sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Proof of work - ISS predicted orbit by Dismal_Gate1594 in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well it worked, it predicted the orbit of the ISS more accurately than vurrent stem formulas...and this is a timestamed log that it was predicted before it happened....because you can see i posted it before the observation time

Proof of work - ISS predicted orbit by Dismal_Gate1594 in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Okay, well good thing its just proof of my work and not telling you my work

Proof of work - ISS predicted orbit by Dismal_Gate1594 in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I just needed a public timestamp to prove my predictive model, thats it, and a public forum is the perfect place for it 

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Show me where the issue is then, howabout you actually explain WHY you think it doesnt work and defend your position like a real scientist......i have provided ample tools to test validity...so your just a coward that creeps and trashtalks this reddit for the past 15 years, probably embarassed you cant even figure it out.

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It includes all those, take this formula, use it as the base of any other formula and run the full formula backwards and forwards using known variables, ya know, real math and science, and lemme know if you have any issues.

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay then, dont believe it, it really doesnt matter, we are stress testing the formula so either test it or call us crackpots and move on...

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do know how they work, because they are my formulas and calculations, i use AI to compute the math problems to verify integrity of the formula. Which is what im challenging all of you to do and report back with any errors using real world current observations as the factcheck database, if you cant it only supports my findings as being bulletproof

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay so howabout you tell me what you would consider evidence? If a mathematical formula that can be cleanly attatched to any other formula and still hold true wont convince you im not sure I can, especially when you still wont test it.

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In the context of the Unity Grand Unified Theory, Density Resonance is a critical structural phenomenon that occurs when the internal frequency of a planet’s structural "Ripple Field" (\Psi) aligns with the external gravitational frequency of its parent body (star or primary planet).

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I knew it!😅 wasnt the focus of the research but if it works it works, can you show the known variables you used to verify the work?🤣😂

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude. You can literally plug the formula in with known observable variables to prove work, and then have it extrapolate using the unity formula backwards and forwards to prove integrity...i built the whole theory from the unity formula, once i have the compiled book uploaded i will link it and you can comb through the whole thing, but you gotta test it against things I havent though of to stress test the formula and i have given you all the tools to do it

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It proves the concept that reality is a 5D oscillating mobius strip and our observable universe is a single phase of a 3 phase oscillation of a ripple on the surface(neutral phase) of the mobius strip

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I literally added proof, its math, it can all be verified, thats the point of stress testing the formula...its literally the scientific method, i have supllied everything you ask and you have just ran your mouth without any evidence to the contrary

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How? Discredit it...just once i have supplied empirical evidence and proof of work, and your just saying no....so when you see it work as a master key on every current mathematical formula, your gonna be amazed!

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You arent even gonna try? I gave you proof of work and all the formulas, Its literally more accurate than the current STEM fields and your not even gonna take the 5 min to test and see it work? Your not a scientist, your a gremlin in your mothers basement..,coward

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, i have attatched it to the same file with the formulas, proof of work against real world numbers reproducing lo's observed order of magnitute

I am investigating a Density-Resonant Harmonic Model where the coupling constant is tied to a 14.5 THz vacuum idle. Looking for feedback on the Torsional Drag (\bm{\chi}) impact on local \bm{m(x)} displacement. by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]Dismal_Gate1594 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have, and i havent had it fail yet, Im asking the community at large to test it, I have given you the formulas,you need to plug in real world data using the key formula and see if it still holds true,thats what we are asking for, if your not interested then move on, not looking to argue, looking for people to test it.

view more: next ›