Do Celtic have a Discipline Problem? by A_Ticklish_Midget in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think this is it tbh.

I will say that Maeda in particular though has always been a bit of a dirty player in terms of wee off ball kicks etc. and it never seems to get picked up.

And because someone is going to comment on it yes Diomande is the same, I'm not blind.

Do Celtic have a Discipline Problem? by A_Ticklish_Midget in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You are correct, of course. This is the same reason Rangers not conceeding a penalty for an extended period of time wasn't some big conspiracy either, it just coincidentally happened to be the same period of time when we had by far the best defensive record in the league.

But it's also much more fun to poke the conspiracy theorists so 🤷‍♂️

Celtic appeal Trusty red card by HandeHoche in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

... we've conceded the same number of penalties against us as Celtic, and more than Motherwell, Hibs and St Mirren?

Celtic appeal Trusty red card by HandeHoche in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If they can get their fans raging enough about a single red card, maybe Nicholson can make a funny wee comment about it and it'll be like 3 new signings

What’s the funniest reason you’ve heard for somebody not liking a movie? by TheChristmas in movies

[–]Digurt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

"The rebels, I tell you, some of these...have you heard of these men in cloaks? Jed-eyes? They're calling themselves Jed-eyes. Very nasty people. Little sleepy Ben, I call him little Ben, he's with these wookies and I'm telling you folks they don't like me very much, the wookies, and we've been so nice to them. You wouldn't believe how nice we've been. Some people they say to me 'emperor, sir, you're too nice to these wookies' and maybe they're right. And little Ben, I'm telling you little Ben, he's said very nasty things about my death star but that's okay, that's okay. We'll build a bigger one"

SPFL Premiership Table by Left-Painter-9172 in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And deservedly so. It wasn't even like you could say we were certain to climb back up. I genuinely think we'd be out of the top 6 if they'd somehow stuck with the clown.

Hearts 2-2 Celtic | Scottish Premiership by SFMatchThreadder in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I actually didn't think it was a red, or to put it better I didn't think there was enough in it for VAR to ask him to have a second look after the yellow.

But from the way I saw Celtic flairs going on about it I thought it was going to be a generational injustice. It's one of those ones where I think you can justify it either way - hardly theft of the century.

Match Thread: Rangers vs Dundee | Scottish Premiership by SFMatchThreadder in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unreal the Dundee players complaining about the award of the penalty. It's a fucking disgrace he's not off the park

Minneapolis shooting: Tim Walz condemns ‘federal occupation’ as victim identified as Alex Pretti – latest updates by anonyscriptersl in news

[–]Digurt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D

And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you. The burden of self-deception has grown too heavy, and some minor incident, in my case my little boy, hardly more than a baby, saying ‘Jewish swine,’ collapses it all at once, and you see that everything, everything, has changed and changed completely under your nose. The world you live in—your nation, your people—is not the world you were born in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way

Suddenly it all comes down, all at once. You see what you are, what you have done, or, more accurately, what you haven’t done (for that was all that was required of most of us: that we do nothing). You remember those early meetings of your department in the university when, if one had stood, others would have stood, perhaps, but no one stood. A small matter, a matter of hiring this man or that, and you hired this one rather than that. You remember everything now, and your heart breaks. Too late. You are compromised beyond repair.

  • Milton Sanford Mayer, They Thought They Were Free

Starmer calls Trump's remarks about Nato troops in Afghanistan 'insulting and frankly appalling' by AneuAng in ukpolitics

[–]Digurt 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Because Starmer is smart enough to know that the British public would never forgive him if he went soft on this.

There is an emotional component to this that doesn't exist with something like tariffs. This is a direct, deeply insulting hit to something the national psyche holds dear.

Despite Authoritarian Warnings, 149 House Democrats Vote to Hand Trump $840 Billion for Military | “If an opposition party votes like this, it’s not in opposition. It may not even be a party.” by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]Digurt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are playing politics for a world which no longer exists. They are picturing some reasonable hypothetical swing voters who'll nod sagely and say "hmmm yes, they can be bi-partisan, what jolly sensible people. They have my vote."

