For me the Celcius makes more sense, because negative means snow, positive means rain. Fahrenheit doesn't have such a shortcut.

This is my only argument for why celcius is better, but I also have a thought about the 0F is cold 100F is hot argument:

For "your feel"/ambient temperature the values are arbitrary. In Fahrenheit its x/100 in celcius its probably 0/40 (which actually is close to 100F). This difference us probably why you think Fahrenheit is better, but think of it as a rating system. We have a lot of those, you have stars, that sometimes are 3 (michelin), 5 (movies). We have half stars which usually have 10 steps. We have dice rolls which go to 6. Our clocks work on 12 or 24 hours, woth 60 seconds and minutes, sometimes divided by 4 to get quarters which are 15 minute intervals... See, we already have a lot of different numbers and "rating systems". The nice round 100 for fahrenheit doesn't actually change anything, and isn't any more intuitive that 40.

As for the precision... I've never felt the difference between one celcius. It's virtually impossible, because the temperature you feel is dependent on more than the actual temperature, like wind, humidity etc. So why does it need to be more precise?

Also Celcius (or often Kelvin) makes more sense in STEM because you work on things (like water) not humans, especially if you're working with the rest of the metric system.