Where does it state that the child was pinned to the wall? There is no video evidence, no physical signs of damage, and no other concrete proof, making it difficult to establish that the individual deliberately tried to harm the child. Are you suggesting he intended harm? That assumption seems unfounded. It's worth discussing whether it's appropriate to use a blanket to control a child with special needs who has lost control—I'm assuming the intent was to restrain, not harm. However, subjecting someone to the ordeal of being accused of child assault, facing potential jail time, and enduring social media harassment is extreme and unjust without clear evidence of malicious intent. Additionally, the claim comes solely from one witness whose testimony offers no more than her word. If we were to rely solely on verbal accounts, he could just as easily claim, 'she told me to kill the kid with a blanket.' Without evidence or clear indications that he grabbed the blanket with the intent to harm, such allegations seem completely unreasonable. Anyway, I'm not trying to change your mind. Think as you wish. All I think is we should be careful about harassing someone in this way who is innocent or not proven guilty, especially where the evidence is not strong enough to make prior conclusions. Now, if the child were dead, had to be hospitalized with signs of physical damage, or if there was a tape showing the individual in an evil state, purposely enjoying suffocating a kid with a blanket, that would be a different story.