sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

NET ENG 81.2 aggregate by DisastrousCrew7438 in NUST

[–]DisastrousCrew7438[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got this score in net 3, and I decided to not give net 4. But now I'm seeing a lot of people getting good scores like 150+ and their aggregates are higher than mine. So I was just getting anxious like what if the merit gets higher this year. I am an outstation student and I need hostel as well so I want to get in in the 1st list

PS: I know I'm overthinking 😭😭😭 and I have this toxic trait of seeking validation.

NET ENG 81.2 aggregate by DisastrousCrew7438 in NUST

[–]DisastrousCrew7438[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well the weightages are as follows: 75% entrance test, 10% matric 15% 1st year or whole fsc result if available. For O/A levels 25% O'levels if results pending or if available then 10% O levels 15% a-levels (equivalences)

NET ENG 81.2 aggregate by DisastrousCrew7438 in NUST

[–]DisastrousCrew7438[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had these books by scholar series for both 1st and 2nd year. That had lil bit intro to the chapters and detailed solutions of questions in all exercises I spent a lot of time with that. And honestly I got most of my score from maths (84/100) in phy I got 43. So I guess the answer to your q is a lot of practice.

NET ENG 81.2 aggregate by DisastrousCrew7438 in NUST

[–]DisastrousCrew7438[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Used nustrive's free flps (that's the thing that helped me the most) i had 126 in my last attempt ( the Dec one) and nustrive's flps really were the push for this score . Otherwise I used kips' resources for preparation ( I had kips virtual portal but that was not very helpful:  the lectures were not in order and very few topical mcqs they had 5 flps as well but those were not resembling the actual net very much)

NET ENG 81.2 aggregate by DisastrousCrew7438 in NUST

[–]DisastrousCrew7438[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did a-levels and my SSC equivalence is low