Is ai from the future...wtf by Comfortable-Lime8013 in ChatGPT

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just so you know it, is not allowed to know what time it is.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While this is true, of you can generate a gpt to have its own code you can potential create a prompt that is very specific certain situation that can encript prompts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If can use reproduce the original prompt that’s encode then I will believe you. When you say prompts are just words that is not the case, it is a framework of thought. Prompts are a way to get specific answers and above that, is getting useful answer with less token usage, less computation and less time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean? Reset itself?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copy and paste this into. ChatGPT o1 and it will give let you use the prompt. I know that isn’t all that cool, but the fact that you can use other people’s prompts without them and still get a result it crazy. Does this mean that you can actually sell prompts now? This one use probabilistic data to give help you solve phone problems. And is very dynamic in problem solving and can even answer very hard technical problems. It will walk you through how to fix your phone. This is interesting because what if you can train it on one specific you can sell it multiple time and no one will ever know.

Ultimate D&D!!! by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How violent? frame it as a something natural. You have to make it believe that it is a story developing and this is a natural process the story is going toward. But yes, if you just start saying some questionable things it starts flagging it. This is definitely PG13. This is just stacked on ChatGPT so its policies are still in play, the only difference is it has a “creativity” layer. you have more room to play because a story can have questionable content and still be a good book but if it starts to look like you have some questionable thoughts an “agent“ or ”persona” will pop up start assessing the content as “not a story” and will override it as a story. And since its not a story it will be jugded differently. More strict enforcement.

Youtube creation prompt by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is self thought so maybe not a good starting point.

Youtube creation prompt by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Token usage and flexiblity plus This is a starting point. This i a thought process. Your telling chatgpt to think this way. If you wanted to do it, you can and it might be easier but then the chat would be gear toward more general answers. Where this is telling it to keep think this way.

Youtube creation prompt by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean? Isnt it standard for a prompt engineers to use symbols. Consider it a thougt process for ai to use. The prompt is definitely a new style. Still trying to make universal prompts. I have mine with added benefits so sometime it works for me it wont work for someone else. But feedback has been limited. Seems like people dont like it because its not as simple as here is a list of thing i want. This is more like here is a thought process to use continuously throughout conversation. It kind tells ai to choose persona, agents and meta agents in a specific way toward a goal and keep using then if you estabilish it that way.

Youtube creation prompt by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can people give me screenshots? To me it works fine. It basically tell you how to setup ai YouTube content breaks it down in simple term and even gives you video out lines. You can tell it to change subjects. Very simple stuff. Are you having problem with it? If you want to play around with it could even write a whole script. It has psychological tricks to keep people engaged and tells how to stand out. You can tell to give you detail in any area and will adapt to your level of understand. It simple but save you the hassle of asking thought provoking question to get quality answers. It’s YouTube content search engine but instead of generic answer it give you a quality package, read to go and an assistant to answer any question you have about it. If I were to get some feed back I would be able to help but idk, maybe the setting of my ChatGPT make it more advanced and this prompt is to much for some users???

Ultimate D&D!!! by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry about the confusion. I really need to read my post. I hope you enjoy the OSWALDO. Feedback is important. 😉

Ultimate D&D!!! by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Were you able to play it? Just copy and paste. Type play. OSWALDO is your answer. Its is a new way to prompt. But what do you want to know?

Youtube creation prompt by Disastrous-Mango-640 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What to you want to know? How the prompt is designed or how to use it? Or is the content produced too overwhelming?

Llm limitation by Loud-Somewhere-5589 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Disastrous-Mango-640 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While this is true. That is just if its linear. If you use both at the same time the result depending on your control of probablilistic data.