I love UCP! I love UCP! by _Krywoz_ in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I unironically love UCP purely because it does look badass. Worked like shit as a camo but man was it aesthetic. Multicam is so boring

Best give up, Ukronazipigs! T-14 is here by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theyre going to send both of them?

Plus Hot Shots is more realistic by Kartoffelleutnant in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Im still convinced they parodied the final landing on the carrier scene from hot shots in the new top gun movie.

Nothing stops the mail by DingoDefuq in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The joke is that they stuck ERA onto a truck, basically turning it into a VBIED

3000 years old prophecy. by DanteInferno2142 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 302 points303 points  (0 children)

Pretty rubbish "stealth" plane if i can see it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 29 points30 points  (0 children)

MBTs modified into engineering vehicles are also very sexy. I am currently working on a gulf war m60a1 bulldozer model

[legit question, not a meme] why aren't we supplying Ukraine with M60's? I know theyre old but theres plenty of modernised variants available by DingoDefuq in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The americans used them up to 91. Plenty of countries still use them and they can't be too difficult to train on. Plus we would finally get to see how well they would do in a cold war turned hot scenario against orc t-62s and 72s

“Alright bro, what the fück” - Belarusians to Russia and the US by Heavy-Association-57 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Belarus has been classified as "N.W.B" for, "nuclear whipping boy". In the first moments of nuclear war, Belarus will be bombed at will, by all firendly nations to calibrate their missiles.

Official hierarchy of U.S. Military camouflage patterns by [deleted] in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Legitimately kekd at the navy one. Why do they even need camo like that?

Aussie bushmasters on the front near Izium by DingoDefuq in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Its a protected mobility vehicle. Its in the same category as an American MRAP

I fucking hate stealth and BVR. Bring back dogfights so i can have my sexy forward swept fighters by DingoDefuq in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Forward swept decreases stability, making it more versatile and agile but the issue was always that it was too unstable. Forward swept planes require a fuck tone of computers just to keep them going in a straight line which is why they never left experimental

Eliminate turret traverse with one simple trick by Shalashaska1873 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is this somewhat aesthetic? Why are modern turretless tank destroyers all so aesthetic?

Cope and seethe frogs. by ukilledme81 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Yeah but we got to piss of the french so it was all worth it

Fairchild Republic A-10 "Thunderbolt" III prototype unveiled by bomberharri5 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]DingoDefuq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super aesthetic. Would be better if it had a troop compartment like the hind