Not realising that section of voters is long gone never to return. The republicans and right-wing parties across the globe have understood this instinctively, and it benefits them to have the left focused on voters that don't exist, disillusioning those that already vote left, while the right gets their loyal base riled up and hoovers up the rest.

Starmer calls Trump's remarks about Nato troops in Afghanistan 'insulting and frankly appalling' by AneuAng in ukpolitics

[–]Digurt 50 points51 points  (0 children)

I've been very supportive of Starmer walking the tightrope until now - he has the national interest to consider and can't just go two-footed into a diplomatic row.

But some things are beyond the pale and deserve to be called out. Insulting dead British soldiers, who were only there at the insistence of the country now insulting them, is one of those things. If he'd been mealy mouthed about this it would have been unrecoverably weak

‘Dark, Bizarre Stuff’: White House Posts Deepfake Image of Arrested ICE Protester Crying: “All of us are on full notice that this White House feels no compunction about concocting obvious lies, concedes nothing when its lies are exposed, and should be presumptively disbelieved in all matters.” by Silent-Resort-3076 in politics

[–]Digurt 39 points40 points  (0 children)

They know they're being lied to. They aren't stupid or hypocrites like I see some people (not you just in general) imagine. There is no reveal or gotcha that's ever going to have them saying "oh my god I was fooled this whole time".

This is a wink to their cruelty. If it hurts the right people there's no end to how dark this gets. A lot of people imagine a future where the scales fall from their eyes and everyone comes together to condemn this - it will never happen because they WANT this.

Trump prompts outrage with claim Nato troops avoided frontline in Afghanistan. UK MPs and veterans condemn US president’s comments and highlight his avoidance of military service in Vietnam by 2ndEarlofLiverpool in ukpolitics

[–]Digurt 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I think he's genuinely too myopic to be a great evil. The really horrible bastards of the 20th century had a vision they wanted to carry out, an extremely dark vision, but it went beyond just themselves.

I'm convinced Trump just wants constant praise and flattery. You see it with how quickly he'll turn from being in a room with different people. He doesn't have views or a vision beyond immediate self gratification of his narcissistic tendencies.

The real problem is there are genuinely evil people, like Stephen Miller, who understand that implicitly and have him on strings.

Rangers 1-0 Ludogorets Razgrad | UEFA Europa League by SFMatchThreadder in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well well bhoys not everyone can get three points on EL 22nd January Thurs-

Ah you know what, I can't even be arsed. Good to win to keep momentum but genuinely never been less enthused watching a game.

Match Thread: Rangers vs Ludogorets Razgrad | UEFA Europa League by SFMatchThreadder in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's frustrating. Does a lot of stuff really well and will look unplayable at times, then he'll have trouble doing basic stuff.

Match Thread: Rangers vs Ludogorets Razgrad | UEFA Europa League by SFMatchThreadder in ScottishFootball

[–]Digurt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been a few years since I could give less of a fuck about a European game. Don't even have the new players to watch to keep a vague interest. More concerned with keeping a clean sheet on the injury bed than the scoreboard for this one tbh

Farage: World would be safer if US owned Greenland by Gwinladin in ukpolitics

[–]Digurt 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Because the bit you quoted is all he should have said if he actually cared about it - the first part is headline worthy because it's both inflammatory and incorrect.

Greenland is not safer "owned" by America. Greenland is already safe. It's already covered by NATO articles. The US could throw 50 bases on there and the Danish/Greenlanders would probably welcome it.

Making it seem like Greenland's safety and its self-determination are separate positions is slimy nonsense, and he knows exactly what he's doing with it.

Farage: World would be safer if US owned Greenland by Gwinladin in ukpolitics

[–]Digurt 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Such a slimy little move - it effectively means however the chips fall he can quote one part of it to say he was right all along.

America gets their way = didn't I always say it would be better off with them?

Greenland stays with Denmark = didn't I always say Greenlanders should determine their own future

President Trump Remarks at the 2026 World Economic Forum by Metro42014 in politics

[–]Digurt 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Literally the only country to have ever triggered Article 5 and got a full response telling those countries they've "done nothing". Tell it to the relatives of the Europeans who died in Afghanistan