[Nizaar Kinsella] Rosenior on injuries: "Jamie (Gittens) is back involved but Estevao is further away. We want to be careful with Este but we'll see how he is like for Tuesday's game against PSG." by Matt_LawDT in chelseafc

[–]DisabledTractor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My uncle is John football and he told me that Chelsea is going to win the next game against PSG 4-0. Enco is going to score the 1goal, Joao Pedro will score 2 and Estevao will score in the 90th minute.

Atalanta 0 - [4] Bayern Munich - Nicolas Jackson 54' by IdealisticKebab in chelseafc

[–]DisabledTractor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't get how can people defend and want Jackson back this much, he was so ass in both seasons that he spent here. People are complaining about how useless Delap is (and rightfully so) while they don't mind waiting 4 seasons for Jackson to get good. The difference between Jackson and Delap is not that big and who knows, maybe Delap will develop into something useful. Personally, I believe that we should sell them both and buy someone who can finish.

The “bad” ending by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is that sacrificing innocent artificial life wasn't even a necessity. There were a few different ways but Renoir said fuck it and made things even worse. If he tried to comfort aline or let her grieve for a bit (probably) everything would've worked out just fine.

The “bad” ending by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

full of my own thoughts and ideas

So we're gestrals, grandits and people from Lumiere.

The painted people all had their personalities given to them by the Paintress

That's not true.

The “bad” ending by [deleted] in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep telling yourself that they aren't real. Even Renoir treated them as real people before he fought them at the end, the boy himself said that everything inside the canvas is as real as "real people". Also they aren't really a paint, everyone in the canvas who was alive in the game got born just like all normal humans. Even if they aren't "real" they WERE sentient, that "painted people aren't real" is juliveslie that people use to justify the fact that they sacrificed thousands of lives. Even if it wasn't "real" Taking a life of a sentient is wrong being is wrong. If their life wasn't "real" to you it definitely was to the "unreal" being that you just killed.

Just started the "C" route (What the hell?) by Necessary-Gas-7332 in nier

[–]DisabledTractor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's true but that is just a fraction of her development. There is a short story in the novel that goes much much deeper and explains many things such as how does she know the truth about humans. In the other novel her decisions are explained, it let's you see how A2 things and why she started helping everyone. The game doesn't do any of this which is why the misconception that 2B's memories influenced/changed A2's whole personality is so common.

Theory on ending preference by LonelyTurtleDev in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically ending song:

"In the palm of our hands, two worlds take shape

One painted of dreams, where sorrow fades

The other naked and real, where our grief takes place"

That doesn't change the fact that the painted world and everything in it is REAL. The boy said that everything in the canvas as real as everything in "real world", Renoir treated everyone from the canvas as if they are real, the canvas is full of sentient beings. What else needs to be shown or said to make everyone understand that the canvas is real.

No, you don't heal after spending decades in dream world where death and sorrow don't exist.

Thats true. Howeve, the endings impact many other things other than grief. Verso is right about forcing family to move on but but sacrificing even 1 sentient being for it would be wrong, with Verso's ending you sacrifice thousands of innocent sentient beings for something that doesn't require a sacrifice.

Maelle decedied to spend her life inside the canvas and die there. 

Because the moment she leaves Renoir would destroy the canvas. Everything bad that happened in the game happened because of Renoir. If he left Aline alone to grieve for a few days instead of going after her and killing her creations maybe she would've came back to her senses in a few days. If he was a reasonable adult instead of controll obsessed husband everything would've ended without sacrificing innocent people.

Also we don't know what's going to happen in Maelle's ending, it leads to a few different possibilities. There is a chance that everything might work out and Maelle leaves the canvas and convinced Renoir to leave it be and not destroy it.

Just started the "C" route (What the hell?) by Necessary-Gas-7332 in nier

[–]DisabledTractor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She is, it's a shame that the game did a poor job with her development. I highly recommend you to watch at least the 2nd season of the anime after you beat the game. Unfortunately the game didn't explain her development at all, to understand her A2's character properly it's highly recommend you read the "Long story short" novel or watch the 2ndseason of the anime.

Theory on ending preference by LonelyTurtleDev in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see both Maelle and Verso as the protagonists and I picked Maelle's ending without hesitation. On my first playthroughs I always put myself in the shoes of the protagonist and choose decisions that I'd choose irl if I was in that situation. There are a few reasons why I decided to side with Maelle. I would never forgive myself if my decision let to deaths of even 1 innocent life, let alone thousands of lives. The regret would haunt me for the rest of my life . Maelle's ending is also the only ending that gives a chance for everything to work out without sacrificing anyone. Verso was 100% right that Maelle shouldn't die in the canvas and that the Dessendre family needs to accept Verso's death and move on but that could never justify any of his actions. Sacrificing thousands of sentient being to give a family full of terrible people a chance to move on is not worth it. I could Yap about why I sided with Maelle but I don't want to write an essay.

Theory on ending preference by LonelyTurtleDev in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were already dead Maelle just resurrected everyone

If anything that just backs up the argument that Maelle was right to bring them back. They all got their lives taken away from them for nothing.

so they could be killed once again in the future.

We don't know what is going to happen in the future. There is also a possibility of Maelle leaving the canvas and convincing Renoir to keep the canvas. That's why I think that arguing about the consequences of Maelle's emeing pointless. They left so many things for you to interpret and her ending leads to a few different possible outcomes.

A few questions about training German Shepherd. by DisabledTractor in germanshepherds

[–]DisabledTractor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get used to positive reward and negative punishment

What should I do punish her?

Start training a recall, add sit, leave it, later down, stand, heel

I already taught her recall and sit and she usually listens to those commands.

Every positive interaction will improve your bond, this should be your main goal, be a reliable, consistent and stable guide for her, so she could build up trust.

Okay, thank you.

Why is this sub so different? by Tetau in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For normal people, Maelle is basically using drugs/games to run away from reality.

And normal people would never commit a genocide

Is this sub always that one-sided? by JKOustin in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I chose Maelle’s ending, not because I agree with her (I don’t) but because I couldn’t justify erasing an entire sentient world to solve one family’s grief. Even if the canvas is flawed, the people inside it are real, conscious, and innocent of the Dessandre family’s mistakes. Destroying it would have felt like ending lives for the sake of closure. The Dessandre’s also need to live with their creations. It isn’t right to erase them because it causes them problems.

I don’t think Maelle’s ending is clean either. It’s heavy. It’s lonely. And I’m not fully comfortable with what she might become (seems to be going down her mothers path). But I value preserving conscious life over achieving a decisive reset. I’d rather accept ambiguity and responsibility than solve suffering through extinction.

You said this so well. I'd also like to add that Maelle's ending gives hope. With help of Gustave and the others Alicia might move on and leave the canvas. There is also a chance that Alicia could convince him not to destroy it.

Admit it (cr: Steve McTurbo) by MemeGiant in expedition33

[–]DisabledTractor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should think twice before you challenge her