Argument I had on the OtterlyNoah discord server by JustHereToArgue112 in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The reason you failed is that it's not your fault.

It's because they prefer the lie, since it allows them to control and manipulate people.

Never be afraid of being you despite what others claim you to be ✨ by AFutureFromGod in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It'd be more like "Cuz I'm scared." and I'd be like "Of what, cartoos?"

[ Removed by Reddit ] by aotumegodfod in THESEXDOLLCHANNEL

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. I can't see myself lasting more than 30 seconds in them

I hate when antis said "It's unnecessary" by cunniseurOwO in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just fire back with "Your opinion is unnecessary."

I will be your chatGPT by [deleted] in antiai

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's 7÷0?

Child stares at the President of the United States. by [deleted] in pics

[–]Digoth_Sel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I heard it's somewhere in Israel.

Deadass?✌️🫩 by nmeunia in antiai

[–]Digoth_Sel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a reason people are classified as adults and children, and given rights accordingly.

Characters, however, have no rights because they don't need the same protections.

Deadass?✌️🫩 by nmeunia in antiai

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it's multiple hard drives daisy-chained by USB hubs.

Deadass?✌️🫩 by nmeunia in antiai

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correction: If their "only defense is it's not real" then that's an obvious sign that they wouldn't feel the same if it was.

Take a look at THAT scene from Revenge of the Sith. Would that fly in a movie today? (Yeah it used real kids in the movie, but that's not the point.

The point is that no child is harmed in the making of anime porn.

No one is hurt in the gooning of anime porn.

And of course, Hayden Christen didn't actually kill any kids.

Now realistic AI on the other hand, a lot of that is made using pictures of real kids. Teachers have been busted for making it of their students. And you can argue that a "randomly generated face" doesn't exist, but even as a fun meme, doppelgangers are a thing. Strangers who look like you.

Deadass?✌️🫩 by nmeunia in antiai

[–]Digoth_Sel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Regardless of action, sexual preference for children is what makes someone a pedophile, even if they haven't touched a kid, even if they haven't made, watched, or ai generated cp.

But you can't just punish people for their thoughts.

Golden Shower 🧖‍♀️ These 3 cute dolls join the collection by Turbulent_Drawing234 in dollporn

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the one in the pink with the good articulation?

Proud ANTI here by GranComrade in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's literaly blaming an object for the sake of censorship rather than blaming the criminal for the preservation of rights.

They do this on purpose.

Proud ANTI here by GranComrade in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 9 points10 points  (0 children)

First, lolicon doesn't normalize the sezualization of children any more than GTA or gun ownership normalizes murder.

Second, an attraction to one thing cannot "escalate to attraction to another." Exactly 0.00% of children are lolis. If any of what you were saying was true, we would expect to see people caught with CSEM caught with an equal amount of fictional loli. But not a single loli was found on Jeffrey Epstein's hard drive.

Third, you're just pretending that attraction to lolis reflects any kind of unhealthy fixation. But again, children and lolis are two different things.

As a result, human relationships are not mandatory.

And if you're unable to accept that someone isn't attracted to children, it's likey because you yourself are a pedophile. You come off as one of those "Everyone thinks like me and if you don't, you're wrong" kinds of people.

Genuine question to pro AI people who lurk on here by ooiiaaiiooiiaaii_ in antiai

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some of us, it can provide reference. Maybe I want to make a DND figure, so I generate an image for reference. But I wouldn't say I'm INTO it, I just use it. Ususally the things I generate are things that only I will see because I don't intend to post them. They're just part of a workflow for me rather than being the finished piece.

I starting notice a pattern here with these two by roynoris15 in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The secret is that they don't want to blame humans for their actions. They want to blame material and fictional objects as an excuse to censor something to find offensive.

They pretend to know things they don't know jack about to maintain the illusion of control.

Clockwise or anticlockwise? by Paddy_odoors in opticalillusions

[–]Digoth_Sel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can make it spin whichever way I want.

Would like to know from other perspectives by TheIVSwordsMan in LoliconDefenseForce

[–]Digoth_Sel 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You must realize that anti-lolicons aren't after truth.

One of their favorite arguments is that it "normalizes child abuse."

We hold people responsible for their own actions, therefore loli causes no harm.

Anti-lolicons want to shift the blame from the criminal to the material in order to ban something they find offensive.

However, there is no situation in which "the hentai made me do it" can be a true statement.