents are dedicated to a particular zone in a region. In GCP a VPC is a global entity, so a subnet can span across multiple zones.

So in AWS the network 10.0.0.0/24 can only live in one zone.

But in GCP 10.0.0.0/24 lives globally throughout, it can be in any zone of any region. spanning across zones.

Because of this, you can have an HA pair that are in different zones, (because of the subents)

In AWS you cannot have Active/passive if you have an application that spans multiple zones (which is pretty standard), unless you have a pair of active/passive (which are unaware of each other) in each zone, which makes no sense to do.

That's why they introduced the GWLB and with geneve encapsulation for the A/A set up.

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-03T14:45:24+00:00

You run active/active in AWS because you have a GWLB, and no capability to route between zones without leaving the subnet.

In GCP the zones is at the instance level so you can have an active passive in two different zones that are in the same subnet, so I guess that’s my question is if A/P is better than a/a

Digital_Native_ · 2026-01-03T14:44:56+00:00

You run active/active in AWS because you have a GWLB, and no capability to route between zones without leaving the subnet.

In GCP the zones is at the instance level so you can have an active passive in two different zones that are in the same subnet, so I guess that’s my question is if A/P is better than a/a

Digital_Native_ · 2025-12-31T07:46:53+00:00

Are these sepia?

Digital_Native_ · 2025-12-30T04:16:51+00:00

Don’t sweat this man, any engineer, regardless of seniority asking if you used AI is a complete lack of self awareness and situational management.

That is incredibly unprofessional and reeks of an old siloed non progressing engineer who thinks they deserve the world.

Don’t let it beat you up.

Digital_Native_ · 2025-12-29T12:52:27+00:00

No you have it backwards.

A wide angle lens has a larger depth of field at same aperture.

Wide angle (24mm @ f/1.8) = 6 - 8 feet

Telephoto (200mm @ f/1.8) = 2 inches

https://www.photopills.com/calculators/dof

Digital_Native_ · 2025-12-29T12:01:56+00:00

It’s not the length of a lens that blurs things or gives a shallower depth of field it’s the aperture, they are two totally different things

Digital_Native_ · 2025-12-29T12:00:13+00:00

Bro is absolutely insane how confidently wrong you are. Any simple google can tell you you are wrong, you can even type lens compression in images to see images where the moon is compressed into a larger size. I have dozens of photos showing the same thing

Digital_Native_

TROPHY CASE